Vista Prices Leaked On Amazon [Archive]

profdlp

29 Aug 2006, 09:37pm

Not exactly bargain basement prices.

FULL versions (all prices Canadian)
�Windows Vista Ultimate $499
�Windows XP Professional w/SP2 $429
�Windows Vista Business $379
�Windows Vista Home Premium $299
�Windows Vista Home Basic $259
�Windows XP Home w/SP2 $259

UPGRADE versions (all prices Canadian)
�Windows Vista Ultimate Upgrade $299
�Windows XP Professional w/SP2 Upgrade $259
�Windows Vista Business Upgrade $249
�Windows Vista Home Premium Upgrade $199
�Windows Vista Home Basic Upgrade $129
�Windows XP Home w/SP2 Upgrade $129

We Say: Vista Ultimate is $499 CDN? That�s $449 U.S. I can see I�ll only be getting it with a new PC.
http://www.short-media.com/images/newsimages/2006/August/amazonvista_02.jpg

Link to currency exchange rate calculator. (http://www.xe.com/ucc/)

Source: RealTechNews (http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3424)

RWB

29 Aug 2006, 10:51pm

If those are the prices, I think I can hold off on Vista for quite some time.

muddocktor

29 Aug 2006, 11:09pm

If those are the prices, I think I can hold off on Vista for quite some time.

Like forever, I hope. :D

airbornflght

30 Aug 2006, 12:08am

Why did windows XPs prices get upgraded? I wont be buying this OS. (and MS wonders why their stuff is pirated) if could be to the fact that you have to whip out a handful of c notes to pay for it.

Edit:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/search/102-0360847-5316953?search-alias=software&keywords=Windows%20Vista
it looks like Jan 30th is the date.

profdlp

30 Aug 2006, 12:26am

Prices in USD, courtesy of airbornflght's link:

fatcat

30 Aug 2006, 01:52am

will the ultimate vista upgrade work on windows xp corperate? :bigggrin:

airbornflght

30 Aug 2006, 02:58am

will the ultimate vista upgrade work on windows xp corperate? :bigggrin:

Lets hope so, wait, nevermind. I am not buying it until M$ can pull their heads out and offer it at a reasonable price. I think $250 for the ultimate is fair, and then down from there $400...pfft. Thats only a months paycheck. Who do they think they are selling this too, Bill?

airbornflght

30 Aug 2006, 03:01am

I guess they are leaving it up? Or does amazon not know about this yet. usually, companies tend to find out about this stuff rather quickly.

Daxx

30 Aug 2006, 03:22am

Run boys....run.

profdlp

30 Aug 2006, 03:26am

Run boys....run.
See boys run.

Daxx

30 Aug 2006, 03:28am

See boys run.
See boys run fast.

csimon

30 Aug 2006, 04:43am

How much is OEM and which one do I want?

airbornflght

30 Aug 2006, 04:57am

I dont like having 10 different versions....for god sakes.

FoldingAddict

30 Aug 2006, 07:28am

Considering the billions Microsoft has spent on Vista's development, I think it's a bargain.

~FA

RWB

30 Aug 2006, 08:23am

Quick question came to mind, my cousin mentioned that his Windows XP upgrade install disk only asked for his Windows 98 CD Key and installed a full version... is that how this works? If so I'll do the upgrade, but I don't wanna install XP and then install Vista upgrade, I don't see any good coming from that.

Thrax

30 Aug 2006, 12:04pm

It asks to see the CD. That's it.

Armo

30 Aug 2006, 01:36pm

its bloated, slow, can lock up your data forever if you dont know what your doing, has features no normal person wouldnt need, lacks features enthusiests want, put a "security blanket" of encryption and lock down for the warm and fuzzies of people who dont know what a computer is, has a play skool interface.

if they rolled out a patch/SP that changed the NTFS partition limits, or at least allowed GPD disks, XP pro would be perfect in my opinion.

lemonlime

30 Aug 2006, 06:32pm

Whatever happened to the '$99 Operating System' (Vista Basic) that they were promising?

The full retail software versions cost a ridiculous amount of money. I really dislike the way the OEM licence works (especially for people like me who upgrade frequently). I was hoping that the full-retail versions of Vista would be priced significantly lower than XP.

jradmin

30 Aug 2006, 08:18pm

Wow, I guess this is how Bill funds his foundation. That $449 sure will put alot of micro-chips in the arms of hookers worldwide.

Daxx

30 Aug 2006, 08:39pm

MS is always over charging. We discuss this at work constantly and have not been able to figure out why MS does not offer any kind of family licensing plan. A plan where home users could purchase a license at a discount that would work for 3 to 4 computers. I've got 4 running now - one for me, wife, and one each for twin 14 year old boys. I need a FREAKIN' FAMILY OS PLAN, MICROSOFT!!

Additionally, the price gouging drives, nay, FUELS the black market. I think MS could make even MORE money if they would just be reasonable with pricing to home users, and I'm not talking about selling a whittled down version of their power software at a reduced price. Give us the full power version at fair, home user, or family plan pricing. I've never seen anything like this before! Most corps get a volume discount so they actually pay less than us poor folks trying to put our kids though college with ungodly expensive OS's on their computers. It makes me sick.

Bring on the black market. Down with MICROSOFT!!! Oppressor of the common man!!

Okay, I'm done venting. Now, I gotta save up for Vista. :banghead:

profdlp

30 Aug 2006, 09:42pm

They will sell you additional licenses (see the pic in Post #5) for 90CDN (about $80 US). That ain't cheap, but it is about $50 off the regular price.

Daxx

30 Aug 2006, 09:54pm

They will sell you additional licenses (see the pic in Post #5) for 90CDN (about $80 US). That ain't cheap, but it is about $50 off the regular price.
$159 DVD-Upgrade, $143 for 3 additional licenses for a total of $458 for an UPGRADE - not even full version... NOT my idea of a family pack. Microshaft really knows how to stick it to ya.

airbornflght

31 Aug 2006, 02:55am

Daxx

31 Aug 2006, 03:01am

Im sure they have worked out the economics of it, being the relation between price per copy, and copies sold. So they could probably care less if me and you buy a copy, because there are others that will, not to mention the OEMs.
WHAT?!?! Microsoft doesn't CARE if us little guys don't buy a copy? Say it isn't SO!!! I am such a fool. :rolleyes:

WuGgaRoO

31 Aug 2006, 04:44am

peep this....
1) you could build a rig on dell.com for about 800 or less
2) that means thatyou pay about 500 bucks for a new comp (if you extract the cost of windows vista)
3) MS KNOWS that vista will only work with state of the art machines
4) To save their butts they make the price wayyy too high, so people end up buying newer machines too
5) Windows vista can run properly due to the new machinery
6) MS doesn't look like a team of jackbutts cuz their OS is as slow as mollassis
4)

Nightwolf

31 Aug 2006, 10:58pm

I'm going to linux.

airbornflght

31 Aug 2006, 11:35pm

Slackware is looking really nice.

And yes, the new OS will demand better hardware, but is that there fault, when hasnt a new os had higher hardare requirements. That is only natural. Do people expect a new OS to run on old hardware as good as XP did? I hope not.

I've seen XP run on a system that I didnt think it was going to, and it ran well, not fast, but well. It was a Pentium 2 with 64megs of ram. Try that with vista.

Thrax

1 Sep 2006, 02:23am

A minor increase in RAM requirements is to be expected. Quintupling the at-boot memory footprint is absurd.

Vista is Windows XP Service Pack 3 with a bunch of useless crap and the DRM PLUS! pack.

RWB

1 Sep 2006, 03:10am

A minor increase in RAM requirements is to be expected. Quintupling the at-boot memory footprint is absurd.

Vista is Windows XP Service Pack 3 with a bunch of useless crap and the DRM PLUS! pack.

I am glad the newer version uses half the memory the last version did. 450+\-MB vs 900MB+

I'll be trying to move into Linux, but it ain't gonna happen. Too many programs I depend on require MS and I paid too much for them to switch to a free variant I have no time in learning.

primesuspect

1 Sep 2006, 09:47am

Vista is Windows XP Service Pack 3 with a bunch of useless crap and the DRM PLUS! pack.

Usually you present your opinion-based arguments with well-rationed logic behind them - but this is below your standards. Vista is quite a bit more than a service pack to XP. It's almost a complete re-write. Dig into it a bit more than a superficial layer, explore the aspects that affect, say, the MCSE skills; the more technical side of things, and you must agree that your assertion is quite an understatement.

Thrax

1 Sep 2006, 12:22pm

Rewrite or not, many of the features that made WinV a unique and new operating system have been stripped from the operating system to meet a deadline rather than developmental excellence or a uniqueness worthy of purchase. The big one, of course, is the lack of WinFS which was set to significantly accelerate file access and management in a quick, open-source language.

