Howdy, stranger! Ready to join the community? [log in]

FCC uses tax dollars to tell us what we already know about broadband

fcc_logoTwo days ago the FCC released the preliminary findings from its broadband task force. President Obama has directed the FCC to submit a national broadband plan to Congress by February 17, 2010 as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. The task at hand? Come up with the most efficient way to spend stimulus dollars to bolster the nation’s broadband infrastructure.

The report states a need to add broadband deployment, adoption, affordability, and technology to national priorities like health care, education and finance. The endgame, says the FCC, is to adopt and provide a policy of universal broadband.

This phase of the plan covers specific findings from the commission’s previous studies. Amongst the FCC’s findings:

  • Millions still cannot get even the most basic definition of broadband, or a line with 768Kbps downstream.
  • Most of the current bandwidth is used by a smaller percentage of users.
  • Your ISP is not providing you with the advertised speed the majority of the time.

The report notes that actual speeds lag behind advertisements by as much as 80%. It also indicates that about 20% of the users drive 80% of the total traffic.

This just in: Broadband providers over-promise on the speeds they deliver, and the kid that downloads hundreds of movies and songs a week takes more than their fair share of the available bandwidth. Who knew?

In all seriousness, the FCC is off to a good start. By February 17, the FCC should have a detailed analysis of how much stimulus money will be needed to get the United States in a leadership position for worldwide broadband.

Preliminary findings indicate that a $350 billion investment could equip all Americans with affordable 100Mbps lines. Bandwidth like that has many benefits, including improved wireless services, better energy grids, improved education and so on.

This is something America needs to do to keep pace in an extraordinarily competitive global economy. We will be eagerly awaiting the FCC’s recommendations in 2010.

Share |

6 Comments:

  1. drasnor
    124 Golden Eye Drive
    This just in: Broadband providers over-promise on the speeds they deliver, and the kid that downloads hundreds of movies and songs a week takes more than their fair share of the available bandwidth. Who knew?

    What do you mean "more than their fair share?" They're paying for and getting the same service you are. Don't blame the customer when the service provider lies about their product.

    -drasnor

  2. MachineDog
    Icrontic Technician

    I was about to comment something akin to drasnor's. I'd only like to see large investment into high-speed broadband if we're allowed to call it infrastructure instead of a commodity. Commodities usually have actual competition.

  3. Thrax
    Cad

    That's what net neutrality is angling for... Infrastructure treatment.

  4. Cliff
    Keepin it real

    dransor,

    I would be the last to blame the consumer. Fair share just being a term relative to the average user, thats all.

  5. Nick
    Guest

    But doesn't his administration also want the ability to turn it all off when they want to?

  6. Thrax
    Cad
    But doesn't his administration also want the ability to turn it all off when they want to?

    Not really, no. The idea that the president would be able to turn off the internet in times of national emergency has its origins in a poor interpretation of the vague language used in an early draft of the national cybersecurity bill. The poor interpretation got picked up and parroted throughout the blogosphere to such a degree that it has become a common, but inaccurate, understanding.

    Here's a statement from Jena Longo, deputy communications director for the Senate Commerce Committee:

    To be very clear, the Rockefeller-Snowe bill will not empower a "government shutdown or takeover of the Internet" and any suggestion otherwise is misleading and false. The purpose of this language is to clarify how the president directs the public-private response to a crisis.

Hey, be nice. Icrontic is full of good people, we promise.

New Features on Icrontic: