If geeks love it, we’re on it

AMD's Phenom X3 Processors

AMD's Phenom X3 Processors

Final Thoughts

There you have it. AMD’s Phenom X3 is certainly a very unique product. Priced at less than many of Intel’s dual-core offerings, the X3 lineup is sure to get the attention of the mainstream and budget conscious crowd. Starting at only $145 for the X3 8450, buyers can get quite a bit of processor for their money.

Intel’s Core2 processors are a very tough crowd to beat these days though, especially their latest 45nm models. Although the 45nm Core2 Duo often outperforms the Phenom X3 in older and single-threaded applications, the X3s posses a lot of untapped potential that will be useful in the future. As we’ve seen—the X3 scales very well in applications that can take advantage of multiple processing cores. Multi-threaded applications will become increasingly common moving forward, so the X3 is a good longer-term choice in that respect. Really, it comes down to fewer, faster cores, or more numerous, slower cores. When comparing the raw crunching power in some synthetic benchmarks, the X3 8750 and the E8400 are almost at par. The problem is finding real-world applications today that can take advantage of that extra horsepower.

I think the X3’s biggest adopters will be in the integrated graphics segment. AMD’s latest 780G chipset is the integrated platform to own today. The X3 complements it very nicely and the combination will definitely find its way into sub $500 PCs. It will be difficult to find an integrated platform from Intel that offers what the 780G and X3 do. I think that the X3 will be very popular among OEMs for this reason—the average consumer wants a capable system—not just a CPU.

We’d like to sincerely thank AMD for providing us with the X3 processor we used to make this review possible.

« Previous

Comments

  1. Leonardo
    Leonardo Thanks for the review, Mike.

    Very interesting.

    :cool:
  2. GHoosdum
    GHoosdum It was great that you went the extra mile and cleared the "bad" core issue up with AMD. Go Mike!
  3. Winfrey
    Winfrey These seem like a decent step up from the "X2" AMD processors. I'd personally like to see how they fold with an SMP client. Pretty encouraging for AMD, it's not beating intel soundly but the fab process definitely helps AMD to keep prices very competitive.

    Learned lots thanks Mike!
  4. primesuspect
  5. BuddyJ
  6. Straight_Man
    Straight_Man I'll have to wait and see-- can't afford such a machine in the next six months-- but will be interested to see how they spread and how popular they are. I am running a 2.66 GHz Intel processor now that was state of the art 4 years ago, due to the fact that I have no current applications that can use multiple cores in the versions I have.
  7. Leonardo
    Leonardo
    but the fab process definitely helps AMD to keep prices very competitive
    No, AMD prices are de facto set by Intel. AMD has no choice in the matter.
  8. Winfrey
    Winfrey
    Leonardo wrote:
    No, AMD prices are de facto set by Intel. AMD has no choice in the matter.

    Correct but the fab process helps take some pressure off of being forced to set that low price, as in it is more affordable for AMD than if they didn't have their fab process.
  9. Your-Amish-Daddy
    Your-Amish-Daddy Well. Three cores...I don't really know what to think of that... I remember when two cores meant two physical chips, back in the day of the Athlon MP's and dual P3 Slot rigs...MAN thsoe made powerful machines. But I wonder if XP will handle 3 cores...?
  10. Thrax
    Thrax XP can handle however many cores CPU manufacturers can fit into two physical sockets.
  11. BuddyJ

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!