How do the rankings work??

MedlockMedlock Miramar, Florida Member
edited April 2004 in Folding@Home
Looking at short-media's member's rankings, I'm getting conf00sed. :confused2 I am currently in the #801 spot with 2 WU's and 19.65 points. Just before submitting this WU, I was number 959 with 1 WU and 1.65 points. The person in #802 just below me has 10 WU's completed but only 19.4 points. How does all of this work?? :rant: Can I expect that big a jump in placement with the next WU i submit? lol That one might be a while. Got my first tinker thingy and it's going by deathly slow. about 10 minutes to complete one frame. Only 11 frames completed and 389 to go. :wtf: On the other client (running two on this HT machine) I'm about 20% completed. Sucks though 'cause not too long ago my computer crashed and I lost a 98% complete WU! :aol: :bs:

Oh yeah! Yesterday I added a 933 MHz P3 to my username and Team #93! :D Unlike this machine, that one's on 24/7, so maybe it'll actually get something done! :nudge:

:smokin:

Comments

  • mmonninmmonnin Centreville, VA
    edited April 2004
    Some WUs are worth more points than others.

    Here is a list of the current running projects.
    http://folding.stanford.edu/psummary.html
  • sgstairsgstair Reverse Engineer Redmond, WA Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    Yeah you can expect a big jump in placement with your next wu, the ranking is based on points, WU's are just there for information purposes :)

    -Stephen
  • Straight_ManStraight_Man Geeky, in my own way Naples, FL Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    Some of the older, earlier work units were somewhat simpler in points awarded (smaller pointage per WU) and work in terms of calcs needed to complete them. p695's are, in contrast, BIG Tinkers. My P4 box did one, in about 36 hours.... :( And that was 24/7 folding. ONE! EXACTLY ONE! WITH -advmethods switch in use.

    Someday, will teach the P4 box to SCREAM when it gets a p695. I know when the Barton box gets one, the CPU FAN revs up to full speed.... LITERALLY.... :(

    There will be other WUs that will run LOTS more effectively, though. MOST of them do run much more effectively. :D

    John D.
  • MedlockMedlock Miramar, Florida Member
    edited April 2004
    Ahh I see. I think I'll let F@H do it's thing. 70.9 points for this p693, 11.7 for the p729. Kool. I'll be up with you in no time mmonnin! lol Looking at the basic information on the different protein simulations, it doesn't look like mine is too far from the p695. Like I said this computer isn't on 24/7, and when it is on, it isn't always folding. (For some reason some of my games will not go fullscreen with it running, but others run fine. :banghead: ) So I can prolly expect this thing to run for a looong time. Doing some quick math though, I should jump a couple hundred in the rankings! :thumbsup::leet:

    Hmm... I wonder if that old P3 got anything done...
  • Straight_ManStraight_Man Geeky, in my own way Naples, FL Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    TheGr81 wrote:
    Ahh I see. I think I'll let F@H do it's thing. 70.9 points for this p693, 11.7 for the p729. Kool. I'll be up with you in no time mmonnin! lol Looking at the basic information on the different protein simulations, it doesn't look like mine is too far from the p695. Like I said this computer isn't on 24/7, and when it is on, it isn't always folding. (For some reason some of my games will not go fullscreen with it running, but others run fine. :banghead: ) So I can prolly expect this thing to run for a looong time. Doing some quick math though, I should jump a couple hundred in the rankings! :thumbsup::leet:

    Hmm... I wonder if that old P3 got anything done...

    Concerning the games, try this:

    right click the client cog icon nex to the clock.

    Take the mouse, click on Configure....

    Click on advanced tab.

    Now, up at the top of the Configure|Advanced dialog pane\page, you will see a slider bar, right end is high priority as to what client asks for when CPU says it has idle time slices to the folding software. Soem games need mroe time slices than normal programs,. but are run at same priority, so they probably hung ebcasue client was grabbing all the CPUs time when it was idle. So, lets instead of killing folding try to decrease that priority to 50%, or take the slider pointer to the middle of the slider with mouse (drag slider pointer left halfway). NOW see if games run. When done, just do it again, but this time drag slider back to right.

    I bet this will help at least some, maybe a LOT. If it works, folding will be slower while you game, but gaming and folding will be able to run at same time.

    On the Barton I run Foldign Client at about 96% of highest priority normally, the Barton is currently OC'd to 2097 MHz and that is the greatest priority I can run folding at. With it at about 80% I can run Corel Draw 12, Word PErfect Office, AND a browser and all work, thuogh a bit slowly. At 50% priority on this slider, they run almost the same as if folding was off, the CPU has that many spare time slices to give. So, take your game, run it, minimize it, play with slider now and then, and see if you can the play the game reasonably.

    two downsides:

    First, each time you reset this slider, the WU Core calc part of folding gets restarted with current client-- client still runs adn does nto ahve to be restarted from scratch normally, so doing this many many times in a short time (like 20 minutes time) will be same in termes of accomplished folding as if folding was off. Core takes about 15 seconds on my P4 to come up and show resume in log, on the Barton it is more like 23 seconds. This is half to one third the time for a full client start from scratch, on average (that is the upside of doing it this way in the Folding Client 4.0 as opposed to earlier ones-- earlier ones, you had to restart CLIENT).

    Second, if you forget to reset slider when done, folding will be sloer until you DO remember, but upside to that is at least box will be folding when it is on even if you DO forget to turn it back to close to full or 97% priority for idle times slices.

    John D.
  • sgstairsgstair Reverse Engineer Redmond, WA Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    What games are you having trouble with?
    I'm running folding at 100% and haven't ever had a problem with any program running slowly...

    -Stephen
  • MedlockMedlock Miramar, Florida Member
    edited April 2004
    Ok, I'll try that tomorrow. But what about the console version? should I restart and config every time? That'd be a PITA...
  • MedlockMedlock Miramar, Florida Member
    edited April 2004
    @sgstair
    It's not that things won't run, they just won't maximize. Need for speed underground is one. The game i play most often besides Warcraft 3, which works fine. That 96kb FPS that Spinner posted won't go, nor will any of ATi's demos. Again, the programs run, they just won't take over my screen. This sometimes gives me errors, and I have to kill them from the task manager.
  • sgstairsgstair Reverse Engineer Redmond, WA Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    hehe Ironic :)
    I've not played NFS Underground on this computer, but the 96k fps (kkreiger-farbrausch) works fine here (then again I do have an nVidia card.. Muahaha)

    Honestly though, this sounds more like a DirectX or Driver problem than anything else :\

    -Stephen
  • MedlockMedlock Miramar, Florida Member
    edited April 2004
    Wow. This P3 (I'm on it now) is also tinkering, p638. Another 70 points if/when it completes. That's kool. Somehow got interrupted since yesterday. Grr... Hope I don't have to restart this thing every day. It's already completed 21 frames out of 400. A bit behind my rig but it's off now and this machine will be on all night. Found out Warcraft 3 works fine while folding, which is all my little bro plays on here, so it shouldn't give him any trouble.

    Well, whether Ageek's suggestions work or not, there will be a lot more folding going on for me and team short-media than there was when I started. (I let one WU finish and then left it alone as it was interfering with my computing.) Maybe my sig will become something of interest to look at before too long. lol
  • MedlockMedlock Miramar, Florida Member
    edited April 2004
    I just thought of something. This client's machine ID is 1. I want it to be 3. I can change it in client.cfg (there's no option in the GUI) but it changes back when I retart the client. One client on my main rig is also set to 1. Will either of them run into any problems? Should I just get the console version on this thing instead? I know I can change machine ID there, I've done it on my rig.
  • qparadoxqparadox Vancouver, BC
    edited April 2004
    Machine ID is a local thing in case you want to run more than one client on the same computer (which you might want to do on a HT processor and definitely would do on a dual processor box). If you want to change it I believe you can just edit client.cfg manually with no problems, just open it in notepad and make the change.

    As a side note there are some flags that will cause your output (especially on the p4) to increase. You want to start the program with -advmethods and -forceSSE flags. To do this right click on the link to the program, select properties and add those arguments to the target line.

