View Full Version : HELP! NF7-S cannot overclock Athlon 2500+ to 3200+
ngfrazier
7 Jan 2004, 8:07am
First, thanks for clicking on this post. Your time and effort is greatly appreciated!
Components: (Mobo+RAM+Proc from newegg received 1/5/2004):
Abit NF7-S
2 x 256MB, PC3200 (Buffalo Tech using Winbond CH-5 chips)
AMD Athlon 2500+ (retail box) with the following codes:
AXDA2500KV4D KO22244l31038
PQZEA0332MPMW
Alpha PAL 8045 Cooled by a 80mm fan
Visiontek Geforce3 Ti 200 (using 41.09 WHQL drivers)
WD 160 GB Special Edition JBRTL
16x DVD Lite-ON IDE
24x CD-RW Yamaha IDE
---powered by an Antec TruePower 430 and enclosed in a CoolerMaster ATC-201
Proceedure:
Upon installing the NF7, I updated to the latest BIOS, overclocked the 2500+ by selecting the 3200+ (three selections are available: 2500+; 3200+, and User Defined)
WinXP Pro + SP1 installed without a hitch under the selected 3200+ (using default voltage). Then, I installed the 3.13 nForce drivers. I noticed that computer would freeze 3-10secs within playing an MP3. Hmm, not good!
Started playing around with BIOS settings, specifically memory timings and voltage settings. After reading in these forums, I upped the Vcore voltage (tried different settings from 1.675->1.8) in order to gain stability. I also increased the VDimm voltage and the chipset voltage in various combinations to no avail. As for the memory timings, I tried all the various settings, from “by SPD” to “Optimal” and “Aggressive.”
At this point, I was not sure where the problem lay: memory or motherboard? So, I downloaded memtest and another memory tester from Microsoft. Memory passed both series of tests (from each program) without error. At this point, I think that the problem is related to the onboard sound (because it would freeze when playing MP3s). So, I disabled the onboard sound and installed Wolfenstein Enemy Territory. Proc is still overclocked and it freezes a couple seconds after joining a server. Went to BIOS, enabled sound and set CPU back to 2500. Game does not freeze, MP3s + DVDs all play fine. I set the memory to asynchronous mode (mem 400 + Proc 333) and all still ran stable.
I have spent many hours changing settings in an attempt to reach around 2.2 ghz (3200+) stable (without games crashing and without getting errors from Prime95). I am disappointed because a friend of mine has a $60 Shuttle nforce2 that ran his 3200+ without a problem. Any advice is welcome.
Bios settings which remained consistent:
SoftMenu III (CPU Interface Enabled)
Advanced BIOS Features Setup (Virus Warning Disabled; APIC enabled)
Advanced Chipset Features (System BIOS Cache Disabled, Video RAM Cache Disabled, CPU Throttling Disabled, ALL Spread-Spectrum Disabled)
Integrated Peripherals (SATA Disabled , FireWire Disabled, Parallel Port Disabled, Serial#2 Disabled)..REST all DEFAULT (but PCI transfer enhanced Disabled)
Necropolis
7 Jan 2004, 8:23am
It sounds like you system may be overheating. What where your temps when running at 3200+? The Alpha Pal was a great heatsink for the older athlon chips but when I put mine on my old 2200+ the temps were stupidly high. You would have been better off getting an SLK-800 or 9** and a good 80mm or 92mm fan.
TheBaron
7 Jan 2004, 8:31am
like nec says, temps would be a good thing to check. try to take a reading while putting load on the CPU (i.e. prime95 or folding@home)
tefleming
7 Jan 2004, 8:32am
Welcome to S-M!
Necro might be on to something, try installing MBM (http://mbm.livewiredev.com).
BUT, my guess is that you'll find that your CH5 chips are holding you back. While the BH5's were amazing, some of the CH5's are having trouble running at stock speeds.
Also, you should probably use the "User Defined" option under BIOS and increase your FSB settings incrementally. (rather than jumping straight from 166->200)
Best of Luck,
PS: One piece of advice, I'd make sure the system is running smoothly at stock speeds (everything: CPU, Mem, Vid, etc) before you begin overclocking.
Jimborae
7 Jan 2004, 4:22pm
The Alpha Pal is easily as good as an SLK 800 when using the same fan. It is by no means past its prime & manages to keep my overclocked XP1800 at 2.2ghz all day at around 40-44c. So doubt heat is the issue unless it was installed incorrectly.
TheLostSwede
7 Jan 2004, 6:38pm
I agree with Jim here. That's a great heatsink.
I played around with a few bioses yesterday. I usually have the first bios, but modded by EQuito, D10. DEAD stable at pretty high overclocks. (11.5X230 SYNC, DC) Never had a reboot or freeze at that setting. Tried bios 20 and Call Of Duty kicked back to desktop within 5 minutes. I'm not saying it has to be the bios that is faulty but it might be worth a check. The CH5 chips isn't that bad actually. The newer ones actually goes as high as BH5 with lots of voltage.
Set the timings to 11,3,2, cas 2,5 (we'll change it later) at 166 fsb in 6/6 (sync), disable the 2 cache options in the bios (video and one more, can't remember the name), set the VDDR (memory voltage) voltage to 2.8, vcvore to 1.85 (we'll lower it later on if possible), 1.6 on the chipset voltage, default on the other voltage.
A couple of questions: Is that cpu unlocked? Can you take a reading of the voltages in the bios? 12V, 5V and 3.3V is all you need to check.
We'll sort this out.
seversphere
7 Jan 2004, 7:55pm
are you able to take a picture of the xp2500?
CPU DISCONNECT is enabled by default. DISABLE it if you haven't already.
TheBaron
7 Jan 2004, 10:53pm
and just remember, looking at the timings mac posted, your ram should also be set at x-x-x-11 on nforce boards, as this yields the best performance out of the memory controller
Preacher
8 Jan 2004, 5:59am
are you able to take a picture of the xp2500?
CPU DISCONNECT is enabled by default. DISABLE it if you haven't already.
serversphere,
this may be a dumb question, but why is disabling this better?
ngfrazier
8 Jan 2004, 6:17am
I appreciate everyone's advice and comments.
First, an update: I suspected that some problems may have been caused from installing windows on an overclocked system. So, in order to eliminate this possibility, I set everything to default speeds and reloaded WinXP + SP1 + drivers (40.72 WHQL'd for Video and the 2.xx nforce downloaded from Abit website). (BTW, my CPU temps at stock are 35-37C)
Now, i attempted to overclock! I followed Mackanz's advice (upped Vcore and Mem. Voltage, set RAM timings, etc...). I knew that my CPU and Mem were stable at default voltage (having run Prime95 on them), so I attempted to gradually OC.
I went from 166 to 173 to 177... it seemed fine until I started to reach the high 180s and 190s. At that point, I OC slowly (2-3 MHz increments). Although I have not been able to fully test each setting (aka >12hrs Prime95) I worked along the principle of finding *unstable* settings rather than proving stable ones. My method was to run Prime95 for about 10-15 mins. Often, this was more than adequate to detect errors. Sadly, at 199 MHz FSB, Prime95 would spit out an error in the first min of testing. The threshold of stability seems to be 195-198 MHz (with vcore increased to >1.8, temps hovered around 47C-51C loaded).
What piece of hardware is to blame? Is it the Mobo or the Proc? RAM maybe? I am fairly sure it is not RAM, as I have tested the module for errors numerous time. As for the Processor, I am left with more questions than answers. According to the CPU code and stepping (AQZEA0332MPMW) the "AQZEA" stepping is not the best nor the worst and should almost guarantee a 3200+ with added voltage. Moreover, having been manufactured the 32nd week of 2003 the multiplier *should* be unlocked--yet it is not!
Lastly, on a side note, how much voltage is too much voltage? Is a Vcore of 1.8v getting dangerous? How about the RAM? Does such an increase only raise the temps, or are their long-term consequences to consider. In other words, at what point should a trade-off be made in voltage to long-term stability (at least 2-3 years)?
Cordially,
Nathan
Did you update the BIOS to the most recent available?
I'm trying to remember and going to do some research....but it seems to me that when you hit 200 fsb you turn on the 1:6 PCI divider. If that is correct (I may have dreamt this, it's late heh.), you would be overclocking your PCI bus anywhere in the range 167-199 fsb, using a 1/5 divider. Thus, at 198 fsb, your peripherals are running at 39.6 PCI bus instead of the intended 33.3, possibly causing problems with things like HD's, CD's, LAN, audio, and so forth. If I'm right, when you hit 200 the divider becomes 6 instead of 5 and thus 200/6=33.3, back in spec. So, going straight to 200 may be fine wheras 199 is a problem.
One more thing, if I am right, and if your HD's don't like 39.6 PCI bus, you may have already corrupted your nice fresh OS install. Aren't I just full of....good news? ;)
I'll try and google this but I'm not sure how to word the search....
Couple of quick searches have not yielded the info I was looking for ...take a shot at 200 and see if it's the same or not.
1.8 vcore should be fine for the processor, if your max loaded temp is 51C. There are many running 1.85 and higher, though over that you would want more advanced cooling.
Memory voltage (Vdimm) is a topic of some debate. I am of the school of thought that it must be almost impossible to kill memory with stock motherboard voltages. I always run my memory at max available on the systems I overclock, meaning 2.85-2.9v 24/7 for months and months on my 2 current rigs. This is not, however, long term testing and I do not know the answer over a 2-3 yr period. I do know of many overclockers who feed 3.1-3.3v to their memory via voltage modding their motherboards and have not seen a story of someone killing their RAM with voltage - tho I give the standard "YMMV" disclaimer.
In your shoes, I would not hesitate to go to 2.8v or even 2.9v with your memory, see if that helps, then work backwards down to stability. But at 200 fsb/PC3200 it's stock RAM setting and absolutely should run stable at stock volts/SPD timings. Voltage increase should be reserved for seeking tighter timings or overclocked speeds.
ngfrazier
8 Jan 2004, 8:22am
A couple of comments:
To TheSmJ: Yes, I update the BIOS to the latest one, though I kinda wonder if it may handicap OC in some way.
To Keto: Thanks for your suggestions. Concerning the PCI bus speeds, I have read that the PCI bus is locked on the nForce2 boards. (See: http://www.overclockers.com/tips00213/ )
This makes me rest a little easier, though I am still determined to figure out which component is hampering my OC. If I pump enough juice to the CPU (say 1.8-1.9) , should that not force it to hit 2.2 ghz unless it is POS?
BTW, could increasing the northbridge voltage help out (and if so, why)?
Thanks
Jimborae
8 Jan 2004, 10:02am
Ok wack the the Northbridge Voltage up to the max (as this will help you attain High fsb speeds) I think the max is 1.9v but I could be wrong.
The AGP frequency is locked on a NF7-S but the pci bus isn't, that is controlled by the divider which for 200+ fsb should be set to 6:6 or anything that gives a 1:1 ratio eg 4:4 or 1:1.
Regards
Jim
Mt_Goat
8 Jan 2004, 11:14am
Default NB voltage is fine to around 225fsb. Raising it will only increase the NB temp and make things less stable and is one of the common mistakes people make. I would try going up to 1.875 as the limit for trying to run a 2500 Barton @ 200fsb with the default mulitplier. As long as the idle temp can stay below 45C and full load less than around 53C I would say it will be good to go.
Jimborae
8 Jan 2004, 11:21am
Default NB voltage is fine to around 225fsb. Raising it will only increase the NB temp and make things less stable and is one of the common mistakes people make.
mtgoat, I think here its a case of suck it & see cos on mine it wont go above 200 on default voltage and will only get to 210 on max, 215-220 with a volt mod. My previous NF7-s would again had to be raised to get above 200 and on max voltage would hit 234fsb.
Mt_Goat
9 Jan 2004, 2:04am
Jim, just because you are having a problem doesn't mean everyone is. My board as wel as 3 others I have set-up have all done 220+ with default NB voltage. Next, I will ask why you must be vulgar with me over this??? I see it as totally uncalled for!!!
PCI bus <b>is most certainly locked</b> on the nForce2.
Jimborae
9 Jan 2004, 9:34am
:eek:
Mtgoat, err I think something has been lost in translation over the pond, if you're refering to my "suck it and see" comment its not meant to be rude or vulgar. All it means in the UK is that you need to try it to see what result you get, it has no rude connotations over here.... unless one's mind is in the gutter. ;)
Therefore I apologise for any offense caused but I promise you none was intended, I dont do that sort of thing unless under extreme provocation.
Regards
Jim
Mt_Goat
9 Jan 2004, 10:55am
:eek:
Mtgoat, err I think something has been lost in translation over the pond, if you're refering to my "suck it and see" comment its not meant to be rude or vulgar. All it means in the UK is that you need to try it to see what result you get, it has no rude connotations over here.... unless one's mind is in the gutter. ;)
Therefore I apologise for any offense caused but I promise you none was intended, I dont do that sort of thing unless under extreme provocation.
Regards
Jim
Apology accepted as well as offering my own as I was the one who forgot the amount of water between us, thus my lack of latitude in the interpretation. :wave: I think 14 hr days are wearing on me! ;)
Jimborae
9 Jan 2004, 11:30am
:topic:
Larry, no problem mate, glad we we got it cleared up, wots that phrase about being seperated by a common language, well I think we just valiadated it. :)
Jimborae
9 Jan 2004, 6:11pm
PCI bus <b>is most certainly locked</b> on the nForce2.
Oopps sorry again, Thrax is right.
The divider just sets the ratio to lock the pci bus at 33MHz, correct??
TheLostSwede
9 Jan 2004, 6:26pm
ngfrazier,
That's still a pretty good overclock that you have. DO NOT use Bios 20. Unstable as grandma on rollerblades. Use Bios 17 if you want a newer bios, or the modded D10 if you want performance (and for me stability). What's the total cpu speed right now?
Weird that your cpu is locked. What happens if you lower the multiplier?
Mack, I've searched around the site but can't find the D10 modded bios file, can you please post or link it? Thx in advance.
TheLostSwede
11 Jan 2004, 9:12pm
Mack, I've searched around the site but can't find the D10 modded bios file, can you please post or link it? Thx in advance.
Rename the B1 and B4 to .ace.
The EQ bios is the one from EQuito, works very well. I'm currently testing the others. B1 and B4 have totally different menu structure and hidden timings setting which you CANNOT change. The "under 10 multi" bandwidth issue is solved with the B1 and B4 bios it seems. Try them at your own risk. They work for me though.
MrBill
11 Jan 2004, 11:07pm
I'm running my NF7-S v2 w/xp2500, SK7 @ 2250mhz. 166x13.5 (cheap ram)
In BIOS:
vCore - 1.85
vDDR - 2.7
chipset - 1.7v
ABIT EQ:
vCore - 1.8
vDDR - 2.7
Haven't really tried to go any higher since it's stable at this speed. :)
Straight_Man
11 Jan 2004, 11:22pm
Where we in America would say sip they can and do say suck (seems to go with British or Samual Adams Ale better (with a good head on it, of malt and alcohol suds, draft, FRESH), while sip they use for VERY VERY hot tea, right, Jimborae??).... "Try a bit at a time and see what happens for you" would be cool for both sides, maybe.....
John.
Thrax
11 Jan 2004, 11:26pm
WTF are you <i>talking</i> about? My god...
Jimborae
12 Jan 2004, 12:11am
:topic:
Where we in America would say sip they can and do say suck (seems to go with British or Samual Adams Ale better (with a good head on it, of malt and alcohol suds, draft, FRESH), while sip they use for VERY VERY hot tea, right, Jimborae??).... "Try a bit at a time and see what happens for you" would be cool for both sides, maybe.....
John.
Well that certainly brought a smile to my face . Urm not quite but nearly John.
I certainly would'nt recommend replacing the word sip with suck in most situations when talking to us British as generally we do use "sip" in most of the same situations as you guys do.
However ,the phrase "suck it & see" has been around for "donkey's years" and has been used in everything, from advertising indegestion tablets to try before you buy offers. But essentianly Ageek's sentiment is correct.
I just, naively, assumed that as its in common language over here it would be the same, and mean the same for you guys.
Apologies for going off topic yet again.
Jim
Preacher
12 Jan 2004, 5:12am
:topic: For what it's worth, Jim, we use the same phrase in the US Navy quite often. I would imagine at some point we picked it up from our Royal Navy allies.
Back on topic, I may be switching to Equito's D10 BIOS. I'm currently using his modified 20 with the SATA drivers and as far as I know it I don't have any stability issues. I'm currently running a 2500+ at 215 FSB on a 11x multiplier for 2365 Mhz in a Koolance system.
ngfrazier
12 Jan 2004, 7:09am
I just wanted to thank all of you for your suggestions and responses. The solution seems to be to raise the Vcore to 1.9v! Unfortunately, this heats the CPU up to 49C idle and 57-59C under load.
As for the other components...
Memory was not holding it back: I tested the memory for errors--it was clean. Next, I set the Proc at default settings (166 FSB) but set the mem async. to 200FSB--it was stable. I then set it higher to about 414 MHz and it was still stable during Prime.
I also tested the Northbridge under default and boosted voltage. Though this is more difficult to test, I have come to the conclusion that you should not increase voltage to the Northbridge (beyond about 1.6v) unless you plan on running beyond stock (like 200+ FSB for Bartons and 133+ for Palominos). The reasoning is to reduce the heat, since once the Northbridge heats up, it will sometimes become flaky.
In conclusion, it seems that I got a POS Barton 2500+, whilst everyone and their grandma got 2500+ Bartons that do 3200+ with little to no Vcore boost. Ah well...
My last concern is twofold:
1) Is a Vcore of 1.9 too high for my Barton 2500+?
2) What temps are too high (59C too high a temp under load)?
Thanks
Preacher
12 Jan 2004, 8:25am
For comparison, my 2500+ temps (215x11.0 with 1.712 volts) are 40c idle and 44C under load. 59 sounds WAY high for any type of stability.
Jimborae
12 Jan 2004, 9:16am
NG, wot type of fan are using with your alpha pal heat sink. Is it a low speed, low noise one? If so then that would explain your high temps. Something like a Delta fan that pushes a lot of air would do but the trade off is noise.
Also for comparison, my temps on my second rig are very similar to yours when running that kind of volage but then i'm using a low speed, low cfm fan.
regards
Jim
TheLostSwede
12 Jan 2004, 7:46pm
I just wanted to thank all of you for your suggestions and responses. The solution seems to be to raise the Vcore to 1.9v! Unfortunately, this heats the CPU up to 49C idle and 57-59C under load.
As for the other components...
Memory was not holding it back: I tested the memory for errors--it was clean. Next, I set the Proc at default settings (166 FSB) but set the mem async. to 200FSB--it was stable. I then set it higher to about 414 MHz and it was still stable during Prime.
I also tested the Northbridge under default and boosted voltage. Though this is more difficult to test, I have come to the conclusion that you should not increase voltage to the Northbridge (beyond about 1.6v) unless you plan on running beyond stock (like 200+ FSB for Bartons and 133+ for Palominos). The reasoning is to reduce the heat, since once the Northbridge heats up, it will sometimes become flaky.
In conclusion, it seems that I got a POS Barton 2500+, whilst everyone and their grandma got 2500+ Bartons that do 3200+ with little to no Vcore boost. Ah well...
My last concern is twofold:
1) Is a Vcore of 1.9 too high for my Barton 2500+?
2) What temps are too high (59C too high a temp under load)?
Thanks
Nah...2 volt works well with stock cooling, just exchange the goop to AS3 or AS5. However, you dont need more than 1.6 up to 220 fsb anyway. Also, the NB doesn't put out much heat at all. 207 is still not a bad overclock at all. Default multi is 11 right? Run it at 200X11 (SYNC) and lower the vcore to 1.85. I bet it's stable.
Degarmo
20 Jan 2004, 7:11am
I have had the same problems with a recently boaght 2500+ Ngfazier. I have decided it is the cpu it's self. I have had 2 other chips a 3000+ and a 2500+ in this mobo (NF7-s) and no problems at all OC'ing. Same memory same settings. Some chips just aren't good overclockers and some are... Thats my viewpoint. But, with that said... If you solve this problem please let me know because I would be very intersted! :vimp:
Degarmo
20 Jan 2004, 7:19am
Hmmm? 1.9Volts just to go 200fsb? Man thats nuts. I never upped mine past 1.7 during testing .. I thought geeze it's only 33Mhz?? The board containing the cpu that has problems like yours is in my V1.0 board... I can only go as high as 1.85vcore on it... I guess I will try it and see if I come up with the same findings as you. Geeze it sounds like I might need that extra .05 volts lol
GHoosdum
21 Jan 2004, 12:08am
I had a similar issue with a 2500+ I had - I got rid of it quickly, and I'm now running a Mobile Athlon XP 2400+ (Barton Core) at 2300MHz, 11.5x200, 1.75VCore, with no problem. It might actually be capable of running 2.3GHz at a lower VCore, but I haven't, eh, 'sucked it to see' yet...
Jimborae
21 Jan 2004, 12:23am
I had a similar issue with a 2500+ I had - I got rid of it quickly, and I'm now running a Mobile Athlon XP 2400+ (Barton Core) at 2300MHz, 11.5x200, 1.75VCore, with no problem. It might actually be capable of running 2.3GHz at a lower VCore, but I haven't, eh, 'sucked it to see' yet...
Yeah, yeah, go on take the mickey for my "faux pas" ;D
speed_x
8 Feb 2004, 8:03am
Hi..speed_x here! :type:
Hi all, I'm new at the forum...here is my 2 cents
Check out this article:
http://www.sudhian.com/showdocs.cfm?aid=307
Hope it helps
speed_x
8 Feb 2004, 8:07am
Hi..speed_x again!
The chip you've got is a good overclocker (AQZEA) you shouldn't need more than 1.7 volts, your voltage is very high just for 200 FSB.
speed_x
8 Feb 2004, 8:18am
I just wanted to thank all of you for your suggestions and responses. The solution seems to be to raise the Vcore to 1.9v! Unfortunately, this heats the CPU up to 49C idle and 57-59C under load.
As for the other components...
Memory was not holding it back: I tested the memory for errors--it was clean. Next, I set the Proc at default settings (166 FSB) but set the mem async. to 200FSB--it was stable. I then set it higher to about 414 MHz and it was still stable during Prime.
I also tested the Northbridge under default and boosted voltage. Though this is more difficult to test, I have come to the conclusion that you should not increase voltage to the Northbridge (beyond about 1.6v) unless you plan on running beyond stock (like 200+ FSB for Bartons and 133+ for Palominos). The reasoning is to reduce the heat, since once the Northbridge heats up, it will sometimes become flaky.
In conclusion, it seems that I got a POS Barton 2500+, whilst everyone and their grandma got 2500+ Bartons that do 3200+ with little to no Vcore boost. Ah well...
My last concern is twofold:
1) Is a Vcore of 1.9 too high for my Barton 2500+?
2) What temps are too high (59C too high a temp under load)?
Thanks
The stepping you've got is one of the best for overclocking!
Go slow and re-check all your settings.
I hope you're not using the nvidia SW drivers? Use the default IDE drivers, SW are not good in all cases. Again, read the article from Sudhian Media, here's the link:http://www.sudhian.com/showdocs.cfm?aid=307
Bartons run best with memory in sync. Your voltage is way too high, you shouldn't need more than at most 1.725 for 200 x 11
speed_x
Spinner
8 Feb 2004, 11:18am
speed_x, welcome to Short-Media. You have the honour of being our 1000'th member. Congrats and thanks for joining.
Spinner
(please carry on the tech talk now)
Degarmo
8 Feb 2004, 4:25pm
Sounds like the first thing one should do nowdays is cut the L12 bridge to a 166 barton. I did this to my first cpu and lost 384k L2 Cache. I must have cut to deep. While trying to rejoin the bridge I killed the cpu. I now have another 166 barton with same 11 X 200 no boot problem. I'm not cutting the bridge again, because this one will at least run over 200Mhz at a lower multiplier. 228 X 9.5, since NF7-S have lost 10 and 10.5 multis with cpu interface enabled.
speed_x
8 Feb 2004, 5:35pm
Hi, thanks Spinner!
It's great to be here and even better to be the 1000th member!
ngfrazier, how is it going with the Barton 2500?
