p259_4Na_Mg really slow?

TheBaronTheBaron Austin, TX
edited March 2004 in Folding@Home
right now my P4 box is folding a a 25 point p259_4Na_Mg and a 120 point p859_p53dimer859. usually each one of the consoles puts out approximately 350 ppw, but right now only the 120 point console is on schedule for that. the 25 point work unit mentioned above is taking 20 minutes a frame!!!!! :shakehead anyone have any ideas whats going on here? it seems like this one unit is really slowing down my production (100 ppw)

thx

oh, tags are -forcesse -advmethods -local -service

Comments

  • Straight_ManStraight_Man Geeky, in my own way Naples, FL Icrontian
    edited March 2004
    259 is kinda slow compared to many WUs on real fast and modern boxes. Pointage seems low for what is being calced, yes. BUT, the 859 takes about 18-19 min per frame on a 3.2 GHz here, and about 27-28 min per frame on a Barton 2500+ box. The P4 has gotten few 859's, it did turn in with .989 effectiveness at about 20 min per frame, though.

    Um, when I turned in one yesterday I got 160 points, AFAIK-- let me check. DID, the final deadline is 120 days, "preferred" time is 8 days or less (they stuck a preferred turnin column in front of the now final deadline column, so points moved one cloumn right). The Stanford project summary page now has an extra column in it AFAIK. TWO time frames now are shown.

    BTW, 259 is a 70.77 pointer, final turnin time is 25 days. Make you feel a bit better????

    John D.
  • TheBaronTheBaron Austin, TX
    edited March 2004
    no, cause that means my stats program is fubared again

    something else to fix :(
Sign In or Register to comment.