HD size limit
I have a friend with a ECS K7S5A.
He has recently puchased a WD2000JB a 200GB harddrive.
Now his OS (Windows XP Prof.) can only see 128 GB.
What can he do?
Is there a BIOS update available?
Can he partition it into smaller units
for example 2 100GB?
Should he buy another controller card instead of the onboard?
He has recently puchased a WD2000JB a 200GB harddrive.
Now his OS (Windows XP Prof.) can only see 128 GB.
What can he do?
Is there a BIOS update available?
Can he partition it into smaller units
for example 2 100GB?
Should he buy another controller card instead of the onboard?
0
Comments
I will see into the XP SP1
I do not think he has installed it yet.
im like 80% sure about that
he upgraded to SP1 and then he could see the whole drive.
Thank you for all the help
With Windows XP, as far as I am aware, any problems people will have with regard to seeing large partitions will more than likely be a result of inadequate hardware support rather than an inability by XP not to view very large partitions. I was also under the impression XP and the NTFS file system itself in theory are capable of supporting partitions up in the terrabytes.
I'm pretty sure it has something to do with 48 bit LBA support. I think the patch everyone is talking about which was released for XP, was a patch for 48 bit LBA support. However an explanation of why say for example my 240GIG RAID partition was detected and formatted without any trouble (without the need for a patch or SP1) could be because technically my 240GIG partition is made up of two 120GIG drives, and therefore doesn't require the 48 bit LBA patch to support larger drives. Which in turn might stop XP having any problems with my partition.
So essentially what I think the problem is, is that with single hard drives above 137GIG you need the support patch installed under XP so it can detect the drive properly. So, the problem lies with Windows XPs support for the 48 bit LBA, (which is an attribute that drives above 137GIG have) and not actually partitions above 137GIG. Which is why I can view and format my 240GIG RAID 0 partition (which is made up of two 120GIG drives) without the patch.
Is that a bit more informative?
http://www.abit-usa.com/faq/mb/2001121901.php
Prof
PS: If you haven't done so already, please give us your input in the “Utilities Discussion – Week2” thread under General Software!!! This week we are asking for your recommended programs in these categories: HD Speed benchmark, CD Drive Speed Benchmark, Video Performance benchmark
That's okay, it was my mistake, my point was though that it's not a problem with XP's support for large partition sizes, just its support for large hard drives. (there is a difference).
However this conversation is getting a bit moot, considering the problem was fixed by Microsoft ages ago. So everyone should be happy.:D
So to sum up the thread :
If you know your motherboard supports hard drives above 137GIG, as most modern boards do (i.e your motherboards BIOS is 48-bit LBA compatible), and you are still experiencing problems under Windows XP NTFS detecting the full capacity of a hard drive/s, then the easiest way to sort it out is to install SP1 which includes a patch to fix the problem.
Cheers