PDA

View Full Version : Best Folding setup for 8 cores


primesuspect
31 Mar 2008, 09:33pm
I have a new toy. 2x Xeon E5450s (2ghz) = 8 cores

Windows 2003 64bit

What is the best folding setup for this beast? It will be folding 24/7 for team 93.

mertesn
31 Mar 2008, 09:54pm
Four instances of the SMP client. Be sure to use the Folding Affinity Changer too!

mas0n
31 Mar 2008, 10:22pm
:eek: Nice!

Qeldroma
1 Apr 2008, 12:46am
I have a new toy. 2x Xeon E5450s (2ghz) = 8 cores

Windows 2003 64bit

What is the best folding setup for this beast? It will be folding 24/7 for team 93.

I thought the E5450s (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819117141) were 3.0GHz?

Regardless- SUHWEET!

primesuspect
1 Apr 2008, 12:55am
Oopsie.. Transposed a 0 and a 5.

E5405 -2ghz, 6mb cache x2

mmonnin
1 Apr 2008, 01:01am
I dont know if the Afinity Changer works with that many cores. /shrug. I havent checked for a newer version but it could now. Try what mersesn said.

Leonardo
1 Apr 2008, 01:15am
Woohoo! This should be fun for you to play with and fun for us to watch.

pragtastic
1 Apr 2008, 02:30am
Woohoo! This should be fun for you to play with and fun for us to watch.

^ Mistakenly copied from a random moment of IRC.

FreeC8675
1 Apr 2008, 03:08am
That should kick out some serious PPD! Good luck getting everything up and running!

primesuspect
1 Apr 2008, 03:20am
First fail:

I can't get the deinos MPI or whatever it is to work right, i have a feeling that it's because this is locked down Win2003 Server.

There's something, security-wise, that is bitching this up.

More research needed.

Qeldroma
1 Apr 2008, 04:42am
Do you have .NET 2.0 installed?

Here's the easy version. (http://folding.stanford.edu/English/FAQ-SMP#ntoc3)

primesuspect
1 Apr 2008, 06:40am
Yes, I have .net 2 and 3 and all relevant and latest service packs

Qeldroma
1 Apr 2008, 01:03pm
This is a pretty unusual situation and if it gets much more involved and people here don't know, I'd try to work with the Folding Community Forum. You may be reinventing the thread, but there seems to be people there who have worked this configuration and the loss of the previous forum seems to have wiped a lot of that information (?). You should at least get good references there.

As far as securities, I think that if you are working under a different account than that of the client installation you might have to run install.bat again under the account you wish to run. ? Otherwise, I'm not sure here without more insight. Hopefully this helps.

Ultra Nexus
1 Apr 2008, 09:30pm
IŽd go for the VM setup.... I managed to get a competitorŽs (http://www.overclock.net/overclock-net-folding-home-team/296587-vmware-1-0-4-ubuntu-guide.html) folding distro that runs exceptionally good. I can help you out or config it myselff if you grant me remote desktop access to this box.

PM me if youŽd like.

UNex.-

primesuspect
1 Apr 2008, 09:38pm
I can't really do the VM thing. This is a production domain controller in a production environment. For simplicity and stability's sake I'm pretty close to the decision that I'll just run four instances or even eight instances of standard FAH console.

Qeldroma
2 Apr 2008, 03:49am
This is a production domain controller in a production environment. For simplicity and stability's sake I'm pretty close to the decision that I'll just run four instances or even eight instances of standard FAH console.

In which case I have to concur. SMP in this configuration may simply be too maintenance intensive to bother with in a revenue service stream system. Lotsa reasons to keep it as simple as possible- especially if you're doing this for a 3rd party.

Ultra Nexus
2 Apr 2008, 05:35pm
I can't really do the VM thing. This is a production domain controller in a production environment. For simplicity and stability's sake I'm pretty close to the decision that I'll just run four instances or even eight instances of standard FAH console.

I understand. But the idea of using virtual machines is actually to isolate them from the host, making it more maintenance user friendly. The VMs can be directly administered remotely with a VNC client too.

Also, the SMP client in Linux is more efficient not only in PPD production, but it also consumes less CPU cycles (90-95%) which also relates to a lower power consumption and overall temperature of the entire system.

Anyway, if you change your mind, I will gladly assist, you or anyone whoŽd like to experiment with this.