Consider its new features:
-Desktop widgets
-IE7
-Aero
-WMP11
-Windows Mail, Calendar
-A centralized control panel
-Prefetching often-used programs to memory
-Updated task manager
-Support for NVFlash drives
-A replacement for netmeeting

And some trusted computing nonsense, including locking down the kernel from security vendors; while an admirable goal to keep the kernel away from everyone, not letting security vendors have access to it will only leave the black hats the luxury of doing as they please... And they will. More than that, the HDCP requirement of Vista is a slap in the face to anyone buying video cards or monitors today, as is BitLocker, the valiant effort to permit people to encrypt their files.... Only if they buy the $299 or $399 editions.

These are touted as the major features of Windows Vista, as seen on the Microsoft pages regarding their new baby. Look at each of those, and honestly tell me they couldn't be distributed in another 125-175mb service pack. All of their features, as listed there, could be provided via simple software packages, new services or new drivers. Many of the features in Windows Vista can already be done with Windows XP, for less memory than Vista demands.

From widgets, to new mail and conferencing clients to new devices, Aero and WMP11... All of it can be done, right now, on Windows XP.

Is Windows Vista still anything more than Service Pack 3 which took an exceptionally long time to develop at the expense of all its really innovative features? I'm not so sure.

RWB

2 Sep 2006, 02:32am

Wow... I agree with Thrax now. Vista is purty but it does scare me.

muddocktor

2 Sep 2006, 03:41am

Usually you present your opinion-based arguments with well-rationed logic behind them - but this is below your standards. Vista is quite a bit more than a service pack to XP. It's almost a complete re-write. Dig into it a bit more than a superficial layer, explore the aspects that affect, say, the MCSE skills; the more technical side of things, and you must agree that your assertion is quite an understatement.

I also agree with Thrax too. Let's look at his list of Vista features:

-Desktop widgets - Something I haven't used yet, so I'm not missing it anyways. I imagine you can find some kind of add-on for XP to do this function if you want some widgets.

-IE7 - Future upgrade for XP anyways. I've recently looked at this abortion and didn't like it's interface layout. Micorsoft in their infinite wisdom decided to change the interface around to be different from the other browsers, to IE7's detriment IMO.

-Aero - Haven't messed with it and don't need it anyways (bloatware)

-WMP11 - future upgrade for XP

-Windows Mail, Calendar - big whoop. I'm presently happy with my present mail client.

-A centralized control panel - Another feature that I really don't need. I know where to go in my present control panel well enough, thank you.

-Prefetching often-used programs to memory - Might be useful, but at the expense of a larger memory footprint, necessitating more ram. More ram=more money to run.

-Updated task manager - Might be useful

-Support for NVFlash drives - Might be useful

-A replacement for netmeeting - Another big whoop. I imagine that 99% of home users will never need something like this anyways. Maybe large businesses could use something like this though.

And like Thrax said about all the trusted computing nonsense, I agree also. And add in all the extra DRM baggage that Billy-Boy is throwing into Vista, and it looks much less atractive than sticking with XP to me.

Now if only Apple would release OSX for systems other than their overpriced hardware........:vimp:

Thrax

2 Sep 2006, 03:44am

[H]ard|OCP's recent review of Pre-RC1 has also concluded that it's a perfected Windows XP; tweaks, adjustments and revisions that could've been implemented on XP. Revisions that make the OS convenient, but not worthy of replacing a licensed copy of XP with.

primesuspect

2 Sep 2006, 05:25am

I'm not talking about superficial things. I'm talking about exciting features like scripting (http://www.microsoft.com/technet/windowsvista/scripting/default.mspx), which can help with some of the crazy group policy things that big active directory networks need. That also brings to mind some of the new GPOs (http://www.microsoft.com/technet/windowsvista/library/gpol/a8366c42-6373-48cd-9d11-2510580e4817.mspx?mfr=true) like assigning printers based on location, device lockout based on priveldges, and (the thing I am most excited about): group policy-based QOS. These things couldn't be "tacked on" to WinXP without a network stack rewrite. At that point, it's a different OS. The network stack has been completely rewritten from scratch. The other thing that I am REALLY excited about is WIM, the new imaging format.

You're looking at it from an end-user standpoint. I'm looking at how much easier it will be to deploy and manage 20-30 systems using Vista.

Some other features of interest to sysadmins:

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/windowsvista/evaluate/overvw.mspx

Thrax

2 Sep 2006, 05:47am

Alternatively, however, consider the TCO of Windows Vista. It's not just an OS this time, it's the outlandish hardware requirements to support even the basic features. It's absurd.

The administrative functions are pretty nice, I agree, but at what cost? I feel as though it's very, very high.

primesuspect

2 Sep 2006, 06:34am

muddocktor

2 Sep 2006, 09:03pm

Hey prime, if you are interested in it, I read the other day that M$ opened the latest build for downloading again, for 100,000 downloads. If you hurry, you might still be able to get it if you want to play with it.

primesuspect

2 Sep 2006, 09:15pm

Yeah that's the one I grabbed. I'm using it right now, and plan on putting it on my wife's laptop.

Daxx

3 Sep 2006, 03:35am

I also disagree. I'd say 80% of my customer's computers are ready to run vista as is. Most computers made within the last two years are ready for vista right now.

I've noticed many people mistaking "Running Vista" with "Running Aero Glass". If you turn off Aero Glass, it can run on old hardware.

I'm about to install the pre-rc1 build on my wife's laptop. 512mb ram, pentium M 1.3ghz, radeon mobility 9000. I'm willing to bet it will run just fine, perhaps not with Aero Glass, but well enough.
I disagree. If your system cannot run all the features of a new OS, up to and including Aero Glass, with it's present hardware, then your system is not VISTA ready. That's like saying your vehicle is flex fuel ready as long as you first remove the ethanol from the gas before you use it.

primesuspect

3 Sep 2006, 03:38am

I don't think corporate users need aero glass to be able to check their email while at the same time their administrator can enforce policy-based printer usage.

Daxx

3 Sep 2006, 04:01am

I don't think corporate users need aero glass to be able to check their email while at the same time their administrator can enforce policy-based printer usage.
Regardless of what is needed or it's intended use by various end users, if the system cannot utilize all the features of the new OS, then it is not Vista ready. Indisputably, Vista can be run on non-Vista ready systems with some features disabled; however, to truly be considered a Vista ready machine, all features must be supported.

profdlp

3 Sep 2006, 04:14am

I think the thing to keep in mind is that Microsoft is trying to meet the needs and wishes of disparate groups of users, knowing full well that not every user is going to be interested in every feature. Have a great machine and want glitz? They put it in there. Have specific business needs? They put that in there too.

Think about all the features in WinXP (or Win98, or Win95, rtc) that you don't - and won't ever - use. They could lop off Outlook Express, WMP, IE, and a bunch of things and I would not care one hoot. Other users might consider those features critical.

To me, it seems that they've done a fairly good job of trying to include something for everyone. Like any other consumer item, look for a product which has all the features you need, most or all of the features you want, and ignore the stuff you don't care about. I don't have any use for the ashtray in the back seat area of my car, but that doesn't mean the vehicle was a bad deal for me.

Daxx

3 Sep 2006, 04:40am

I don't have any use for the ashtray in the back seat area of my car, but that doesn't mean the vehicle was a bad deal for me.
I'm going outside to stick a "Nascar Ready" sticker on my Honda Civic and head on over to the race track.

fatcat

3 Sep 2006, 05:46am

I'm going outside to stick a "Nascar Ready" sticker on my Honda Civic and head on over to the race track.

actually if u do a fuel strategy and can maintain minimum speeds you might have a good shot at winning:Pwned:

Daxx

3 Sep 2006, 03:05pm

actually if u do a fuel strategy and can maintain minimum speeds you might have a good shot at winning:Pwned:
Now that would be cool. Could you just see the look on those racer's faces when the Civic cruises through the checkered flag! :cool:

profdlp

3 Sep 2006, 05:33pm

Just to stir the pot a little:

Five Great Features in Windows Vista RC1 (http://www.winsupersite.com/showcase/winvista_rc1_best.asp)

primesuspect

3 Sep 2006, 08:54pm

Also: Solitaire is WAY, WAY cooler on Vista :crazy:

profdlp

3 Sep 2006, 10:28pm

As the reigning world champion in computer solitaire, I have to ask in what way is it cooler?

primesuspect

3 Sep 2006, 11:26pm

enhanced graphics and sounds, plus a neat feature that sends all possible cards home if you right click. When you have all the cards lined up right, and you right click, it is an extremely satisfying rush of all cards home. Ah :D

profdlp

3 Sep 2006, 11:42pm

enhanced graphics and sounds...
What sounds? A "cooler" drip..drip... noise? :vimp:

...plus a neat feature that sends all possible cards home if you right click. When you have all the cards lined up right, and you right click, it is an extremely satisfying rush of all cards home. Ah :D
You can do that in WinXP! ;)

primesuspect

4 Sep 2006, 12:18am

But trust me, it's better in Vista Solitaire... :eek3:

profdlp

4 Sep 2006, 12:23am

But trust me, it's better in Vista Solitaire... :eek3:
Now you have me curious. It's going on a spare rig tomorrow. :ninja:

Daxx

4 Sep 2006, 04:26am

Now you have me curious. It's going on a spare rig tomorrow. :ninja:
Is your spare rig Vista Ready? If not, just slap a Vista Ready sticker on the side of the computer and your good to go! Solitare will look great, but don't pull that sticker off, because that will definately reduce your solitare viewing pleasure in Vista. The Vista Ready sticker is ultra powerful...never forget that.

Thrax

4 Sep 2006, 04:33am

A new version of solitaire! Another feature that should be available in Windows XP SP3. ;)

Daxx

4 Sep 2006, 04:36am

A new version of solitaire! Another feature that should be available in Windows XP SP3. ;)
Ditto.:hitit2:
Service Pack 3, code name Vista.

airbornflght

4 Sep 2006, 04:38am

Is SP3 even coming?

Thrax

4 Sep 2006, 04:45am

Eventually, yes. Mum's the word, however it's been theorized at February/March, a few months after the consumer release of WinV.

profdlp

4 Sep 2006, 04:48am

...it's been theorized at February/March, a few months after the consumer release of WinV.
What year? :vimp:

Daxx

4 Sep 2006, 04:50am

What year? :vimp:
In the year of Service Pack 3...duh. :doh:

Thrax

4 Sep 2006, 04:50am

An excellent question. DEATH TO VISTA! RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE.

Daxx

4 Sep 2006, 05:16am

http://home.comcast.net/~dlancep/vista_death.jpg

Enverex

4 Sep 2006, 02:48pm

It makes me wonder why the requirements are so high... it's also quite worrying. It seems as if coders are going with the 'all out no matter how unoptimised and how high the requirements are' approach. XGL on Linux can do most if not more things than Aero can do on Vista, but doesn't have insane hardware requirements, infact it will run on quite old 3D cards quite happily. My main concern here is that it's going to be a slippery slope. Requirements for things start increasing exponentially, forgetting about trying to squeeze the last bit of performance out of older things (which in turn would make it more efficient on newer hardware anyway) and just relying on the brute force of better hardware to pull things through at an acceptable pace. This makes matters worse as then with the OS taking up so much of the system, the requirements for things to run ON the OS will in turn be higher due to a large amount of resources already in use...

Enverex

4 Sep 2006, 03:53pm

Just to stir the pot a little:

Five Great Features in Windows Vista RC1 (http://www.winsupersite.com/showcase/winvista_rc1_best.asp)

I'm going to have to comment on this...

1. "The USB memory device must meet certain performance and storage characteristics (2.5MB/sec throughput for 4K random reads and 1.75MB/sec throughput for 512K random writes; 64 MB to 8 GB of free space; 256 MB of overall storage or more)". He totes this as a viable way to add RAM to your PC. I just couldn't keep a straight face. Your HD's virtual RAM/Pagefile will far surpass this in speed so I don't see how this does anything other than slow your PC down further and it would cost you to do it. Seems lose/lose to me.

2. "Vista's search technologies are better than that offered by competitors". Someone has obviously never used Beagle (which I may add has also been around a lot longer and also has the ability to search through your other personal things such as address books, emails, etc. Nice feature but it should be there by default to be honest.

3. Media Center? It's going to be nice for old people and kids that use their machine but how many of us "experienced users" like using Windows Media Player? I'm guessing less when it becomes even larger.

4. Windows Photo Gallery. A nice feature but not something that stands out and not something that isn't already provided by at least a dozen other programs, of which anyone that wants the feature will likely already have one of those programs and prefer it to the 'to be implemented' Vista version.

5. ... the fact it installs is a 'great feature'? That's a little concerning, it's something I would have taken for granted, although, given XPs track record with my RAID SATA drives it may be a nice change.

Just a few thoughts.

primesuspect

4 Sep 2006, 05:42pm

I'm going to have to comment on this...

1. "The USB memory device must meet certain performance and storage characteristics (2.5MB/sec throughput for 4K random reads and 1.75MB/sec throughput for 512K random writes; 64 MB to 8 GB of free space; 256 MB of overall storage or more)". He totes this as a viable way to add RAM to your PC. I just couldn't keep a straight face. Your HD's virtual RAM/Pagefile will far surpass this in speed so I don't see how this does anything other than slow your PC down further and it would cost you to do it. Seems lose/lose to me.

I tried it last night, I have a fairly new, nice OCZ Rally2 (http://www.ocztechnology.com/products/flash_drives/ocz_rally2_usb_2_0_dual_channel_flash_memory_drive), which is supposed to be very fast, and when I tried ReadyBoost, windows told me the drive wouldn't perform fast enough to be used for this, so I can't really comment on this except to say "what the hell kind of flash memory do they WANT for this?"

2. "Vista's search technologies are better than that offered by competitors". Someone has obviously never used Beagle (which I may add has also been around a lot longer and also has the ability to search through your other personal things such as address books, emails, etc. Nice feature but it should be there by default to be honest.

Totally agree.

3. Media Center? It's going to be nice for old people and kids that use their machine but how many of us "experienced users" like using Windows Media Player? I'm guessing less when it becomes even larger. Don't confuse Media Center with Media Player. Media Center is REALLY NICE for HTPCs. Having it integrated is very, very cool.

4. Windows Photo Gallery. A nice feature but not something that stands out and not something that isn't already provided by at least a dozen other programs, of which anyone that wants the feature will likely already have one of those programs and prefer it to the 'to be implemented' Vista version.

I use a combination of DxO Optics Pro and Picasa 2 for my photo management stuff. While Picasa 2 is nice, I tried out Windows Photo Gallery, and I think I will switch over to it. It's kind of a step above Picasa, yet a step below something like Extensis Portfolio.

5. ... the fact it installs is a 'great feature'? That's a little concerning, it's something I would have taken for granted, although, given XPs track record with my RAID SATA drives it may be a nice change.

Just a few thoughts.

The installation is much improved over XP. I've installed Vista about four times now and it has been very smooth.

Just some of my thoughts :)

Daxx

4 Sep 2006, 05:46pm

Don't confuse Media Center with Media Player. Media Center is REALLY NICE for HTPCs. Having it integrated is very, very cool.
Just curious, have you used the Media Center for HTPC? What features does it have? Does it record in open format or DRM? The reason I ask is because I just bought BeyondTV and I'm getting ready to build up an HTPC and I am wondering if maybe the Vista Media Center will be better.

primesuspect

4 Sep 2006, 05:54pm

From what I've seen so far, Vista Media Center is the same as the current Windows XP MCE that is out, but with a slightly different interface.

Yes, it uses DRM - if recording content that contains one of those 'broadcast flags', it will restrict the content based on what the broadcaster tells - i.e. you can't copy it, or redistrubute, etc.

profdlp

4 Sep 2006, 06:54pm

QCH2002

8 Sep 2006, 10:14pm

WinXP stated it could be run on a 300 MHz PII but no one in their right mind would do so unless they turned off all the fancy stuff (Fading, slidine menues, etc.). Until you had at least 256 MB and a PIII 1.0 GHZ could you start to be able to make XP look flashier.

Vista is the same. It will determine the best settings to maximize performance. My place of employment will be installing Vista on systems all the way down to 1.0 GHz. It has worked so far on our test stands. Will it be slow, yes but it will work for 50% of our general workers.

RWB

9 Sep 2006, 04:12am

I turned off alot of the enhancements, all of the visual ones at least and not much changed in terms of memory being used.

Daxx

9 Sep 2006, 04:13am

Will it be slow, yes but it will work for 50% of our general workers.
So 50% of your general workers will now be working slower? Hurrah for VISTA!! :clap:

RWB

9 Sep 2006, 04:55am

I hate it when a company forces you to work on a slow POS, it does just as Daxxx mentioned, slows you down, and cuases unneeded irritation.

QCH2002

13 Sep 2006, 02:29am

So 50% of your general workers will now be working slower? Hurrah for VISTA!! :clap:
Nope much... in fact, with Office 2007 features, it might save some time due to added sharing features. I hate it when a company forces you to work on a slow POS, it does just as Daxxx mentioned, slows you down, and cuases unneeded irritation.Considering we're a government funded research facility with VERY limited budgets... we try to get by as long as we can while keeping the system under MS support (Windows 2000 is "End of Life").