Post your 3DMark06 Benchmarks Here

[Sledgehammer70]

Well the new FutureMark 3DMark06 is out so lets see those scores!

Download: 3DMark®06 Basic Edition (Build 1.0.2) (http://www.futuremark.com/download/?3dmark06.shtml) (580MB)

[csimon]

Hey I'm first! And a terrible score I'm sure :p

http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/2951/untitled9wi.th.jpg (http://img7.imageshack.us/my.php?image=untitled9wi.jpg)
Actually I've seen quite a number today under 1k pts. I also saw a dual gtx sli with less that 8k.

[TheSmJ]

2497 Marks (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=13687) on the system in my sig.

Can't wait to compare it with my 64-bit system coming on Friday!

[sfleuriet]

Hey I'm first! And a terrible score I'm sure :p

http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/2951/untitled9wi.th.jpg (http://img7.imageshack.us/my.php?image=untitled9wi.jpg)

[Sledgehammer70]

I have a few scores! I'll tell you my prelims as I am starting to OC a few things now!

Stock - FX57 with Dual 7800GTX 512's = 7,546
Stock - 4800 X2 7800GTX 256 = 6,480
Stock - 4400 X2 7800GT 256 = 4,787
Stock - FX55 7800GT's 256's = 5,385
Stock - A64 3700+ 7800GT = 3,145
Stock - A64 4000+ 6800GT = 2,810
Stock - A64 3000+ 6800Ultra = 2,720

[paroxym]

Here's my hat into the ring:

3DMARK Score: 4645
SM2.0: 1933
HDR/SM3.0: 1890
CPU: 1603

4400X2 @ 2.4Ghz
7800GTX 256 @ 485/1340
1GB OCZ EB

Rest in sig...

[madmat]

Here's my less than steller results... http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=15387

A whopping 1902 but on the upside, i'm in the top 16 for 6800nu's with a P4...w00t

[RWB]

Mine was 1548, I just ran the test though without changing anything so I didn't change my driver settings or anything which may have AA and AF set to a high number becuase that's how I like to run my games.

X2 3800+ @ 2.4GHz with a stock 6600GT 128MB

[sfleuriet]

why in the world is mine such a bad score?? :scratch:

[Sledgehammer70]

you know my furst score my 7800GTX 256 system post was like a 1300... I was like what the hell! But I realized it only calc'ed 1 test in the final score. I ran it again and I got the score above :)

[RWB]

Got 1817 just now with new drivers and OC'd my card with Coolbits autodetect for OC.

It's funny that others with similar systems and drivers are getting such strange scores, some people with faster processors and GFX cards in both slow and faster speed are above and below me in ways that just don't make much sence.

[Leonardo]

Let's see, should I try it first with an ATI 9700 or my PCI 8MB wonder? Hmm? :scratch:


;D

[Omega65]

3DMark06 1974 :wtf:

Opty165@2.5ghz
2GB@227mhz
X850XTPE@540mhz
http://www.short-media.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=18874&d=1137710165

[sfleuriet]

Yeah.. I'm not liking these scores. ESPECIALLY mine :p

[hypermood]

2556 - A64@2500MHz + 6800GT AGP
Could be worse, I suppose.

[Kwitko]

3427:
eVGA 7800GT stock
A64 3000+ stock (1.8GHz)

[lemonlime]

3DMark06 is the Chuck Norris of benchmarks..

Opteron 148 @ 3.3GHz
BH-5 @ 238MHz 2-2-2-5 (couldn't really find a sweet spot with this stuff)
X850XT @ 575/600

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=28357

7th best X850XT on the orb, not too shabby, but only 2438 points.. I especially loved the 0FPS CPU test :D

[sfleuriet]

3427:
eVGA 7800GT stock
A64 3000+ stock (1.8GHz)
These scores are really baffling me. There seems to be no rhyme or reason to why some are higher than others.

EDIT: Well I just looked on the project scores, and I have the 3rd highest score for people with an AMD 64bit 2000-2100mhz processor and an x800pro video card. I guess my video card is just not that good?

[SpywareShooter]

haha. This pwns all of yours. I couldn't even run 3dMark06.

[Kwitko]

These scores are really baffling me. There seems to be no rhyme or reason to why some are higher than others.

EDIT: Well I just looked on the project scores, and I have the 3rd highest score for people with an AMD 64bit 2000-2100mhz processor and an x800pro video card. I guess my video card is just not that good?

16 pipelines versus 20? Yeah, you're gonna come up short.

[sfleuriet]

16 pipelines versus 20? Yeah, you're gonna come up short.
I knew you would take it personally and try to defend your video card.

[lemonlime]

These scores are really baffling me. There seems to be no rhyme or reason to why some are higher than others.

EDIT: Well I just looked on the project scores, and I have the 3rd highest score for people with an AMD 64bit 2000-2100mhz processor and an x800pro video card. I guess my video card is just not that good?

The ATI cards seem to be doing rather poorly in 06' compared to nvidia cards.. hypermood smoked my score, even though my CPU is 800MHz higher clocked. I'm not sure if it is just a driver thing, or what, because it's pretty much across the board with all ATI cards, including the x1800s.

[Kwitko]

I knew you would take it personally and try to defend your video card.

Uh, no. All else being equal, a slower card with fewer pipelines is going to score lower. Facts. Go figure.

[Thrax]

I knew you would take it personally and try to defend your video card.


What the hell does it have to do with defence? Your video card suffers from two things:
1) It was the loser of its generation
2) It's a generation older than Kwitko's.

How does simple mathematics mean he's "[Defending] [his] video card?" Really.

[RWB]

It sounded like a joke to me guys ;)

[Thrax]

Text. Sarcasm.. Does not compute. Try one of these: ;D

[roland_dmp]

1962 3dmarks here.

AXP 2600+@2.31GHz
512MB@209MHz
128MB 6800@407/860MHz

[Omega65]

It's not about pipelines.....When 3DMark06 was being formulated, ATI didn't have it's nexgen hardware available. You need SM3.0 and HDR (High Dynamic Range lighting) hardware to excel in 3dMark06.

Some info from TechReport (http://techreport.com/onearticle.x/9293)
he day before 3DMark06's release proved to be an interesting one in Damage Labs. As I huddled here in seclusion testing all of the latest graphics cards on this new benchmark, a little green bird fluttered in and landed on my shoulder. It sang the praises of 3DMark06, saying that this new version should do a better job of tracking with real-world game performance than past editions, noting that 3DMark05 wasn't horrible, but was simply too vertex bound, as the example of the Radeon X1600 demonstrated. (The X1600 overachieved in 3DMark05, running relatively faster than in nearly any game.) 3DMark06, it cooed, should right that wrong and better achieve its stated goals.

....than a redbird perched on the top of my monitor, singing a very different song. This creature, too, noted that 3DMark05 was excessively vertex-bound, but its take on the future was considerably grimmer.

The Redbird then sang several verses of lament over specific issues with 3DMark06. The depth stencil format, explained the first sad stanza, requires a painful pixel-shader-based workaround on some hardware but not on others.

The third stanza told the tragic tale of Shader Model 3.0 flow control, an incredibly important feature used only sparingly in 3DMark06, by the sound of it. Alas. Stanza four turned back to Shader Model 2.0, mournfully noting that the additional pixel shader load in these tests had a curiously green tint about it

The fifth verse was most melancholy of them all, acknowledging that things might have been different had the R520 not been late to market and unavailable during 3DMark06's incubation.

Pics from PCper Article
Note how well the X1600XT & 6800GS score in the test (compared to the X850 XT)
FX-55 CPU (2.4ghz 1MB)
http://www.short-media.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=18885&d=1137766701http://www.short-media.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=18886&d=1137766701

[lemonlime]

It's not about pipelines.....When 3DMark06 was being formulated, ATI didn't have it's nexgen hardware available. You need SM3.0 and HDR (High Dynamic Range lighting) hardware to excel in 3dMark06.