I've found that if you let your hardware "wear in" and get used to each other that it will give you better overclocking. I've overclocked a Barton 3 Ghz with default 166 fsb, a 2500 AQXEA Barton and a TB "B" core DLT3C JIUHB. When I review my settings I've been able to get more performance. This holds for all 3 motherboards I have: 8RDA+, NF7 and A7N8X Del (As an aside, the 8RDA+ and the NF7 do much better than the A7N8X). Sometimes, I'm hostage to my creative urges and I overlook things that should be obvious.
My need for overclocking is for video encoding; I didn't want to wait any longer..I wanted 2 pass DivX encoding in real time or better. I took the Barton 3 Ghz (13 X 166) with an SLK-900U h/s and the NF7 and replaced the NB h/s, lapped the CPU h/s, put a passive h/s on the SB, cut a 120mm blowhole on the top of the case, (2 )90mm holes on front and rear and a passive air intake hole on the case in front of the CPU, leading to the Vantec 92mm (more on this beast!) through a double Mylar insulated channel always feeding the CPU cool exterior air, not re-cirulated hot air. I also cut the 3rd L12 bridge on the CPU to drop the default fsb to 133 Mhz !!!
It took me most of last summer to play around with many fans, heatsinks, etc. and it was ready to fly! All my work was rewarded with 2 pass real time DivX encoding! Final settings 194.19 X 13 =2524 Mhz @1.875 Vcore using the NF7!
About the Vantec Tornado 105cfm fan: it's very, very loud! The minute I started the computer (and heard it!) I ran out the door to get a voltage regulator for it. I mean the thing sounds like 10,000 screaming Banshees! Funny, some of the OCing sites never mentioned this painful fact!
So there, that's the complete story of how I got into OC'ing! The good results come from knowing that it's an ongoing process more so than a final destination.
Yours,
speed_x
speed_x
8 Feb 2004, 6:08pm
Sounds like the first thing one should do nowdays is cut the L12 bridge to a 166 barton. I did this to my first cpu and lost 384k L2 Cache. I must have cut to deep. While trying to rejoin the bridge I killed the cpu. I now have another 166 barton with same 11 X 200 no boot problem. I'm not cutting the bridge again, because this one will at least run over 200Mhz at a lower multiplier. 228 X 9.5, since NF7-S have lost 10 and 10.5 multis with cpu interface enabled.
Many CPU's will hit 200+ fsb with no problems however, mine didn't 'till I cut the 3rd L12 bridge. It took me 2 days of thinking and fretting...did I want to roll the dice? So far, I've done it to 3 Bartons and had good results. All it takes is 1 or 2 very gentle passes with a sharp blade.
Another method I've read about is to touch both ends of the bridge with the leads from a 12 volt battery. According to the person that posted this method (I contacted him) the overvoltage just burns the bridge and doesn't do harm to the rest of the CPU.
The best thing to do is to research, have all the proper tools and take your time. Wait 'till you feel more confident about what you're doing!
ivorycruncher
11 Feb 2004, 4:17am
Hi. I've been browsing through this thread, trying to figure out how to tweak my own system. I've got an Athlon 2500+ (locked multiplier) in a Biostar M7NCD Pro mobo with an nForce2 (SPP/MCP) chipset and 2x256MB sticks of Kingston CAS2.5 DDR400 in a dual-channel DDR config. I'm using the retail heatsink that comes with the 2500 (crappy one, I know) but it's been hanging around 46-47 C under normal load. I've been running at default BIOS settings for about 2-3 weeks now, and I decided to try overclocking after hearing about everybody under the sun pumping the 2500 up to 2300 speed.
I pumped up the FSB speed incrementally, starting with bumping 166 to 170, and then 5MHz increments from there. I managed to get up to 190FSB without stability problems (I increased the Vcore to 1.7-1.725 along the way for good measure). When I tried to go to 195, Windows failed to even show me the XP boot logo. I tried both 193 and then 192 at various Vcore voltages. The closest I came to being stable is 192 at 1.75-1.775 Vcore (haven't tried 1.8 yet). Windows loaded and ran a SiSoft Sandra CPU burn-in test successfully, and then it blue-screened when I attempted to load another program.
I'm trying to figure out what's holding it back. Is it the heatsink (still holding around 46-47C idle)? Is it the Vcore? Is it the memory timings (currently 2.5 2 2 7)? Or is it something a little more obscure like the PCI bus speed mentioned earlier? I'm afraid to try too much more because if I kill this CPU, I'll be back to my old 1700 because I can't afford another 2500 right now. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Jimborae
11 Feb 2004, 5:02am
What is the divider set too? I'm not familiar with that board so I don't know whether it has an auto setting or whether you have to change it manually but it sounds like you may need to change it. But because your multiplier is locked you may have just reached the limit of your cpu speed. If you could unlock it then you could lower the multiplier a notch or two and carry on raising the fsb but that doesn't appear to be an option.
