Sign in or Register (it’s quick!)

Forgot?
Geeky1
No comment.
Geeky1
7,972 Posts

Are P4s more stable at high temperatures?

People have stated that P4s are "hyper-stable" at temperatures that would cause an Athlon to crash. I've always known that this isn't true, and a lot of you also know that this isn't the case.

But, I set out to prove it nonetheless. So, I grabbed my 1700+ Palomino, and dropped it in the KX7 system that was sitting on my desk. I hooked up the digidoc5, with a thermistor touching the side of the CPU core so I could get the actual CPU temperature. The only cooling was a 2500+ HSF, with various fans. I put MBM5 and F@H on it, fired them up, unplugged the cpu fan, sat back, and watched the thing heat up.

Would you care to guess how hot the 1700+ got (it NEVER froze due to heat- it DID freeze with -forcesse, but it was doing that at 38*C, too. That's just an issue with some of the Palomino cores).

75*C?
No.

80*C?
Nope.

85*C?
*yawn*

87*C
*zzzzz*

Well, I'm actually not entirely sure what I hit- the DigiDoc 5 won't read past 90*C (trust me, I tried- with a Butane torch and a spare thermistor ), but it was AT LEAST 90*C. And judging by the amount of time it took to come down to a temperature of 90*C or below so the DigiDoc5 could read it, I would guess that it actually hit something close to 100*C. While running F@H. Without crashing.

It spent a grand total of around 20 minutes at or above 70*C over the course of the test, without crashing. Ever. It then spent all night between 68*C and 53*C, with an average of 59*C (according to MBM5- remember that the actual temperature is 5-10*C higher than this).

So much for "the P4s are more stable at high temperatures", eh?

Some pics/screenshots:
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	82c-1700.jpg
Views:	840
Size:	122.0 KB
ID:	8592   Click image for larger version

Name:	90.jpg
Views:	840
Size:	36.0 KB
ID:	8593   Click image for larger version

Name:	chart.gif
Views:	832
Size:	7.6 KB
ID:	8594  
__________________ -MCCCXXXVII
"Ignorance is forgivable. Stupidity is inexcusable."

Resident Dual CPU Addict: 3 working duallies, 2 more in the parts drawer, and looking to add an Opteron dually to that list as soon as I can find a good motherboard...
primesuspect
The Icrontic Guy
primesuspect
29,322 Posts
geeky, you are certifiably nuts....


But so are we

Sweet!
__________________ Subscribe for the FULL Icrontic Experience | Sponsor Icrontic for a day! Troll your friends!
mmonnin
Veteran Icrontian
mmonnin
10,545 Posts
I wonder what a duron or a Tbird could do as well. Those things are beasts. Many can run with chipped cored and all.
__________________ Stanford Team Stats_____________Team Short-Media
Statsman Team Stats______________EOC Team Stats
Geeky1
No comment.
Geeky1
7,972 Posts
Probably about the same. The Palominos are spec'd for a max die temp. of 90*C.
madmat
Gone
madmat
2,963 Posts
Run both without a sink and see what happens...the P4 will shut down and the AMD will detonate.
Sounds like there may be a grain of truth there to me.
Thrax
Cat Whisperer
Thrax
25,154 Posts
"Without a sink" is an invalid circumstance as all modern motherboards are preconfigured with overheat shutdown enabled.
__________________ Robert Hallock
Twitter | LinkedIn

CPU: Intel Core i7 920
MoBo: Asus P6T
RAM: 6GB OCZ DDR3-1600
VID: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
HSF: Thermalright Ultra-120

Geeky1
No comment.
Geeky1
7,972 Posts
^ what Thrax said. The CPU overheating protection was disabled on the KX7 for the test. It will shut down automatically if the cpu exceeds 60-75*C, depending on where you set it, when it's configured normally.
Straight_Man
Playing with Virtual Painter
Straight_Man
3,717 Posts

» Subscriber

My box, if left set to thermal protect, would shut down the P4s at 80-85 C Prescott never gets that hot at the OC I have in place. What I used to say what I said, was based on Barton that went unstable at under 70 C and progressively got worse at folding. Both the P4s and the Barton are (in the Barton's case WERE) running roughly 24\7 for months. And when I mean stable I mean stable over weeks and months at constant high temps. It is good that Palominos are more stable, though.

