If geeks love it, we’re on it

AMD's Phenom X3 Processors

AMD's Phenom X3 Processors

Specifications and Detail

AMD is launching three triple core processors today—the 8750, 8650 and the 8450. The only varying specification between any of these three models is the operating frequency.

  • AMD Phenom X3 8750: 2.4GHz
  • AMD Phenom X3 8650: 2.3GHz
  • AMD Phenom X3 8450: 2.1GHz

The pricing of the X3 lineup at launch is as follows (1KU):

  • AMD Phenom X3 8750: $195
  • AMD Phenom X3 8650: $165
  • AMD Phenom X3 8450: $145

All other aspects of the three processors are identical. The specifics from AMD are provided below for reference:

  • L1 Cache Sizes: 64K of L1 instruction and 64K of L1 data cache per core (384KB total L1 per X3 processor)
  • L2 Cache Sizes: 512KB of L2 data cache per core (1.5MB total L2 per X3 processor)
  • L3 Cache Size: 2MB (shared)
  • Memory Controller Type: Integrated 128-bit wide memory controller
  • Memory Controller Speed: Up to 1.8GHz with Dual Dynamic Power Management
  • Types of Memory Supported: Support for unregistered DIMMs up to PC2 8500 (DDR2-1066MHz)
  • HyperTransport 3.0: One 16-bit/16-bit link @ up to 3.6GHz full duplex (2.0GHz x2)
  • Total Processor Bandwidth: Up to 31.5 GB/s bandwidth
  • Packaging: Socket AM2+ 940-pin organic micro pin grid array (micro-PGA)
  • Fab location: AMD’s Fab 36 wafer fabrication facilities in Dresden, Germany
  • Process Technology: 65-nanometer DSL SOI (silicon-on-insulator) technology
  • Approximate Transistor count: ~ 450 million (65nm)
  • Approximate Die Size: 285 mm2 (65nm)
  • Max Ambient Case Temp: 70° Celsius
  • Nominal Voltage: 1.05-1.25 Volts
  • Max TDP: 95 Watts

So there you have it—literally B3 Phenom quads with one core disabled. All of the other specifications are the same. I found it interesting that AMD decided to launch a 2.1GHz ‘8450’ part, as opposed to a 2.2GHz ‘8550’. There are no Phenom X4 processors running as low as 2.1GHz today—I suspect that the 8450 is AMD’s attempt to squeeze a very inexpensive model into the lineup.

You’ll also notice that the full 2MB of L3 cache is still available to the three cores. In effect, there is more L3 cache per core available than with an X4 Phenom. This may actually improve core efficiency slightly in some heavy multi-threaded situations. Since the L1 and L2 cache is dedicated per core, whatever was available to the disabled core is also cut off from the rest of the processor.

You’ll also notice that all of the X3 processors are rated for a maximum thermal design power of 95 watts. This means that the Phenom X3 should work well in just about any “lower budget” motherboard. After hearing many stories of failing VRM components on cheaper boards running 125W CPUs like the Phenom X4 9850 and Athlon 64 X2 6400+, I was pleased to see this. Keeping the TDP down is especially important with chips targeting the value and mainstream segments of the market—buyers won’t be throwing these in $300 motherboards.

The Phenom X3 operates at 1.25V unless Cool’n’Quiet is activated, at which point it can drop down to about 1.05V.

« Previous Next page »

Comments

  1. Leonardo
    Leonardo Thanks for the review, Mike.

    Very interesting.

    :cool:
  2. GHoosdum
    GHoosdum It was great that you went the extra mile and cleared the "bad" core issue up with AMD. Go Mike!
  3. Winfrey
    Winfrey These seem like a decent step up from the "X2" AMD processors. I'd personally like to see how they fold with an SMP client. Pretty encouraging for AMD, it's not beating intel soundly but the fab process definitely helps AMD to keep prices very competitive.

    Learned lots thanks Mike!
  4. primesuspect
  5. BuddyJ
  6. Straight_Man
    Straight_Man I'll have to wait and see-- can't afford such a machine in the next six months-- but will be interested to see how they spread and how popular they are. I am running a 2.66 GHz Intel processor now that was state of the art 4 years ago, due to the fact that I have no current applications that can use multiple cores in the versions I have.
  7. Leonardo
    Leonardo
    but the fab process definitely helps AMD to keep prices very competitive
    No, AMD prices are de facto set by Intel. AMD has no choice in the matter.
  8. Winfrey
    Winfrey
    Leonardo wrote:
    No, AMD prices are de facto set by Intel. AMD has no choice in the matter.

    Correct but the fab process helps take some pressure off of being forced to set that low price, as in it is more affordable for AMD than if they didn't have their fab process.
  9. Your-Amish-Daddy
    Your-Amish-Daddy Well. Three cores...I don't really know what to think of that... I remember when two cores meant two physical chips, back in the day of the Athlon MP's and dual P3 Slot rigs...MAN thsoe made powerful machines. But I wonder if XP will handle 3 cores...?
  10. Thrax
    Thrax XP can handle however many cores CPU manufacturers can fit into two physical sockets.
  11. BuddyJ

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!