Too much time on my hands?

DogSoldierDogSoldier The heart of radical Amish country..
edited February 2004 in Folding@Home
For the last 2 weeks I've been calculating the folding rates for the 3 machines working for me and saving the results (Ode to Keto) in a Word document. I converted the Word document into an HTML table and you can look at the results Here.

This is how I calculated these numbers. Using the timestamps on the logs I used the duration calculator here, http://www.timeanddate.com/date/duration.html to track how long it took to Fold a WU. Using a simple calculation, Hours x 60 + minutes/ by 100 = Minutes per Frame.

In order to be consistent, I divided all durations by 100 frames, even the 400s. Points per WU can be found here: http://folding.stanford.edu/psummary.html I wish I had more results but F@H has this irritating habit of overwriting it's own logs.

Comments

  • edcentricedcentric near Milwaukee, Wisconsin Icrontian
    edited February 2004
    So your table is 'time per 1percent completion'
    Now just factor in the points values and you can generate 'points per hour' for each machine and wu.
    It just sounded like you wanted to expand the project........
  • DogSoldierDogSoldier The heart of radical Amish country..
    edited February 2004
    Actually, I was curious as to why my home and office computer differed very little in the amount of WUs they'd completed. So it was an excercise to find out how fast each machine Folded. But I'm certain others will want to compare their machines' speeds to mine. It's the only benchmark that I'm aware of.
  • edited February 2004
    don't know how good it is but EMIII has "points per hour" on the html generating page of it's options window.
Sign In or Register to comment.