Normal for the Prescott, though, is 66 C +\- one degree C at the OC I have it set at. I've had it running for weeks now, 24\7, at that rate.

One thing about benching for video, Geeky, you might next try this:

Load a video benchmarker, one instance. Get into the Task Manager, in XP Pro, and set process affinity to CPU0, Priority to High, leave it running but not actively benching. Benmchmark video with it set that way. NOW, open the Task Manager, reset the process to normal, check boht pipes, and see if benches improve. They should not change much, most video benchmarkers are 32 bit code, XP will let them use one pipe of CPU-- not both. IF you have a benchmarker that can be run in a window, you might be able to run two, get close to same rates from BOTH at once, versus running just one. Guess, the combined benchmarks (qty two, benchmarks from each added together as that is what the box is actually handling, TWO instances of bench at once), one per pipe, will be about 1.6-1.8X the single benchmark rate, because you are eating lots of RAM, you are using ONE video card, and the Prescott has a cache common to both pipes and does not have the anticipation strategies in the Itanium2 or even the Zeon hardcoded into it.
Thrax
Cat Whisperer
Thrax
25,154 Posts
Xeon. X-e-o-n.
Geeky1
No comment.
Geeky1
7,972 Posts
Uh? How did we arrive at video benchmarking?
madmat
Gone
madmat
2,963 Posts
I'll put it this way, I've seen P4's survive things that would melt an Athlon...one of the guys I worked with ran one doing a virus scan in a notebook after he'd pulled the sink under the keyboard completely OUT as in gone, see ya and it ran without a hicup for at least 3 hours that I'm sure of and possibly longer until I walked by and noticed what was going on so I grabbed a small sink with no fan on it and set it on the CPU to at least help alieviate the problem and walked away, he came back and I pointed out what he had done and he said "no biggie, they thermal throttle so they won't get that hot" and grabbed the sink I had placed there, screamed and dropped the sink back into place.
The sink was so hot he got a nice second degree burn yet the laptop was merrily churning along as if nothing out of the ordinary was wrong, and this was an older P4 laptop...not a P4M, or centrino just a 1.5 or 1.6 P4.
Straight_Man
Playing with Virtual Painter
Straight_Man
3,717 Posts

» Subscriber

We were talking back and forth about P4s versus AMD. What I wondered, was a couple things, and now that you mentioned it, I would be interested in temps on Prescott with two 3D benchmarkers running at once also.... In my case, not going to buy a hugely expensive video card to bench 2X simultaneously, so my benches would be low due to card capabilities. Figured might kill two birds with one stone, on a Prescott box since AFAIK you have one also.
Straight_Man
Playing with Virtual Painter
Straight_Man
3,717 Posts

» Subscriber

I'll put it this way, I've seen P4's survive things that would melt an Athlon...one of the guys I worked with ran one doing a virus scan in a notebook after he'd pulled the sink under the keyboard completely OUT as in gone, see ya and it ran without a hicup for at least 3 hours that I'm sure of and possibly longer until I walked by and noticed what was going on so I grabbed a small sink with no fan on it and set it on the CPU to at least help alieviate the problem and walked away, he came back and I pointed out what he had done and he said "no biggie, they thermal throttle so they won't get that hot" and grabbed the sink I had placed there, screamed and dropped the sink back into place.
The sink was so hot he got a nice second degree burn yet the laptop was merrily churning along as if nothing out of the ordinary was wrong, and this was an older P4 laptop...not a P4M, or centrino just a 1.5 or 1.6 P4.

Had that happen a few times, then I started using a thermal sensor first or letting box cool for half an hour first, or blowing chip\component cooler fluid on the HS before working on HS, and 5-8 min of that flow also worked. Using a Data-safe vacuum\blowers blower end also works.
Geeky1
No comment.
Geeky1
7,972 Posts
*snicker*

But how fast and how hot was it running? There are no desktop P4s that can handle being run at 90*C at full speed. The clock throttling kicks in before then. It could very well have been maintaining a surface temperature of about 70*C (the max. rated die temp for the older P4s is 65-75*C), which is more than enough to give you a nasty burn. It also wasn't running at full speed.

But, the fact that the P4 can run at 80*C or whatever is irrelevant in this case, because, as I've already proven, the athlon can, too, and it can do it at its rated speed. The P4 has to underclock itself to keep from cooking.
Geeky1
No comment.
Geeky1
7,972 Posts
Oh, and Ageek, spraying some of that chip cooler on a hot cpu heatsink is an extraordinarily stupid thing to do. Rapid changes in temperature like that are Not Good for silicon. You're just ASKING for a cracked CPU core, you realize that, right?

//Edit
Yeah, I have a prescott system. I may give that a try. After I find said prescott, which is MIA, and get a working board for it.
madmat
Gone
madmat
2,963 Posts
I want to know what generated that graph...it's way off whatever it was as it never even breaks 70c...that's one temperature monitoring proggy I'd stay well away from.
Geeky1
No comment.
Geeky1
7,972 Posts
The graph is from mbm5, just dropped into excel. If you look at the note in the screenshot, or the post, you'll note that I mentioned several times that the KX7's readings are low (as measured at the cpu core using a digitaldoc 5 with a flat thermistor with as much of the protective plastic stripped away from the thermistor as possible) by as much as 10*C, more in some cases.

The KX7 has an in-socket diode. It's reading the back of the CPU package, not the actual cpu temperature. That graph was for the overnight run, which averaged 59*C according to mbm5; the actual temperature was closer to 65*C. Look at the photograph of the digidoc 5, and the screenshot above it for the maximum temperature results.
madmat
Gone
madmat
2,963 Posts
yeah, that's what i was going by, still mbm shows 82c in that top screenie yet the graph never broke 70c, that's why i was wondering what made the graph...
Geeky1
No comment.
Geeky1
7,972 Posts
Oh, I see. I misunderstood. The reason for that is because the MBM screenshot is from the "maximum temperature" run; the graph is from the interval log that I had it run overnight.
madmat
Gone
madmat
2,963 Posts
Ah, that makes sense. And for the record I've never said that either was more stable at high temps but I have said that O.C'ed Athlons are more temperature intolerant than an equally O.C.'ed P4 which has been my personal experience...your mileage may vary.
I've seen customer rigs with stock clocked AMD's that were like ovens inside when they ran that never faltered but on the flip side I've seen O.C.'ed AMD's that were very touchy about temps, 2 or 3c the wrong way and they'd refuse to run stably.
Geeky1
No comment.
Geeky1
7,972 Posts
* Geeky1 kicks thread... someone should've stickied this a while back. The cooling form mod is falling down on the job again.
TheGr81
Veteran Short-Median
TheGr81
2,406 Posts
Why was an Athlon ever tested? I'm assuming, based on the title of this thread, that you were testing the stability of a P4 at a higher temperature and comparing to the stability at a lower temp.
__________________ Facebook addict.

[folding_sig1]
Geeky1
No comment.
Geeky1
7,972 Posts
You assumed wrong. First line of the thread dude.
shwaip
elaborate bot
shwaip
6,246 Posts
TheGr81 brings up a valid point though. The title makes me expect some sort of comparison, or at least data on a P4. Perhaps they mean at 105* C...or at 110.
__________________
Anyone who wants dropbox, please use my referral link
Geeky1
No comment.
Geeky1
7,972 Posts
The P4 won't operate at that temp period. It will shut itself off before it gets that high... no mobo intervention required.
shwaip
elaborate bot
shwaip
6,246 Posts
The P4 won't operate at that temp period. It will shut itself off before it gets that high... no mobo intervention required.
Regardless, "Athlon XPs are stable at high temperatures" would be a more fitting title
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"NEW" SYSTEM not stable with old clock speed. leishi85 Overclocking 11 6 Sep 2003 11:55pm

Go Back   Icrontic Forums > Tech: Hardware > Mods & Cooling
Jump to
This Thread Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Current time: 3:43am (GMT)
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Get Vanilla Forums instead. Trust me.