Howdy, stranger! Ready to join the community? [log in]

Phenom II X2 550BE and Athlon II X2 250

Cinebench R10 64-bit

Maxon produces Cinebench R10. It is based on their Cinema 4D animation application and is very CPU intensive. It allows benchmarks to be conducted using one, or all available CPU cores. Additional cores can provide very large improvements in Cinebench scores.

phenom2_cbbench1

Three tests are conducted using Cinebench; the first is the rendering test utilizing only a single core; the second uses all available cores. Once both tests are conducted, Cinebench reports how much faster the multi-threaded test was. This scaling information is useful to determine how well multiple cores scale during rendering workloads.

The third test is the Cinebench OpenGL 3D rendering benchmark and we’ve thrown that in for good measure as well.

cinebench

Cinebench favors cores and clock speed, putting both chips at a disadvantage from the get-go. Despite this, the Phenom II X2 550 does a surprisingly solid job competing with the other processors. The extra cache and clock speed allow it to creep ahead of the Athlon II X2 250 in single-threaded testing. If we wrote a children’s story, the Phenom II X2 550 would be named The Little Dual Core That Could.

cinebenchrender

Two cores and HyperTransport make for extremely efficient scaling.

cinebenchopengl

We were really surprised then to see the Phenom II X2 550 pull into third place on our benchmark here. Gamers take note! The Phenom II X3 720 has made a name for itself as a good gamer processor, but the Phenom II X2 550 may be out to take its throne.

« PreviousNext page »

Share |

4 Comments:

  1. Zuntar
    Modder extraordinaire

    On the Crysis High settings graph, the two processors reviewed are not on this graph. What am i missing?

    I am curious how these stand against the 7850 Kuma as well, but i know that can be inferred by other reviews. Any thoughts?

  2. Peter G.
    Dept. of Propaganda

    Fixed the graph. For some reason the graph didn't update when I put in the new processor data. The 7850 Kuma is clocked slower and runs hotter. Subtract a third of the X3 8750's performance and you'll get a good idea.

    I'd take these 45nm chips over the Kuma any day of the week.

  3. Gargoyle
    We can't stop here...

    Nice review, Peter!

  4. Cliff_Forster
    Keepin it real

    I recently purchased a Kuma 7750 for a budget build I was doing. For $59 and a free copy of "Call of Juarez" from newegg, you can't argue with it, but I will echo what Peter is saying, AMD's 45nm runs cooler, and offers a much easier overclock than the 65nm Kuma.

Hey, be nice. Icrontic is full of good people, we promise.

New Features on Icrontic: