Howdy, stranger! Ready to join the community? [log in]

Phenom II X2 550BE and Athlon II X2 250

Test Results

Sisoft Sandra 2009 SP2

Sisoft Sandra is a great synthetic benchmark suite that can evaluate numerous aspects of a system; we used the CPU Arithmetic, Cryptography, Memory Bandwidth and Memory Latency tests for ours.

We’re using version 15.72, which is friendly to processors containing two, three or four cores.

arithmetic

The AMD dual cores aren’t going to tackle the big multi-core chips in this benchmark but they stack up nicely against the Core 2 Duo E8400. While it’s easy to snub these results, keep in mind that the E8400 is more expensive and positioned in a higher market space. With that perspective, we see that AMD’s new dual cores compete well outside of their price bracket and should give Big Blue’s E6000 and E7000-series CPUs a run for their money.

cryptography

Sandra's crypto test paints a similar picture.

memory-bandwidth

AMD’s dualies turn pretty impressive scores for such inexpensive chips, and they easily surpass both older Phenom IIs and Intel’s Core 2 series. With a bump in clock speed, the Phenom II X2 550 and Athlon II X2 250 would join the ranks of the fastest Phenom IIs in this test.

memory-latency

AMD's new chips offer predictable latency.

« PreviousNext page »

Share |

4 Comments:

  1. Zuntar
    Modder extraordinaire

    On the Crysis High settings graph, the two processors reviewed are not on this graph. What am i missing?

    I am curious how these stand against the 7850 Kuma as well, but i know that can be inferred by other reviews. Any thoughts?

  2. Peter G.
    Dept. of Propaganda

    Fixed the graph. For some reason the graph didn't update when I put in the new processor data. The 7850 Kuma is clocked slower and runs hotter. Subtract a third of the X3 8750's performance and you'll get a good idea.

    I'd take these 45nm chips over the Kuma any day of the week.

  3. Gargoyle
    We can't stop here...

    Nice review, Peter!

  4. Cliff_Forster
    Keepin it real

    I recently purchased a Kuma 7750 for a budget build I was doing. For $59 and a free copy of "Call of Juarez" from newegg, you can't argue with it, but I will echo what Peter is saying, AMD's 45nm runs cooler, and offers a much easier overclock than the 65nm Kuma.

Hey, be nice. Icrontic is full of good people, we promise.

New Features on Icrontic: