14,724 is my highest, but I haven't run benchmarks since I got the CPU up to 3825MHz. I'll post the results of that when I get to it. I'm also looking into possible volt-mods for the 8800GT to push it a little higher.
This run was:
Q6600 @ 400x9
8800GT 771/1782/999
4GB PC6400 4-4-4-12
Asus Maximus Formula
Vista x64
EDIT:
Same System Specs, but on XP x64 instead of Vista:
Interesting that the majority of the point gap comes from CPU score...
Specs for this run were 783/1890/1161 with CPU @ 425x9. Had to give the memory a voltage bump to get it to run @ 1161, from 1.91v to 2.06v. Also upped volts to GPU core from 1.05v to 1.1v. Considering hard mod to get it to ~1.25v
Specs for this run were 783/1890/1161 with CPU @ 425x9. Had to give the memory a voltage bump to get it to run @ 1161, from 1.91v to 2.06v. Also upped volts to GPU core from 1.05v to 1.1v. Considering hard mod to get it to ~1.25v
The system:
MSI P6N Diamond (nForce 680i SLI)
Intel Q6600 2.4GHz
2GB (2x1GB) Platinum Rev 2 DDR2-800
eVGA 8800GT KO Edition (Factory OC'ed to 675/1950 MHz Core/RAM)
XFX 8800GT XXX Alpha Dog (Factory OC'ed to 670/1950 MHz Core/RAM)
Monitor: 61" Samsung DLP. Not important to the benchmark, but still cool - especially when playing Bioshock.
I have not overclocked anything in this system yet, but I am working on replacing the stock cooling for just about everything. CPU has a Thermalright Ultra120 Extreme on it, and the GPUs will probably get some HRT-03s after the LAN.
One question - The benchmark doesn't list the second video card. How would I tell whether they're both working in the benchmark?
Comments
Just like a chronometer on the race track, helps measuring how much better the system performs after overclocking and tweaking
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=2302161
<TABLE class=dataTable cellSpacing=3 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=tableLabel vAlign=top width="50%">3DMark Score</TD><TD class=tableValue vAlign=top>5732 3DMarks</TD></TR><TR><TD background=/images/orb/pattern_hline.gif colSpan=2>
Processor: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz
Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GT, 558 MHz / 702 MHz
System Memory :1536 MB
Motherboard : D101GGC
Dont know if thats any good or not. Got down to 0 frames at some points!
Dont know how much the 7600GT is OC'able either.
SM 2.0 Score 4554 Marks
SM 3.0 Score 4815 Marks
CPU Score 3180 Marks
and it seems like that is a good score
i only got an average of 30-40 fps in the graphics test.. seems like I should get more with my setup.
This run was:
Q6600 @ 400x9
8800GT 771/1782/999
4GB PC6400 4-4-4-12
Asus Maximus Formula
Vista x64
EDIT:
Same System Specs, but on XP x64 instead of Vista:
Interesting that the majority of the point gap comes from CPU score...
Specs for this run were 783/1890/1161 with CPU @ 425x9. Had to give the memory a voltage bump to get it to run @ 1161, from 1.91v to 2.06v. Also upped volts to GPU core from 1.05v to 1.1v. Considering hard mod to get it to ~1.25v
:wow:
here is my new one
Hmm, you got a higher Aquamark than me, but a lower 3Dmark
MSI P6N Diamond (nForce 680i SLI)
Intel Q6600 2.4GHz
2GB (2x1GB) Platinum Rev 2 DDR2-800
eVGA 8800GT KO Edition (Factory OC'ed to 675/1950 MHz Core/RAM)
XFX 8800GT XXX Alpha Dog (Factory OC'ed to 670/1950 MHz Core/RAM)
Monitor: 61" Samsung DLP. Not important to the benchmark, but still cool - especially when playing Bioshock.
I have not overclocked anything in this system yet, but I am working on replacing the stock cooling for just about everything. CPU has a Thermalright Ultra120 Extreme on it, and the GPUs will probably get some HRT-03s after the LAN.
One question - The benchmark doesn't list the second video card. How would I tell whether they're both working in the benchmark?
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=7002603