PDA

View Full Version : Encrypted File Sharing: P2P Fights Back


Spinner
27 May 2004, 11:30pm
Masking the user's IP address is the Holy Grail of file-sharing networks. An innovative software product recently released by Syncodea could eliminate concerns about getting caught and sued for sharing music and data files. Syncodea said that their product does not hide the IP address. Rather, it allows users of peer-to-peer shareware networks, such as Kazaa, to share files and data in encrypted transmissions on the open-swapping networks.

"Everybody now knows you can't download stuff for free," said Mark Ishikawa, CEO and founder of BayTSP, a leading security firm for the record industry. People who participate in file sharing through networks, he said, sooner or later will get caught. "It's like playing Russian Roulette."
Source: TechNewsWorld (http://www.technewsworld.com/story/34052.html)

entropy
28 May 2004, 1:03am
so...if you can share encrypted files ... big deal ... all they have to do is decrypt it, and if it's a government agency, they WILL do it rather quickly. seems worthless to me

Spinner
28 May 2004, 1:24am
so...if you can share encrypted files ... big deal ... all they have to do is decrypt it, and if it's a government agency, they WILL do it rather quickly. seems worthless to me
Not when it's the BUSH administration pulling the ropes.

That was just a little joke. It was in no means intended to insight a political debate. So no-one start one please. ;)

Camman
28 May 2004, 5:46am
so...if you can share encrypted files ... big deal ... all they have to do is decrypt it, and if it's a government agency, they WILL do it rather quickly. seems worthless to me

Even the simplest computer encryption technology can take days to crack on supercomputer systems, I doubt government resources would be wasted on such a thing for peer to peer filesharing..

EMT
28 May 2004, 12:47pm
Yes, it should be very difficult for them to decrypt the data. So what? It mentions hiding the IP address as the holy grail... does this achieve it? I don't think so. That means that someone in government (edit: or RIAA or MPAA etc.) can hop on and pretend to download something himself, and then he's got plenty of guilty IPs to choose from and the encryption hasn't helped anyone.