Can I put XP Pro on a 200 Mhz P1 computer?

To talk on Icrontic, just register!

It only takes 30 seconds.

Have an account? Sign in:

Reply to Discussion

Options

Tim K

Icrontic Regular

27 Posts

5 Jul 2003, 7:12am

Can I put XP Pro on a 200 Mhz P1 computer?

I know the official word from Microsoft is for 300 Mhz and higher processors only, but I have someone who wants me to install XP Pro on his computer. It's an old Dell Optiplex from 1994. It has a 200 Mhz Pentium 1 processor, and 128 MB of the old style "small" RAM chips in 4 rows. And a 4 GB hard drive.

He won't do much with it besides some low level musical work and miscellaneous web searches.

Will it work, Or should I just install 98 SE? It has 98 on it now and everything drags pretty badly. Slow operation in general.

I once put XP Pro on a 350 Mhz Gateway G6-350 with only 96 MB RAM installed and it worked good. It was later bumped up to 192 MB RAM (PC100).

__________________ See "Online Video", the newest webshow on the internet, only at loudmouthtim.com !

Reply with Quote

danball1976

Veteran Icrontian

2,634 Posts

5 Jul 2003, 7:19am

No, more than likey not.

It requires a PII 333MHz, and 256MB of RAM, especially since those old sticks are probably the old 72 pin sticks

__________________

Visit my Deviant Art profile - Visit my Fur Affinity profile

Reply with Quote

primesuspect

The Icrontic Guy

27,793 Posts

5 Jul 2003, 7:33am

I'll tell you this:

IT WILL WORK

I can assure you of that

HOWEVER, it will be so unbelievably slow, that it will be completely unusable. I cannot stress this enough: IT WILL BE IMPOSSIBLE TO USE IT. We're talking boot times of 3-4 minutes, 2 minutes to open a program, etc. And with only 128mb of SIMM memory, that thing will be paging to the HD every second that it's turned on. And with a system bus that slow, and a processor that slow, the paging operations will take hours. It will be unusable.

__________________ "I offer my genius to the world, all I ask is you pick up my expenses"

Reply with Quote

a2jfreak

madasiemanym

3,351 Posts

5 Jul 2003, 8:58am

So you're telling him there's a chance?

(Just so no one gets dumbfounded, that's a slightly modified quote from Dumb & Dumber. Jim Carey is asking the girl of his dreams what the odds are of a guy like her and a gal like him going out. She says "Not good." He says, "What? Like 1 in a hundred?" She says, "More like 1 in a million" to which he replies, "So . . . you're telling me there's a chance!" Sorry if these quotes aren't exact, but they should be accurate enough to not skew things too far.)

primesuspect said
I'll tell you this:

IT WILL WORK

I can assure you of that

HOWEVER, it will be so unbelievably slow, that it will be completely unusable. I cannot stress this enough: IT WILL BE IMPOSSIBLE TO USE IT. We're talking boot times of 3-4 minutes, 2 minutes to open a program, etc. And with only 128mb of SIMM memory, that thing will be paging to the HD every second that it's turned on. And with a system bus that slow, and a processor that slow, the paging operations will take hours. It will be unusable.

Reply with Quote

Spinner

Getting it done!

5,003 Posts

5 Jul 2003, 9:11am

I have always understood the minimum CPU requirement was a 233Mhz Pentium. I can't say first hand that it won't work, but if Windows XP is anything like Windows ME was (with regard to system requirements), if it detects an inadequate CPU it will not allow you to install. However I can not confirm this as I have never actually tried to install XP on a machine with specs that low.

Which brings me to my next point. Like Prime' said, even if you could get it to install, it would be completely un-usable. Even if you upgraded the memory on that machine, it will still run so slow, you would have to wait half an hour just for the calculator to load up.

I personally wouldn't install XP on a system with less than a 500mhz chip. I installed it on a K6-2 550 (I know they aren't exactly great chips but nevertheless) a while back and even then it was only borderline usable, and that machine had 256MB of RAM. Windows 98 is really your only option.

Personally though I don't think it will even install, but that's just me. But that point is pretty much moot considering the fact that even if you get it installed, and your friend is willing to wait half an hour for apps to load, he probably won't have enough hard drive space left on that 4gig to run anything else anyway.

http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;314865

__________________

Reply with Quote

Spinner edited : 5 Jul 2003 at 9:14am .

mmonnin

Veteran Icrontian

10,545 Posts

5 Jul 2003, 9:14am

I had it on a P2 333 and it worked fine. It was slow. I never did anything with it besides fold but I could surf to download the software client and was able to set it all up ok. It did have 192mb of RAM. 2k is a lil bit better on it. Boot time is only slow cause of the boot order.

__________________ Stanford Team Stats_____________Team Short-Media
Statsman Team Stats______________EOC Team Stats

Reply with Quote

profdlp

Off To The Gym

21,407 Posts

5 Jul 2003, 9:47am

Well...

One thing to keep in mind is that Microsoft doesn't make money by discouraging people from buying their products. When I see their minimum system requirements I usually add about 20% - their idea of minimum is the least you can get by with to run just Windows, and just barely that.

If he is really your friend you should tell him to spend his money on a new computer!

Prof

__________________ ---Prof

**********************************
If it doesn't come naturally, leave it
- Al Stewart
**********************************
RIP Short-Media

Reply with Quote

Tim K

Icrontic Regular

27 Posts

5 Jul 2003, 5:44pm

Yes, he should have a newer computer, and it's not like finding even only a 400-500 Mhz machine would be hard or expensive, but this guy is Cheap with a capital C. This computer was given to him.

He's "not even sure it's worth it" to get his own dial up account for $10-$20 a month!

I'll install 98 and then the SE upgrade and see how that goes.

Just out of curiosity, does anyone know the minimum specs for 98 SE? I'd imagine they're pretty low, like 66 Mhz CPU's and 32 MB of memory or something.

I've heard in the past that 98 / 98SE is a good OS for not using a lot of system resources. Unlike XP. But I like XP.

Reply with Quote

Spinner

Getting it done!

5,003 Posts

5 Jul 2003, 5:56pm

Yeah I think it's 66mhz, 98 is pretty good on system resources, at least when compared to the memory sucking XP.

Reply with Quote

Tobin

Icrontic Convert

19 Posts

5 Jul 2003, 8:00pm

I really wouldn't do it. The slowest I've ever run XP was at 350 MHz, 128 RAM and that was slooooooowwwww. You wouldn't be able to do anything on it anyway. Spend a few hundred dollars on a cheap PC.

Reply with Quote

SimGuy

Your World. Delivered.

2,049 Posts

5 Jul 2003, 9:15pm

Windows 98 Minimum requirements are:

486/66
16 MB RAM
195 MB HDD Space
2x CD-ROM
VGA ir higher resolution monitor

Yes, Windows XP will run on a P200 MMX, however if you plan on using that system at all, you had better pack it FULL of RAM. 96 MB or higher will get the job done.

I've had XP installed on a P233 MMX with 96 MB of RAM and was able to use the system for basic tasks, like word processing, spreadsheets, internet & e-mail.

__________________

Intel Core 2 Duo E6700 @ 3200 MHz :: Asus P5Q Deluxe :: 8 GB OCZ Reaper HPC DDR2-1066 (5-5-5-15) :: BFG GeForce 8800 GTX OC
CM-830 Black :: 150 GB WD Raptor :: 1 TB Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 :: 24" Westinghouse L2410NM :: OCZ GameXStream 700W

Reply with Quote

CaffeineMe

TiVo Zealot

327 Posts

5 Jul 2003, 10:53pm

Don't

I used to run Win95 on a 486/66, 8MB RAM. Dog ass slow (but I could play Diablo on it!). I've also run W2K Server on a P233 w. 256 MB RAM. It was useable as a file/printserver, nothing more. XP is so graphical that the system you are discussing would be as good as unuseable. It's time for your friend to realize, you can't always get what you wa-ant, you can't always get what you wa-ant. But, you can try sometime, and you just might find, you get whatch you nee-ed....OHHH YEAH, baby!!!!!

I went down, to the jersey drugstore.....

__________________ It is said that idle hands are the Devil's tools: Idle geek hands, however, came up with gunpowder, nuclear weapons, and toilet plungers. -Illiad

Reply with Quote

a2jfreak

madasiemanym

3,351 Posts

6 Jul 2003, 6:22am

You must have the patience of Job.

SimGuy said
I've had XP installed on a P233 MMX with 96 MB of RAM and was able to use the system for basic tasks, like word processing, spreadsheets, internet & e-mail.

Reply with Quote

Geeky1

No comment.

7,972 Posts

6 Jul 2003, 7:28am

WinXP runs with approximately the same speed as a glacier on a 600MHz mobile Pentium 3 with 256MB of ram... and I'm speaking from personal experience. And that was with the fluff off too... I'd only install it on anything below 500MHz for laughs...

__________________ -MCCCXXXVII
"Ignorance is forgivable. Stupidity is inexcusable."

Resident Dual CPU Addict: 3 working duallies, 2 more in the parts drawer, and looking to add an Opteron dually to that list as soon as I can find a good motherboard...

Reply with Quote

WuGgaRoO

Rat Catcher

2,351 Posts

6 Jul 2003, 3:04pm

ive had windows xp on my 450 dell...it didnt run that bad at all..but then again i ONLY used it for folding

__________________

sig compliments of Dogsoldier due to most people's retinas burning
Now with No Smoke Technology!
[url="http://club.ign.com/b/list/custom?&lid=100018&owner=WuGgaRoO&mode=vown[/URL]

Reply with Quote

Gargoyle

We can't stop here...

4,685 Posts

» Subscriber

6 Jul 2003, 4:50pm

Windows XP makes for a stable folding box, Buddy J had it on a Celeron 400 w/ 96mb ram. But, all it did was fold. Using it on a daily basis would probably be frustrating.

__________________ Main Rig: ASRock 939Dual-SATA2, Opteron 165 @ 9x275=2475, 7600 GT
Laptop: Dell 1520, C2D @ 2000, 8600M GT
Icrontic_11: Asus A7N8X-Deluxe, Barton @ 13x170=2210

Reply with Quote

Tim K

Icrontic Regular

27 Posts

12 Jul 2003, 4:35pm

What is a folding box and what does it do?

Reply with Quote

Spinner

Getting it done!

5,003 Posts

12 Jul 2003, 5:18pm

Tim K said
What is a folding box and what does it do?

A folding box refers to having a PC solely dedicated to running the folding@home program.

http://short-media.com/forum/showthr...?s=&threadid=3

Reply with Quote

sas427bb

New to the neighborhood

1 Posts

18 Jan 2004, 3:36pm

Why not put NT on it Not XP i got me and pc in new york for free it is a 1996 packed bell i took it home it had a 150 meg P and 49 meds of EDO ram 1.5 hardrive i upgrade it to a 5 gig hardrive 64 megs in ram i had windows 98 on it i took it off and put windows NT 4.0 ser pack 6 useing 350 megs of the hardive in the NTFS i made it into a web server works good and fast for what it is i have a chat and a post a bord server all on it. so he wants XP on a 200 p trun off system restore remove all the windows programs use the NTFS! No windows update maybe you can go some faster than and snail ok this is what a 150 p can do http://stans.servequake.com

Reply with Quote

Enverex

~-+-~

5,852 Posts

18 Jan 2004, 3:43pm

Quoting primesuspect

I'll tell you this:

IT WILL WORK

Thats not actually true.
I have an old K6-2 machine that I can't install XP on because it says the motherboard is incompatible with XP, and refuses to install.

So it's actually "It MAY work"

__________________ RetroTracks - Classic Computer and Game Music

Reply with Quote

		Icrontic Forums > Tech: Software > Operating Systems
Can I put XP Pro on a 200 Mhz P1 computer?

Jump to

This Thread	Search this Thread
Print Email	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

Username
Password	Forgot?
Remember me