Howdy, stranger! Ready to join the community? [log in]

Phenom II X2 550BE and Athlon II X2 250

Crysis

Crysis is still one of the most GPU-centric games on the market and is considered by many to be the standard that new hardware is measured against. Crysis features both DX9 and DX10 support for Windows Vista, and we’ll be running it in both configurations for testing.

phenom2_crybench1

We used the “Crysis Benchmark Tool” to benchmark Crysis. The “benchmark_cpu” timedemo was used. There is quite a bit of building destruction and other heavy physics going on in this particular timedemo, and it is a good choice for CPU benchmarking. We used two different configurations for testing: The first uses a 1024×768 resolution and the Medium IQ settings to simulate a substantial CPU bottleneck and the second configuration is set for DX10 rendering and a higher 1680×1050 resolution with “High” IQ settings.

crysismedium

Both dual core chips give playable average frame rates in Crysis as the X2 550 ties the aged Core 2 Quad Q6600. Crysis likes memory bandwidth as much as cores so the Phenom II X2 has a good chance to equal things out with the Intel quad.

crysishigh

With Crysis cranked up to the high setting, we still maintain 30 fps average. Neither processor stands out, but neither falls flat on its face either.

« PreviousNext page »

Share |

4 Comments:

  1. Zuntar
    Modder extraordinaire

    On the Crysis High settings graph, the two processors reviewed are not on this graph. What am i missing?

    I am curious how these stand against the 7850 Kuma as well, but i know that can be inferred by other reviews. Any thoughts?

  2. Peter G.
    Dept. of Propaganda

    Fixed the graph. For some reason the graph didn't update when I put in the new processor data. The 7850 Kuma is clocked slower and runs hotter. Subtract a third of the X3 8750's performance and you'll get a good idea.

    I'd take these 45nm chips over the Kuma any day of the week.

  3. Gargoyle
    We can't stop here...

    Nice review, Peter!

  4. Cliff_Forster
    Keepin it real

    I recently purchased a Kuma 7750 for a budget build I was doing. For $59 and a free copy of "Call of Juarez" from newegg, you can't argue with it, but I will echo what Peter is saying, AMD's 45nm runs cooler, and offers a much easier overclock than the 65nm Kuma.

Hey, be nice. Icrontic is full of good people, we promise.

New Features on Icrontic: