Project 2604 - really weird PPD

EyesOnlyEyesOnly Sweden New
edited April 2007 in Folding@Home
Have a look at the image. :eek: What the heck is going on. All previous wus has had proper PPD but this one. And it folding just well according to the log. About 25 mins a frame which sound ok.

BTW the time in my fahlog is off by about 2 hours. How come? My computer has the correct time. :confused: It's really confusing when i try to see what the client has done when the time is all wrong. As an example it completed the 17 frame while i was typing this at 10.40 am yet the log says it happened at 8.40. :eek: Have i missed some setting?

Comments

  • EyesOnlyEyesOnly Sweden New
    edited April 2007
    BTW here's the log from today. Note that i launched the client 2 hours later than the log says after a reboot.

    Launch directory: /home/eyesonly/folding/FAH
    Executable: ./fah5


    [06:35:33] - Ask before connecting: No
    [06:35:33] - User name: EyesOnly (Team 93)
    [06:35:33] - User ID: 52AA22C6393F7FF5
    [06:35:33] - Machine ID: 1
    [06:35:33]
    [06:35:33] Loaded queue successfully.
    [06:35:33]
    [06:35:33] + Processing work unit
    [06:35:33] Core required: FahCore_a1.exe
    [06:35:33] Core found.
    [06:35:33] Working on Unit 02 [April 11 06:35:33]
    [06:35:33] + Working ...
    [06:35:33]
    [06:35:33] *
    *
    [06:35:33] Folding@Home Gromacs SMP Core
    [06:35:33] Version 1.73 (November 27, 2006)
    [06:35:33]
    [06:35:33] Preparing to commence simulation
    [06:35:33] - Ensuring status. Please wait.
    [06:35:50] - Looking at optimizations...
    [06:35:50] - Working with standard loops on this execution.
    [06:35:50] - Previous termination of core was improper.
    [06:35:50] - Going to use standard loops.
    [06:35:50] - Files status OK
    [06:35:51] - Expanded 2949193 -> 15158509 (decompressed 513.9 percent)
    [06:35:52]
    [06:35:52] Project: 2604 (Run 0, Clone 83, Gen 25)
    [06:35:52]
    [06:35:52] Entering M.D.
    [06:35:58] Calling FAH init
    [06:35:59] in POPC
    [06:35:59] Writing local files
    [06:35:59] Completed 65000 out of 500000 steps (13 percent)
    [06:35:59] OPC
    [06:35:59] Writing local files
    [06:35:59] Completed 65000 out of 500000 steps (13 percent)
    [06:36:00] Extra SSE boost OK.
    [07:05:21] Writing local files
    [07:05:21] Completed 70000 out of 500000 steps (14 percent)
    [07:34:50] Writing local files
    [07:34:50] Completed 75000 out of 500000 steps (15 percent)
    [08:03:16] Writing local files
    [08:03:16] Completed 80000 out of 500000 steps (16 percent)
    [08:32:17] Writing local files
    [08:32:17] Completed 85000 out of 500000 steps (17 percent)
  • SPIKE09SPIKE09 Scatland
    edited April 2007
    FAH is always GMT that would explain the time difference.
  • EyesOnlyEyesOnly Sweden New
    edited April 2007
    You're right that makes sense. So what about the PPD? Has anyone else seen this with this project?
  • LeonardoLeonardo Wake up and smell the glaciers Eagle River, Alaska Icrontian
    edited April 2007
    I haven't processed a 2604 yet. I'll try to remember to post when I do get one.
  • EyesOnlyEyesOnly Sweden New
    edited April 2007
    It's away so now i'm folding a 2605 with the same amount of points but it says it'll be done in 2 days which sounds ok. Has anyone else seen the strange PPD in 2604. I can't be the only one who's folded one.
  • LeonardoLeonardo Wake up and smell the glaciers Eagle River, Alaska Icrontian
    edited April 2007
    strange PPD in 2604. I can't be the only one who's folded one
    I can picture Vijay Pande briefing his scientists and software engineers around a wall-mounted chart:

    "Now see here, we've got this strange Swedish fella over their in Scandanavia. I think we should develop a very strange, inscrutable work unit just for him!" And so, it came to pass!

    No, I have not yet seen a 2604 or 2605 yet, and I've got five dual core machines Folding SMP Windows. You now, I didn't ask - is 2604 and 2605 Windows SMP or Linux SMP?
  • EyesOnlyEyesOnly Sweden New
    edited April 2007
    Linux i think. Is the projects different between os's. Seems weird to have different wus for each os. Different cores perhaps but not wus. :confused:

    So is pande singling me out? :eek: :bigggrin:
  • Ultra-NexusUltra-Nexus Buenos Aires, ARG
    edited April 2007
    Those are Linux WUs only... probably a problem with Fahmon calculation of PPDs.
  • EyesOnlyEyesOnly Sweden New
    edited April 2007
    I got anotherone and the same problem again. I've set the program to download new projects on it's own and have also downloaded new ones one. Will see later if there's a change. Strange that it only affects one project.
Sign In or Register to comment.