Howdy, stranger! Ready to join the community? [log in]

First review of “Gulftown” Intel Core i9 appears

intelWe’ve been discussing Intel’s upcoming Gulftown for quite a while now. Tapped to succeed the Bloomfield (Core i7) at the top of Intel’s performance heap, the new Core i9-branded part will launch with a raft of enhancements to make sure it fills those shoes.

Gulftown’s membership in the 32nm Westmere family of architectures has allowed Intel to drop temps, boost cache, raise clockspeeds and increase the cores– six, to be exact. With a dash of HyperThreading and X58 compatibility, enthusiast desktops will be primed to chew through twelve concurrent threads when the chip debuts in early 2010.

While the details surrounding the chip have been available for quite some time, hard performance has remained elusive until today. HKEPC has recently published a small review that pits the Core i9 against a battery of tests, all of which paint it as an improvement to the Bloomfield.

To whet your appetite, here’s a snippet we’ve polished after Google spit it out:

In power consumption and temperature testing, the 32nm manufacturing process used by the Intel Gulftown offered amazing performance. Although Gulftown has six cores to the Bloomfield Core i7’s four, power consumption and temperatures are lower than the quad core. This proves that the next-generation 32nm manufacturing process is very mature.

Share |

4 Comments:

  1. Cliff_Forster
    Keepin it real

    Even the resident AMD fanboy will admit that this is clearly an impressive piece of processor fab.

    What I have to wonder is this? I don't have the most recent data but last quarter estimates had it that the i7 had not even penetrated 1% of the current desktop processor market. Of the i7's being sold, a vast majority are the 920. Now, the only reason you can surmise for a fantastic piece of tech like this that generates a massive amount of buzz, but does not translate into sales success is price. Add global economic turmoil to the mix, and you know the price is out of line with what people are willing to pay for performance today.

    So, what will the i9 accomplish for Intel and its shareholders? It will generate buzz, look great on stat sheets and synthetic benchmarks, but if it does not sell, (and it won't in early 2010 unless they perform a miracle on price), what is the point??

  2. MAGIC
    NFNF

    It will sell because everyone wants the biggest e-penis, so they will buy it to have the fastest proc on the market.

  3. Leonardo
    F@H Reign of Terror is back!
    I don't have the most recent data but last quarter estimates had it that the i7 had not even penetrated 1% of the current desktop processor market.

    That stands to reason. The great majority of desktop consumers buy a major brand, ready-made model. The price trend, especially when adjusted for inflation, is ever downward. The low prices are enabled through extreme mass production and use of less expensive, not-so-high performance parts. And look who is purchasing high performance parts - the gamers. But I believe a PC gamer who builds his own is much more likely to upgrade with a powerful video card rather than the latest CPU. No?

  4. Snarkasm
    The Photographer.

    If market complacency stopped companies from making cool new things, we'd all still be using 8-tracks and taking trains. What if they just made it because they could, and wanted to prove it?

Hey, be nice. Icrontic is full of good people, we promise.

New Features on Icrontic: