SM2 is chewin a P212

redoulent

and all I have to say is, Holy this thing is huge!

16 minutes a frame!

My new FX-53 is getting 11 or 12 minutes a frame on it.

Fold on my fellow protein addicts!

fatcat

the p212 suck as far as pts/time ratio...on my machine

the p858/859 gave you 160pts and took 22-24mins/frame

the p212 gives you 75pts and takes 15-16mins/frame



>EDIT...just checked stanford and its worth 160pts...now thats nice!

mmonnin

Yep got on my 2.4 Athlon. 16:10 on it.

edcentric

A 2.07GHz TBred is at 19:50.
My 2.3 Barton is at 15:26
Dont ask what my 1.6 TBird is taking, it has two at once right now.
OK, I looked. 69min. So if only one was running it would be ~34 min. No SSE realy kills you with these.

qparadox

Yeah its AWESOME PPW. I got a ~30-40% boost on SSE machines when doing these suckers.

Medlock

fatcat wrote:

the p212 suck as far as pts/time ratio...on my machine

the p858/859 gave you 160pts and took 22-24mins/frame

the p212 gives you 75pts and takes 15-16mins/frame



>EDIT...just checked stanford and its worth 160pts...now thats nice!

It gives 135 points. :woowoo: I've got one runnin' through my console now. 25 minutes a frame. 25% completed now, maybe it'll be done by the time I get home from skool tomorrow.

Straight_Man

Time for a p212_villinURE212 (run 11, clone 70, gen 0) on a Northwood P4 (non-HT) clocked to 3.2 GHz at time of fold (April 12-13) with an ABIT BIOS-BASED Game Accellerator running that gave 3512 MHz out of EMIII bencher last time I ran Windows XP on this box (this unit folded in Linux console, and hardware settigns were unchanged in BIOS from settings then) of one of these:

Workunit total: 26 hours, 13 min.
Time per frame: 15:44 average, in min:sec.

Pretty time-inflexible. But that is how my pointage on the 13th got pumped high. The P4 box was under heavy use those days, WHILE FOLDING, though.

John D.