Howdy, stranger! Ready to join the community? [log in]

8 core Nehalem Xeon tips up

The International Solid State Circuits Conference running February 8-12 in San Francisco will host a cadre of venerable tech firms, including Intel, which plans to discuss an octo-core Nehalem-based Xeon.

Evidence for the beastly CPU is revealed in item 3.1 on page 22 of the full conference itinerary (PDF):

8core_xeon

Significant evidence adds veracity to the idea that this is indeed a Nehalem:

  • An octo-core Penryn-based part would have an unworkable TDP. The Xeon X7460, a hexa-core chip based on Penryn architecture already claims a 130W TDP at just 2.66GHz. A higher envelope could easily be considered unsuitable given contemporary conventions for datacenter greenliness.
  • A 6.4GT/s I/O lane smacks of the 6.4GT/s QuickPath Interconnect bus featured on today’s Nehalem processors. Given that QPI taps out around 7GT/s without the aid of phase changing, it’s unlikely that Intel has delivered a faster grade. That aside, the Penryn just doesn’t offer this kind of bus bandwidth.
  • The transistor count is about right for an octo-core Nehalem. Today’s Bloomfield-based desktop Nehalem CPUs feature 731 million transistors with just 8MB lf L3 cache. Tripling the L3 cache to 24MB and doubling the core count spits out a 2,669,959,552 transistor chip. Tack on some architecture optimizations and some cache sharing, and you’re at a shiny 2.3 billion.

You can expect to see this chip known as the Beckton in the coming months. Chips based on this core will fit in a 90W, 105W or 130W TDP, use four QPI links (Bloomfield uses two), and rock FB-DIMM.

When all is said and done: we want.

Share |

4 Comments:

  1. Buddy J
    Dept. of Propaganda

    Dear programmers,
    Please make neat software and games that make use of multiple cores. This single and dual core business has gone on long enough.
    Love,
    Buddy J

  2. Snarkasm
    The Photographer.
    Dear programmers,
    Please make neat software and games that make use of multiple cores. This single and dual core business has gone on long enough.
    Love,
    Buddy J

    thisXinfinity

  3. MiracleManS
    Mediocrity Gets You Pears

    Unfortunately its not THAT easy to do multi-core development if you haven't been instructed on how to do it.

    I remember the first time I even learned to use threads was an obstacle in and of itself. I imagine they're only going to get better, but I, personally, can't imagine having to deal with management of multiple threads across multiple cores.

  4. pragtastic
    IC Regular

    Language is a big hindrance to multi-threaded / parallel programming IMO. Few of the mainstream languages make it a reasonable task, especially for small shops / solo programmers.

Hey, be nice. Icrontic is full of good people, we promise.

New Features on Icrontic: