To talk on Icrontic, just register!

It only takes 30 seconds.

Have an account? Sign in:

Forgot?
MarkTAW
Icrontic Duke of Haxor
MarkTAW
168 Posts

The New WinFS

The WinFS File System For Windows Longhorn: Faster & Smarter

http://www6.tomshardware.com/storage...617/index.html

And related Slashdottedness:

http://developers.slashdot.org/artic...id=185&tid=190

"Tom's Hardware Guide has an article about the new WinFS file system. The article talks first about some of the problems and advantages with FAT[16|32] and NTFS, then talks briefly about WinFS. Here is the summary: 'Microsoft is breaking new ground with Longhorn, successor to XP. The upcoming WinFS file system will be the first to be context-dependent, and promises to make long search times and wasted memory a thing of the past. Today, THG compares it to FAT and NTFS.' Personally, I still have reservations about using a relational database to keep track of files. Unless they can keep the overhead to a minimum, I can't see it being as efficient as a file system should be."

I never could get straight the advantages of FAT32 v. NTFS - which is faster when you really need speed, the one that writes the FS entry first, or the one that writes the entry after it writes the file? Now I have to worry about WinFS. Ugh.
__________________ www.marktaw.com
dodo
Genious
dodo
319 Posts
very interesting, this seems like the main selling point for Longhorn as of now.

~dodo
maxanon
Icrontic Posting Maniac
maxanon
381 Posts
I imagine a lot of ram will be needed. It should be faster than the system they have now. It definitely will (should) hvae high minimum specs.

From the problems I see with databases right now, I shudder to think of the myriad of ways of messing it up.

I'll wait for SR2 before venturing down that path.
RWB
Thank God for Blue Monsters
RWB
7,356 Posts
I wander if you will need to ever defrag, I don't care about the SMALL unnoticable speed difference, I just hate defrags.
__________________
danball1976
Veteran Icrontian
danball1976
2,634 Posts
RWB said
I wander if you will need to ever defrag, I don't care about the SMALL unnoticable speed difference, I just hate defrags.
True, but defragging is necessary though. My brother doesn't see the point in why you would want to do that. He doesn't even run scandisk either.
__________________
Visit my Deviant Art profile - Visit my Fur Affinity profile
RWB
Thank God for Blue Monsters
RWB
7,356 Posts
It's my understanding that linux does not require defragging, I defrag OFTEN, I scan often. Actually it does it all for me when I am sleeping.
Go Back   Icrontic Forums > Tech: Software > Operating Systems
Jump to
This Thread Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Current time: 2:14pm (GMT)
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Get Vanilla instead. Trust me.