Also its highly unlikely you'll kill your cpu through playing with bios settings,the worst that will happen is that it wont boot & you have to reset the cmos.
speed_x
11 Feb 2004, 11:55am
Hi. I've been browsing through this thread, trying to figure out how to tweak my own system. I've got an Athlon 2500+ (locked multiplier) in a Biostar M7NCD Pro mobo with an nForce2 (SPP/MCP) chipset and 2x256MB sticks of Kingston CAS2.5 DDR400 in a dual-channel DDR config. I'm using the retail heatsink that comes with the 2500 (crappy one, I know) but it's been hanging around 46-47 C under normal load. I've been running at default BIOS settings for about 2-3 weeks now, and I decided to try overclocking after hearing about everybody under the sun pumping the 2500 up to 2300 speed.
I pumped up the FSB speed incrementally, starting with bumping 166 to 170, and then 5MHz increments from there. I managed to get up to 190FSB without stability problems (I increased the Vcore to 1.7-1.725 along the way for good measure). When I tried to go to 195, Windows failed to even show me the XP boot logo. I tried both 193 and then 192 at various Vcore voltages. The closest I came to being stable is 192 at 1.75-1.775 Vcore (haven't tried 1.8 yet). Windows loaded and ran a SiSoft Sandra CPU burn-in test successfully, and then it blue-screened when I attempted to load another program.
I'm trying to figure out what's holding it back. Is it the heatsink (still holding around 46-47C idle)? Is it the Vcore? Is it the memory timings (currently 2.5 2 2 7)? Or is it something a little more obscure like the PCI bus speed mentioned earlier? I'm afraid to try too much more because if I kill this CPU, I'll be back to my old 1700 because I can't afford another 2500 right now. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
I had the same problem with a couple of my Barton 2.5's and I cut the 3rd L12 bridge and was able to go above 200 FSB. Many folks report not being able to go above 190-195 FSB on Bartons. Look for the Sudhian Media link on some of my previous postings, it's got a good article on cutting the L12 bridge. Some Bartons refuse to run above 190-195 Mhz, period! I have a 3000 that has never ran dependably over 195 WITH the L12 cut! The luck of the draw has a lot to do with it. Not all Bartons are the same.
BTW, the best utility I've found for testing is Prime95. If your computer will run it overnight, it will just about run any other benchmark. I don't think too much of the Sandra burn in utility. Your memory setting seems OK; I think if you stay under 1.9 Vcore you'll be OK. I've read 1.9+ Vcore is considered burned CPU danger zone.
If after doing all that you can the CPU fails to run beyond 192 or so, then use the best memory timing for that FSB, knowing that's all you can get!
If later on you'd like to get a good OCing CPU, look to buy a good stepping like AQXEA or AQZEA.
speed_x
ivorycruncher
12 Feb 2004, 6:06am
Well, this is the first time I've ever attempted overclocking. Some of these things like memory timings and AQXEA and whatever mean nothing to me. If you could fill me in a little, or point me to some good "overclocking basics" FAQs, that's be great.
In response to Jimborae, do you have any idea where that setting might be in an Award BIOS? I don't recall seeing anything like that in the Advanced Chipset Features where I was playing with the FSB and memory timings. If I can find such a setting to change, what do I change it to?
speed_x
13 Feb 2004, 4:53am
Well, this is the first time I've ever attempted overclocking. Some of these things like memory timings and AQXEA and whatever mean nothing to me. If you could fill me in a little, or point me to some good "overclocking basics" FAQs, that's be great.
In response to Jimborae, do you have any idea where that setting might be in an Award BIOS? I don't recall seeing anything like that in the Advanced Chipset Features where I was playing with the FSB and memory timings. If I can find such a setting to change, what do I change it to?
Hi Ivorycruncher and all!
In answer to your question: Many processors are able to run at a much higher setting than stock. The stepping (production code) they come with, such as AQXEA, AQZEA,etc. makes some units better overclockers. If you start with a good stepping you might achieve a high overclock. It's best to buy a processor with a particular stepping than roll the dice and get whatever. Many of the good steppings are selling on ebay at near 100% over retail.
There are many OCing sites that will run down the basics for you. The barton 2500 with a good nforce2 board is very easy to overclock. Many times it's just setting the FSB to 200 and bumping the voltage to about 1.7 volts and it will run dependable as a 3.2 Ghz.
Not all processors are created the same. Some will do very well and some don't. It's best to get the good stepping to start with!
Could we have more info on your rig?
Stepping/power supply/bios settings/memory/cooler
You need a good power supply to overclock. Most units that come bundled with the case are not good. You should have at least a 400 Watt unit with good solid readings on the 3.3 and 5 volt rails.
PS: your temp. does seem rather high...have you lapped the heatsink?
speed_x
ivorycruncher
13 Feb 2004, 5:15am
Okay, here's what it says in the CPU-Z program. It's an AMD Athlon XP (obviously), Family 6, Model A, Stepping 0, Ext. Family 7, Ext. Model A. I bought it from Newegg.com as a retail model, which included a heatsink. I just got another one from there for another computer I'm building for somebody (an OEM 2500). The codes on that one are AXDA2500KV4D, 41F6486L30064, and AQXEA 0238MPM. If I recall right, mine says pretty much the same thing (AQXEA).
I have a 300W power supply (most likely a cheap one, since this machine started out as a $145 computer from ebay and I'm still using the original case and power supply).
My memory, as I said before, is 2 x 256MB sticks of Kingston PC3200 CAS2.5. The CPU heatsink is the retail one with the CPU. I must admit that I was kind of ticked when I found out it had a thermal pad instead of thermal grease (I'm guessing the grease cools better). My old 1700+ had a Thermaltake Volcano 6u with a copper insert, and it ran around 36-39 C with normal load, so I know there are much better heatsinks out there. It's just a matter of getting the money to buy a decent one.
As far as the BIOS settings, I listed some of them before. Could you be more specific on which BIOS settings you're interested in? Oh, and what the heck do you mean by "lapping" the heatsink?
P.S. I attached an html summary from CPU-Z in a zip file for your viewing pleasure.
speed_x
14 Feb 2004, 4:39am
Okay, here's what it says in the CPU-Z program. It's an AMD Athlon XP (obviously), Family 6, Model A, Stepping 0, Ext. Family 7, Ext. Model A. I bought it from Newegg.com as a retail model, which included a heatsink. I just got another one from there for another computer I'm building for somebody (an OEM 2500). The codes on that one are AXDA2500KV4D, 41F6486L30064, and AQXEA 0238MPM. If I recall right, mine says pretty much the same thing (AQXEA).
I have a 300W power supply (most likely a cheap one, since this machine started out as a $145 computer from ebay and I'm still using the original case and power supply).
My memory, as I said before, is 2 x 256MB sticks of Kingston PC3200 CAS2.5. The CPU heatsink is the retail one with the CPU. I must admit that I was kind of ticked when I found out it had a thermal pad instead of thermal grease (I'm guessing the grease cools better). My old 1700+ had a Thermaltake Volcano 6u with a copper insert, and it ran around 36-39 C with normal load, so I know there are much better heatsinks out there. It's just a matter of getting the money to buy a decent one.
As far as the BIOS settings, I listed some of them before. Could you be more specific on which BIOS settings you're interested in? Oh, and what the heck do you mean by "lapping" the heatsink?
P.S. I attached an html summary from CPU-Z in a zip file for your viewing pleasure.
Hi Ivorycruncher!
Looks to me like you have a good stepping for OCing however, could you give us some info. on your power supply? Like the amperage of each rail?
Lapping the heatsink is taking ever finer wet/dry sandpaper and polishing the bottom of the heatsink. Start with 600 and work your way to 2000 grit, it will drop the temps. about 5 C.
To give you my general feeling: I think you have a good stepping for OCing but your power supply is a crucial. You need at least 400 watts, and a good quality unit...no cheapos! As a guide, 3.3v @ 28+ Amps../5 Volts @ 40+ Amps../12 Volts @ 16+ Amps.. Don't scrimp on this item! Get the best you can get, plan on spending at least $70.00
You should also invest in a good, quality heatsink..do research and find something you can live with. Noise is a big factor.
Here is my setup for my Barton 2500@ 2327 Mghz:
Fortron Source 400watt power supply, link: http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProductDesc.asp?description=17-104-974&catalog=58&manufactory=BROWSE&depa=0
Cooler: GlacialTech 2510 Pro, Link: http://www.glacialtech.com/pdf/Igloo%202510pro.pdf (I don't know who sells these anymore!) Read the specs and find something close to it. To give you an idea of what it will do, I'm running an Athlon 1800 Tb at 200 X 11.5 (2300 Mghz) at 26C idle/ 46c prime95
The bios setting is the memory divider..what is it? Are you Sync? Meaning 1/1 with the FSB?
speed_x
ivorycruncher
27 Feb 2004, 4:03am
Hi again. I sincerely apologize for taking so long to reply, but an annoying little thing called real life has been consuming all my time recently, and will continue to do so in the near future (last semester of my 2-year college program).
First off, I'm finding out I'm in over my head, because I don't have any idea what you mean by the amperage of each rail. I do know that I probably have an el cheapo power supply, because I've been noticing my Vcore voltage in CPU-Z fluctuating. That's probably why my system is unstable at higher FSB speeds. As for getting a better one, I'd love to buy a good quality case and power supply, but I can't really invest in that right now because I'm trying to save money to live on after college until I can find a job (in computer tech support, no less).
And for the heatsink, I don't really have the time to mess with sanding it, and since it's designed with a thermal pad instead of grease, that probably wouldn't work anyway. I've currently got my eye on the Vantec Aeroflow for Socket A CPUs on Newegg.com. I installed that in the computer I recently built for my sister (an OEM Athlon 2500+ running at stock speeds) and it's keeping that thing at a cool 33-35 C at normal load. But I'll probably have to wait a bit longer to get it, because I need money to live on at the moment.
I appreciate all the help you've given me, and I think I have a much better handle on the basics of overclocking now. But, I think I'm gonna have to back off the overclocking thing for a bit until I have the time and resources to do it right. Thanks again! :wave:
vBulletin® v3.8.1, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.