Some info from TechReport (http://techreport.com/onearticle.x/9293)


Pics from PCper Article
Note how well the X1600XT & 6800GS score in the test (compared to the X850 XT)
FX-55 CPU (2.4ghz 1MB)

Interesting info Omega65.. Looks like ATI is paying for it's tardiness now. Many people seem to base their buying decisions on futuremark benchmarks, so they may feel the pain for quite some time..

My X850 does terribly compared to 6800 series cards. Near stock 6800GS models with stock a64s are scoring several hundred points higher, even when my x850 is clocked to it's max and a CPU clock of 3.3GHz.

[scott]

4303 3DMarks

This is from my htpc
3500+ Clawhammer @ 2600mhz DFI NF4 Ultra D ( modded for SLI ) ( I need another 7800 )
1gig OCZ platinum EL
BFG 7800GTX OC @ 490 1350

Scott

[GrayFox]

Pilot you need Sm 3 to get a decent score in this (Doesn't make any noticeable diffrence in the real world yet... but it will in about another year or two).

[sfleuriet]

Pilot you need Sm 3 to get a decent score in this (Doesn't make any noticeable diffrence in the real world yet... but it will in about another year or two).
Okay - that answer makes more sense to me. Thanks

[V|P]

hey guys my 64 is coming in one either monday or tuesday wat u guys think????? if anyone here is nice enough to explain to me wat exactly benchmarking is and wat i need to do, etc. anyway guys check out this sys and let me know if the DVD drive is bootable? thnx guys

[csimon]

4427

eVga 7800GT @ 488/1300 stock cooling

[sfleuriet]

Nice :cool:

[Leonardo]

(Doesn't make any noticeable diffrence in the real world yet... but it will in about another year or two)....in another year or two, when 3DMark07 or 08 is out, with tricks and software torture two years ahead of the games available in 07 or 08, and then...

Don't get me wrong, I enjoy benchmarking as much as the next guy. I just hope members here don't feel they need new $$$ video cards because of a less than stellar showing in 3DMark.


Just wait till I unleash my 3D Rage!

[madmat]

4427

eVga 7800GT @ 488/1300 stock cooling

/me hits csimon over the head and sneaks of with his PC...:nudge:

[madmat]

I got to 2092 last night!! Wheee

Got this just a bit ago...

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v474/madmat_2001/3DMark06.jpg

[sgtwilliams]

Well my ATI card took a beating, nothing like running a BM and watching consistent 6FPS

AMD 64 3200 stock speeds
ATI X850 256 AGP
Smoking 1652score

AMD 64 3800X2
Nvidia 7800 GT OC (BFG)
bit more smoking 3679score.

The difference between the 2 systems in Aquamark is like 14,000

Interesting.

[csimon]

I got 4530 and saved it to a 3dr file ...any idea how to view that format?

[sfleuriet]

I got 4530 and saved it to a 3dr file ...any idea how to view that format?
I found that posted online and this is all I could find:
right click anywhere in the 3D Mark 2003 window and select "open saved result in excel". That way you can see and (if you want) edit them or add notes or stuff like that. U just need excel in order to open them...
I opened up my 2006 and found that option, but it was grayed out - I guess it's only for the Pro edition?

[csimon]

I found that posted online and this is all I could find:

I opened up my 2006 and found that option, but it was grayed out - I guess it's only for the Pro edition?
I think it works after you bench and get sesults to save ...not sure just a guess.
I'm not too worried about it though I was getting slight artifacts anyway.
I clocked down the card to 488/1300 and ended up with 4501 and I'm happy with that. Next I'll be working oc'ing the processor with the x10 multi.

[madmat]

The to Excel option is available for pro version only. The only way to veiw saved results is to submit them if you don't have the pro version. I know it's available in my screenshots but that's because I do have the pro version.

[NeoFX]

Just ran the test w/ default/factory settings. No overclock.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=120363

Just over 3600.

[deicist]

5638

Opty 170 @ 2.5GHz
X1900XT @ stock

[primesuspect]

2160

Opteron 170 @ stock
X850 Crossfire Edition @ stock

[reelbigfish]

I got 4005 on my system.

Pentium D 930
Evga 7800GT
2GB G.Skill DDR2 667
Gigabyte GA-8N-SLI

all at stock.

[csimon]

2160

Opteron 170 @ stock
X850 Crossfire Edition @ stock

Brian did you save the sceeny so we could see the cpu score? I'd like to check that out. The ati video cards always score low on this bench for some odd reason ...

[deicist]

Brian did you save the sceeny so we could see the cpu score? I'd like to check that out. The ati video cards always score low on this bench for some odd reason ...

Does the x850 have SM3.0? If not that could be why it's scoring low.

[lemonlime]

Does the x850 have SM3.0? If not that could be why it's scoring low.

'fraid not :(

That was one of the big issues between the 6800 and x8xx series cards last year. I don't think ATI thought SM3 would take off like it did..

[csimon]

the x1900's are dooing really well.

[ronbo]

2141 no o/c

MSI K8N Neo2
AMD 3200 Winny
Leadtech 6800GT

[Nightwolf]

Downloading now..Should have it by midnite lol. I didn't want to run it until i got my new memory but i want something to compare it with.

[pseudonym]

Card is really a vanilla 6800 with the pipelines open and tricked to think its an Ultra, still runs at 6800 speeds though.

First one is with my card at stock, 2nd one is OC'ed to 350/800.

CPU was, uhhh, interesting to say the least. Nothing like averaging around .25 fps!!

[Nightwolf]

W00T....1191, amazing huh?

[fudgam]

A bit low...

And why does it say my GPU core is at 10.5 mhz? My 6800 is clocked at 407/864.

[TheSmJ]

It gives funny readings sometimes.

[Rockrz]

I'm new to benchmarking, so you guys let me know if this is respectable for the system I have:
.
.
http://www.professionalmediaservices.com/offsite_pics/benchmark.jpg

[csimon]

I'm new to benchmarking, so you guys let me know if this is respectable for the system I have:
.
.
http://www.professionalmediaservices.com/offsite_pics/benchmark.jpg:woowoo: anybody wanna buy a used 7800gt? ;D :respect:

[tmh88]

:woowoo: anybody wanna buy a used 7800gt? ;D :respect:


yea, but first can i borrow like $350? :bigggrin:

[MrBill]

I think I set the record. :D

[Rockrz]

:woowoo: anybody wanna buy a used 7800gt? ;D :respect:So is my score good for the computer I have?

I'm just trying to figure out if I'm getting the kind of performance from my equipment that I should be.

For the amount of money I spent on this system, I really need for it to perform according to the level of performance it should be performing at.

In other words, I want to make sure I got my moneys worth!
The only way I know of to find out is to ask all you gamer guys......:bigggrin:

[csimon]

So is my score good for the computer I have?

I'm just trying to figure out if I'm getting the kind of performance from my equipment that I should be.

For the amount of money I spent on this system, I really need for it to perform according to the level of performance it should be performing at.

In other words, I want to make sure I got my moneys worth!
The only way I know of to find out is to ask all you gamer guys......:bigggrin:

Definitely is performing right on par with your equip ...it's what we strive for with cheaper equipment by overclocking. You would bring in one hellacious score if you were overclocking that's for sure. But for stock you are right on par for what you've got.:aol: ;D

[Rockrz]

Great, thanks.

I didn't want to have to get into over clocking...but you never know what the future holds!
:hiding:

[csimon]

The beta 84.12 drivers are definitely doing it for me ...at least a 70 point overall increase.

video: 488/1300

[Rockrz]

The beta 84.12 drivers are definitely doing it for me...OK...what's 84.12 drivers?

[TheSmJ]

The beta 84.12 drivers are definitely doing it for me ...at least a 70 point overall increase.

video: 488/1300


Keep in mind a 70 point increase in 3DMark is negligible. Chances are your score would very by at least 50-70 points every time you rebooted/tested your system.

[csimon]

Keep in mind a 70 point increase in 3DMark is negligible. Chances are your score would very by at least 50-70 points every time you rebooted/tested your system.
No way ...the score variation is no where near that many points ...not but maybe 5-7 for me anyway.:rockon:

Just to prove to myself I ran it again just now w/ same video OC and I even lowered the htt 1 mhz to 241x11@1:1 ...here's what I got.:hair:

What I'll do next is boot down and let the machine sit for about 10 minutes to cool down. Then I'll run it once more from a cold boot ...it's the only thing I can think to do different other than physically shake the box!;D I'll just add the results to this same post.

edit:\ Sorry I didn't get to post back last night I got sleepy waiting on ambient temps to settle down.

I ran a few and this is what I got ...

220@1.30v: total=4511 sm2=1797 sm3=1804 cpu=1827
230@1.35v: total=4546 sm2=1799 sm3=1808 cpu=1907
240@1.40v: total=4587 sm2=1801 sm3=1812 cpu=2013

[Trash80]

It has been like a million years since I posted here (the site loads really slow for me for some reason) but here is my latest.

8120
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=166789

[Rockrz]

the site loads really slow for me for some reasonIt's not just you, bro...
The guys need to change hosting companies and go with someone who is running decent equipment.

I heard they were hosted on a server running Windows 98...first edition!:sad2:

[TheSmJ]

No way ...the score variation is no where near that many points ...not but maybe 5-7 for me anyway.:rockon:

Just to prove to myself I ran it again just now w/ same video OC and I even lowered the htt 1 mhz to 241x11@1:1 ...here's what I got.:hair:

What I'll do next is boot down and let the machine sit for about 10 minutes to cool down. Then I'll run it once more from a cold boot ...it's the only thing I can think to do different other than physically shake the box!;D I'll just add the results to this same post.

edit:\ Sorry I didn't get to post back last night I got sleepy waiting on ambient temps to settle down.

I ran a few and this is what I got ...

220@1.30v: total=4511 sm2=1797 sm3=1804 cpu=1827
230@1.35v: total=4546 sm2=1799 sm3=1808 cpu=1907
240@1.40v: total=4587 sm2=1801 sm3=1812 cpu=2013



Sorry csimon, but what point are you trying to make here? :confused2

[Jimborae]

:ukflag:

[csimon]

Sorry csimon, but what point are you trying to make here? :confused2
I'm too old to remember! :bawling:
So SmJ ...how do you like the pa160?

[TheSmJ]

Just baaaaaaaarley fit into my case, and I had to remove the first three 3.5" bays to do it. You can slide a sheet of paper around it's edges, but anything thicker couldn't squeeze around it.

[Jimborae]

Ok a bit of an upgrade, X2 3800@2.5ghz & twin 79oogt's@ 570x1770

[Winga]

3624

64 3500+
7800gt

[TheSmJ]

3044 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=287678)
Pretty good for a 6800GT I'd say. That WC system gives the GPU core a lot of OCing headroom.

[Winga]

:celebrate I just received my 7900GT's and have run a benchmark on a single card stock and OC'd with coolbits using the "Detect Optimal Frequencies" option.

Got 4150 on stock and 4470 on frequencies of 552/859

I am going to fiddle around with two of these babies in SLI over the next few days. Will post some scores then. :)

[Morgoth_Bauglir]

Lol I beat ya in 06 too winga with a slower card heh:P
just messing

opteron 146@2940mhz
TEAM BH5@242mhz 2-2-2-5
XFX 7800gtx 256@472/1386
DFI nf4 ultra d


3dmark06 loves dualcore and sm3.0, id have over 5000 with dualcore
4601 morgoth http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=243097

[Winga]

Lol I beat ya in 06 too winga with a slower card heh:P
just messing

opteron 146@2940mhz
TEAM BH5@242mhz 2-2-2-5
XFX 7800gtx 256@472/1386
DFI nf4 ultra d


3dmark06 loves dualcore and sm3.0, id have over 5000 with dualcore
4601 morgoth http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=243097

:bawling: your opty should kick my +3500 venice's **se at the best of times and your 7800GTX is pretty close to the 7900GT so I can understand how you managed that so easily. :)
But wait...I shall be running two of those babies in SLI and am working on overclocking my Venice...then there shall be war :rarr:

[primesuspect]

5669
Athlon 64 X2 5000+ @ stock
Radeon X1900XT 512mb @ stock
2gb OCZ PC6400 "special ops" @ stock

http://www.short-media.com/images/prime/3dm06oct2006.png

[csimon]

5888
Opteron 165 @ 2853mhz
XFX 7950GT @ 610|1600mhz
2gb Mushkin PC4000XP "redline" @ 260mhz

[DanG]

Not too shabby. I could probably have squeezed a few more points if I had done a defrag and killed some of the extra services and processes.

[RWB]

What framerate are you getting on those CPU tests?

[DanG]

What framerate are you getting on those CPU tests?


No idea. Next time I run it, I'll make a point of not covering that part up on the screenshot.

[RWB]

That would be super! Thanks ;)

[DanG]

As requested.

[RWB]

So only about 1fps on that kick ass CPU? I think my laptop's 2GHz P-M does just as good, I know my 2GHz Athlon X2 was almost getting 2 or 3fps IIRC. Gonna have to see if I can find those scores since I don't have that computer anymore.

Well maybe not...and this was 2.5GHz. I must have been thinking at it's high point instead of average. 6 hours sleep over 72 hours maybe making me delirious.

CPU Tests
CPU1 - Red Valley 0.584 FPS
CPU2 - Red Valley 0.914 FPS

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=672633

[csimon]

http://service.futuremark.com/orb/resultanalyzer.jsp?projectType=14&XLID=0&UID=8143289

Opteron 165 @ 2892mhz
XFX 7950GT @ 670|1750mhz
2gb Mushkin PC4000XP "redline" @ 263mhz

My personal best so far.

3DMark Score 6319 3DMarks
SM 2.0 Score 2614 Marks
SM 3.0 Score 2586 Marks
CPU Score 2183 Marks

[jeremywrx]

was wondering if this is a good mark for my built on a budget, overclocking system.

P D805 @ 3500mhz (water cooled)
Gigabyte 945 S3 mobo
1 GB geil ultra ddr800
600watt icute modular psu
palit 7600gs sonic ddr3 @ 515 core 800 mem.

3196 on 3dmark06.

looking around on here that looks alright for a relatively low end system?

are there any other real bang for your buck overclocking cards around? i love a challenge :)

[mirage]

I got 6024 with X1950XT-256MB @ 675/2030, Opteron 165 @ 2.8GHz, 2GB DDR500.

[ronbo]

What are benchmark scores for? I have never run a benchmark. I will install a new game and max it out. If it runs fine, then good. If not, I upgrade. :confused:

[mirage]

I have never run a benchmark.
Amnesia I guess. See post #52 on page 3 :bigggrin:

What are benchmark scores for? I will install a new game and max it out. If it runs fine, then good. If not, I upgrade. :confused:
Just like a chronometer on the race track, helps measuring how much better the system performs after overclocking and tweaking ;)

[ronbo]

Sorry, I did run it one time...had to see if mine was bigger then theirs....you win.

[Bio-Hazard]

The best I've done with my little ole 7900GT is:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=2302161

<TABLE class=dataTable cellSpacing=3 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=tableLabel vAlign=top width="50%">3DMark Score</TD><TD class=tableValue vAlign=top>5732 3DMarks</TD></TR><TR><TD background=/images/orb/pattern_hline.gif colSpan=2>http://service.futuremark.com/images/1x1pix.gif</TD></TR><TR><TD class=tableLabel vAlign=top>SM 2.0 Score</TD><TD class=tableValue vAlign=top>2213 Marks</TD></TR><TR><TD background=/images/orb/pattern_hline.gif colSpan=2>http://service.futuremark.com/images/1x1pix.gif</TD></TR><TR><TD class=tableLabel vAlign=top>SM 3.0 Score</TD><TD class=tableValue vAlign=top>2188 Marks</TD></TR><TR><TD background=/images/orb/pattern_hline.gif colSpan=2>http://service.futuremark.com/images/1x1pix.gif</TD></TR><TR><TD class=tableLabel vAlign=top>CPU Score</TD><TD class=tableValue vAlign=top>3007 Marks</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

[-x-1stG3ar]

Result : 2892

Processor: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz
Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GT, 558 MHz / 702 MHz
System Memory :1536 MB
Motherboard : D101GGC

Dont know if thats any good or not. Got down to 0 frames at some points! :(

Dont know how much the 7600GT is OC'able either.

[Bone]

3DMark Score 10935 3DMarks
SM 2.0 Score 4554 Marks
SM 3.0 Score 4815 Marks
CPU Score 3180 Marks

and it seems like that is a good score :-/

i only got an average of 30-40 fps in the graphics test.. seems like I should get more with my setup.

[GnomeWizardd]

Got 9069 with my setup, tying to get over 10k when the newer board comes in

[Sonorous]

12297 is my highest score. One of these colder nights I will open a window and overclock the heck out of my stuff to see what I can really do.

[mas0n]

14,724 is my highest, but I haven't run benchmarks since I got the CPU up to 3825MHz. I'll post the results of that when I get to it. I'm also looking into possible volt-mods for the 8800GT to push it a little higher.

This run was:

Q6600 @ 400x9
8800GT 771/1782/999
4GB PC6400 4-4-4-12
Asus Maximus Formula
Vista x64
http://carothers.info/matthew/Stuph/8800GT.jpg

EDIT:

Same System Specs, but on XP x64 instead of Vista:

Interesting that the majority of the point gap comes from CPU score...

http://carothers.info/matthew/Stuph/q6600+8800GT+XP.jpg

[Harudath]

See signature.

[Thrax]

I get 10078. I'm not sure what's going on.

[Harudath]

Hmm, aye, that's... not good for your setup :S what's your graphics card specs?

[Thrax]

I'll figure this out eventually, but I'm lazy. It's a first-gen 640MB GTS.

[Harudath]

Core/shader/mem clock/temps?

[Thrax]

Stock/stock/stock stock/fine.

[Harudath]

Figures/numbers/digits plx/myeh?

[mas0n]

Finally hit 16K:

http://carothers.info/matthew/Stuph/16K.jpg

Specs for this run were 783/1890/1161 with CPU @ 425x9. Had to give the memory a voltage bump to get it to run @ 1161, from 1.91v to 2.06v. Also upped volts to GPU core from 1.05v to 1.1v. Considering hard mod to get it to ~1.25v

[Harudath]

Finally hit 16K:

http://carothers.info/matthew/Stuph/16K.jpg

Specs for this run were 783/1890/1161 with CPU @ 425x9. Had to give the memory a voltage bump to get it to run @ 1161, from 1.91v to 2.06v. Also upped volts to GPU core from 1.05v to 1.1v. Considering hard mod to get it to ~1.25v

:wow:

[GnomeWizardd]

THAT is insane!

here is my new one

[Harudath]

THAT is insane!

here is my new one

Hmm, you got a higher Aquamark than me, but a lower 3Dmark :tongue:

[GnomeWizardd]

vid card!, i am getting a 8800GTS 640 as soon as my father gets back his 3870 ATI

[Harudath]

Ah, cool :)

[GnomeWizardd]

New one! Finally broke 11k I gotta Se ewhat the SLI system in the otehr room will bring!

[Harudath]

I broke 14k and almost broke 14.1... 14099 3Dmarks :D

[_k_]

Air only not 24/7 stable only 06. I do have 14k+ stable benches though.2530825309

[_k_]

Just inched about every point out of my rig. 3.9CPU and 8800GT Linked at 714/1011. 15452.......MASON YOU ARE MY NEMISISISISISSSSIIISSISISIS

[mas0n]

Just inched about every point out of my rig. 3.9CPU and 8800GT Linked at 714/1011. 15452.......MASON YOU ARE MY NEMISISISISISSSSIIISSISISIS


http://carothers.info/matthew/Stuph/16828.JPG

:nudge:

[mertesn]

The system:
MSI P6N Diamond (nForce 680i SLI)
Intel Q6600 2.4GHz
2GB (2x1GB) Platinum Rev 2 DDR2-800
eVGA 8800GT KO Edition (Factory OC'ed to 675/1950 MHz Core/RAM)
XFX 8800GT XXX Alpha Dog (Factory OC'ed to 670/1950 MHz Core/RAM)
Monitor: 61" Samsung DLP. Not important to the benchmark, but still cool - especially when playing Bioshock.

I have not overclocked anything in this system yet, but I am working on replacing the stock cooling for just about everything. CPU has a Thermalright Ultra120 Extreme on it, and the GPUs will probably get some HRT-03s after the LAN.

One question - The benchmark doesn't list the second video card. How would I tell whether they're both working in the benchmark?

[Harudath]

If you OC'd that CPU you could get some sick scores

[TheLostSwede]

Built a nice lan rig for a customer. The bloody board does 470fsb with a quad and 8gb of ram.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=7002603

[csimon]

Built a nice lan rig for a customer. The bloody board does 470fsb with a quad and 8gb of ram.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=7002603
64bit vista? What's he gonna use that machine for?

[TheLostSwede]

64bit vista? What's he gonna use that machine for?

The same things as he would have used Vista 32 with.

[_k_]

20000 even, top dog

[mas0n]

20000 even, top dog

pics or it didn't happen. :)


I just want to see SM2, SM3, and CPU scores and I like to know system settings, clocks, etc.

I'm hitting 18K with the HD4870; not bad for a single card :D I'll post a result later.

[_k_]

257812578225783

q9450 @ 3.9; 1:1 ratio to CPU bus with ram(DDR3 2GB); EVGA & XFX 88GT G92 at 675/1700/979~~; 1280x1024; Llama Power Activated.

[RyderOCZ]

Keep trying ;)

http://www.ocztechnologyforum.com/staff/ryderocz/790i/3d06_20479.jpg

[_k_]

Are you maxed? How high have you gotten your bus before it wallz!?

[bullzisnipr]

ok, i wanna see pictures of your cards, how on earth did you get those scores with those cards :eek: i dont doubt at all you did it, but do you guys have water cooling?

[_k_]

AIR

[bullzisnipr]

thats rather impressive... ill add my 4870 this week when it arrives :p

[mas0n]

http://carothers.info/matthew/Stuph/790-1100@3915.png


Q6600 435x9 on water | DDR2 870 5-4-5-18 | ASUS MAXIMUS SE | HD4870 790/1100 on stock cooler :cheers:

[Sledgehammer70]

Anyone still using this benchmark? or has most people jumped to 3dMark Vantage?

[_k_]

Some people are still using it because Vista was required to run Vantage until Win7 was pushed out. I assume its going to go the way of the previous years 3dMarks now.

[Sledgehammer70]

New 3Dmark score...

[_k_]

You can do better. If I ever step my folding down I will buy a larger PSU and run dual GX2s, oh the scores.