New Core_78 v1.56

csimoncsimon Acadiana Icrontian
edited February 2004 in Folding@Home
Folding@home Gromacs Core
Version 1.56 (February 2, 2004)

If you want to get the new core just use the following 3 steps.

1. Stop the client.
2. Delete the current core (FahCore_78.exe) from the client folder.
3. Restart the client.

I highly recommend this core if you are using version 4.0 or higher F@H client.

Check to make sure the v1.56 core has loaded by opening the FAHlog.txt and look for the final instance in which the client was loaded and you should see this probably towards the end of the file:

--- Opening Log file [February 17 16:52:18]


# Windows Console Edition #####################################################
###############################################################################

Folding@home Client Version 4.00

http://folding.stanford.edu

###############################################################################
###############################################################################

Arguments: -service -local -advmethods

[16:52:18] - Ask before connecting: No
[16:52:18] - User name: csimon (Team 93)
[16:52:18] - User ID = 5AB4C86278454C4A
[16:52:18] - Machine ID: 1
[16:52:18]
[16:52:19] Loaded queue successfully.
[16:52:19] + Benchmarking ...
[16:52:21]
[16:52:21] + Processing work unit
[16:52:21] Core required: FahCore_78.exe
[16:52:21] Core found.
[16:52:21] Working on Unit 00 [February 17 16:52:21]
[16:52:21] + Working ...
[16:52:22]
[16:52:22] *
*
[16:52:22] Folding@home Gromacs Core
[16:52:22] Version 1.56 (February 2, 2004)
[16:52:22]
[16:52:22] Preparing to commence simulation
[16:52:22] - Looking at optimizations...
[16:52:22] - Files status OK
[16:52:22] - Go method
[16:52:23] - Expanded 350350 -> 1760809 (decompressed 502.5 percent)
[16:52:24]
[16:52:24] Project: 520 (Run 386, Clone 138, Gen 1)
[16:52:24]
[16:52:24] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[16:52:24] Entering M.D.
[16:52:46] (Starting from checkpoint)
[16:52:46] Protein: p520_BBA5_pf
[16:52:46]
[16:52:46] Writing local files
[16:52:46] Completed 265000 out of 500000 steps (53)
[16:52:46] Extra SSE boost OK.
Good luck.
csimon

Comments

  • qparadoxqparadox Vancouver, BC
    edited February 2004
    Highly recommended core update, it fixed a LOT of my AMD SSE problems. (Still got one fubar but its probably a PSU / mobo issue).
  • Al_CapownAl_Capown Indiana
    edited February 2004
    Link?

    //edit// nevermind I already have it somehow :confused:
  • muddocktormuddocktor
    edited February 2004
    I've been running the 1.56 core on my rigs since Friday morning with no problems at all and now, no lockups at all! :clap::rockon:
  • LammypieLammypie
    edited February 2004
    Well I've just wiped and reinstalled my pc.

    Just downloaded from stanford. And I have FahCore_65.exe and Folding@Home Client Core Version 2.47 (June 14, 2002)

    Strikes me as being a little old.

    Any Ideas whats going on?




    --- Opening Log file [February 18 04:10:30]


    # Windows Graphical Edition ###################################################
    ###############################################################################

    Folding@home Client Version 4.00

    http://folding.stanford.edu

    ###############################################################################
    ###############################################################################



    [04:11:05] - Ask before connecting: No
    [04:11:05] - Use IE connection settings: Yes
    [04:11:05] - User name: Lammypie (Team 93)
    [04:11:05] - User ID not found locally
    [04:11:05] + Requesting User ID from server
    [04:11:14] - Machine ID: 1
    [04:11:14]
    [04:11:14] Work directory not found. Creating...
    [04:11:14] Could not open work queue, generating new queue...
    [04:11:14] Initialization complete
    [04:11:14] + Benchmarking ...
    [04:11:17] - Preparing to get new work unit...
    [04:11:17] + Attempting to get work packet
    [04:11:17] - Connecting to assignment server
    [04:11:17] - Successful: assigned to (171.64.122.119).
    [04:11:17] + News From Folding@Home: v.4 client available
    [04:11:18] Loaded queue successfully.
    [04:11:19] + Closed connections
    [04:11:19]
    [04:11:19] + Processing work unit
    [04:11:19] Core required: FahCore_65.exe
    [04:11:19] Core not found.
    [04:11:19] - Core is not present or corrupted.
    [04:11:19] - Attempting to download new core...
    [04:11:19] + Downloading new core: FahCore_65.exe
    [04:11:21] + 10240 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:21] + 20480 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:21] + 30720 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:21] + 40960 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:21] + 51200 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:22] + 61440 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:22] + 71680 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:22] + 81920 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:22] + 92160 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:22] + 102400 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:22] + 112640 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:23] + 122880 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:23] + 133120 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:23] + 143360 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:23] + 153600 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:23] + 163840 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:24] + 174080 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:24] + 184320 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:24] + 194560 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:24] + 204800 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:24] + 215040 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:24] + 225280 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:25] + 235520 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:25] + 245760 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:25] + 256000 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:25] + 266240 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:25] + 276480 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:25] + 286720 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:26] + 296960 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:26] + 307200 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:26] + 317440 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:26] + 327680 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:26] + 337920 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:27] + 348160 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:27] + 358400 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:27] + 368640 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:27] + 378880 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:27] + 389120 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:27] + 399360 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:28] + 409600 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:28] + 419840 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:28] + 430080 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:28] + 440320 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:28] + 450560 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:28] + 460800 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:29] + 471040 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:29] + 481280 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:29] + 491520 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:29] + 501760 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:29] + 512000 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:30] + 522240 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:30] + 532480 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:30] + 542720 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:30] + 552960 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:30] + 563200 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:30] + 573440 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:31] + 583680 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:31] + 592641 bytes downloaded
    [04:11:31] Verifying core Core_65.fah...
    [04:11:31] Signature is VALID
    [04:11:31]
    [04:11:31] Trying to unzip core FahCore_65.exe
    [04:11:31] Decompressed FahCore_65.exe (1732608 bytes) successfully
    [04:11:31] + Core successfully engaged
    [04:11:36]
    [04:11:36] + Processing work unit
    [04:11:36] Core required: FahCore_65.exe
    [04:11:36] Core found.
    [04:11:36] Working on Unit 01 [February 18 04:11:36]
    [04:11:36] + Working ...
    [04:11:36] Folding@Home Client Core Version 2.47 (June 14, 2002)
    [04:11:36]
    [04:11:36] Proj: work/wudata_01
    [04:11:37] Done: 22915 -> 142975 (decompressed 623.9 percent)
    [04:11:37] nsteps: 5000000 dt: 2.000000 dt_dump: 250.000000 temperature: 298.000000
    [04:11:37] xyzfile:
    [04:11:37] " 393 p696_L939_K12M_Raleigh
    [04:11:37] 1 N 36.505646 -13.416575 39.518859 ..."
    [04:11:37] keyfile:
    [04:11:37] "parameters ./proj696.prm
    [04:11:37] NOVERSION
    [04:11:37] ARCHIVE
    [04:11:37]
    [04:11:37] cutoff 16.0
    [04:11:37] taper 12...."
    [04:11:37]
    [04:11:37] - Couldn't get size info for dyn file: work/wudata_01.dyn
    [04:11:37] Starting from initial work packet
    [04:11:37]
    [04:11:37] Protein: p696_L939_K12M_Raleigh
    [04:11:37] - Run: 90 (Clone 31, Gen 0)
    [04:11:37] - Frames Completed: 0, Remaining: 400
    [04:11:37] - Dynamic steps required: 5000000
    [04:11:37]
    [04:11:37] Writing local files:
    [04:11:37]
    [04:11:37] parameters work/wudata_01.prm
    [04:11:37] - Writing "work/wudata_01.key": (overwrite) successful.
    [04:11:37] - Writing "work/wudata_01.xyz": (overwrite) successful.
    [04:11:37] - Writing "work/wudata_01.prm": (overwrite) successful.
    [04:11:37] - Writing "work/wudata_01.key": (append) successful.
    [04:11:37]
    [04:11:37] PROJECT="work/wudata_01", NSTEPS=5000000, DT=2.0000, DTDUMP=25.000000, TEMP=298.00
    [04:11:38] TINKER: Software Tools for Molecular Design
    [04:11:38] Version 3.8 October 2000
    [04:11:38] Copyright (c) Jay William Ponder 1990-2000
    [04:11:38] portions Copyright (c) Michael Shirts 2001
    [04:11:38] portions Copyright (c) Vijay S Pande 2001
  • profdlpprofdlp The Holy City Of Westlake, Ohio
    edited February 2004
    Lammypie wrote:
    ...Any Ideas whats going on?

    [04:11:19] Core required: FahCore_65.exe

    [04:11:38] TINKER: Software Tools for Molecular Design
    They gave you a Tinker WU, most likely because with a newly-wiped drive there is no machine "history". In other words, they started you off with a simple WU.

    The Gromacs (more complex) are the ones that use the 78 core. It will be downloaded automatically when you are assigned a Gromac WU.
  • LammypieLammypie
    edited February 2004
    cheers, that explains it
  • csimoncsimon Acadiana Icrontian
    edited February 2004
    -advmethods might help also
  • mmonninmmonnin Centreville, VA
    edited February 2004
    No new tinker core has been released in awhile. Lammypie if you have SSE on that CPU make sure you are getting gromacs with the -advmethods switch.
  • res0r9lmres0r9lm Florida
    edited February 2004
    even if you didn't have sse wouldn't it still be worth while to still run the -advmethods flag w/ 3Dnow?
  • csimoncsimon Acadiana Icrontian
    edited February 2004
    res0r9lm wrote:
    even if you didn't have sse wouldn't it still be worth while to still run the -advmethods flag w/ 3Dnow?
    Yes ...!!!
  • mmonninmmonnin Centreville, VA
    edited February 2004
    SSE is still so much better.
  • res0r9lmres0r9lm Florida
    edited February 2004
    no doubt. Have a tbird 1.4 and xp 1800+ and same protein xp is using sse and it is doing frame in half the time. there is a 140mhz difference to consider also. so it's only 90% faster if megahurts were the same :eek:
Sign In or Register to comment.