    Just for your information, there are two main types of work units. Tinkers and Gromacs. The core they use varies greatly in both optimaztions and ability. The project still needs to do simulations on Tinkers because they can't do everything on Gromacs, but on a P4 they go dog slow.
  • edited April 2004
    If I remember correctly the conflict between games and F@H was tied to the windows version of F@H and when the computer would enter DirectX mode. From what I remember the console version would fix the problem and servicing it was even better. I believe that was from the official folding at home forums.

    KingFish
  • MedlockMedlock Miramar, Florida Member
    edited April 2004
    qparadox wrote:
    Just for your information, there are two main types of work units. Tinkers and Gromacs. The core they use varies greatly in both optimaztions and ability. The project still needs to do simulations on Tinkers because they can't do everything on Gromacs, but on a P4 they go dog slow.
    Yeah, I've noticed...

    Hmm... Can I run two consoles instead of the GUI and console? And do I really need to add -forcesse? in the console it always says sse optimizations ok. or something like that. I have -advmethods and -local on it now.
  • mmonninmmonnin Centreville, VA
    edited April 2004
    2 consoles are ok. They work just the same as the setup you have now.

    -forcesse is not needed for P4s since that is the default optimization. AMDs need it to be forced to use it.
  • Straight_ManStraight_Man Geeky, in my own way Naples, FL Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    mmonnin wrote:
    2 consoles are ok. They work just the same as the setup you have now.

    -forcesse is not needed for P4s since that is the default optimization. AMDs need it to be forced to use it.

    Mark, here, -forcesse took my P4's prod and pumped it to 1.25-1.3 times what it was without it-- on both XP and Linux. I use it on both the P4 and the Barton. Yes I've tried it both ways, for long enough to have apples to apples times for same WUs with and without, for about 15 seperate projects.

    John D.
  • MedlockMedlock Miramar, Florida Member
    edited April 2004
    Ageek wrote:
    Mark, here, -forcesse took my P4's prod and pumped it to 1.25-1.3 times what it was without it-- on both XP and Linux. I use it on both the P4 and the Barton. Yes I've tried it both ways, for long enough to have apples to apples times for same WUs with and without, for about 15 seperate projects.

    John D.

    Oh well. Whether it needs forcing or not, I guess the tag won't hurt anything, will it? *comps blows up* ....Damn. lol

    Holy crap. With WC3 running it takes about 20 minutes for this thing to tinker one frame! Usually only 10. :banghead: The GUI's about 50% complete on it's third WU. When it's done with that I'll switch to the console. I like it better. I'm gonna swith the older computer to the console as well. Need to check how far along it is first though. It's tinkering now. a P3, tinkering. :wtf: I think I'll check back next week sometime. lol 930MHz is not :leet::nudge:
  • mmonninmmonnin Centreville, VA
    edited April 2004
    The P4 should run SSE with no extra tags with a gromac WU. The AMD needs it. It wont hurt a P4 to have it on to make sure somehow it gets turned off by an improper shutdown somehow.
  • MedlockMedlock Miramar, Florida Member
    edited April 2004
    mmonnin wrote:
    The P4 should run SSE with no extra tags with a gromac WU. The AMD needs it. It wont hurt a P4 to have it on to make sure somehow it gets turned off by an improper shutdown somehow.
    What about a tinker WU? I still don't see anything about SSE on my second client here...
  • mmonninmmonnin Centreville, VA
    edited April 2004
    Tinkers cant use SSE. Only gromacs. Gromacs can also use 3dnow! on AMDs and Altivec on Macs. SSE is about 30% faster than 3dnow! tho.
  • gtghmgtghm New
    edited April 2004
    You will make some big jumps up to a certian point... then you'll get to a point where you have caught up with the core folders and then you will be licky if you get any further... About the only way would be to add more machines or faster processors to you paddock or if you get to someone who stops folding you would pass them in time...

    Welcome to the team, :)
    "g"
  • edcentricedcentric near Milwaukee, Wisconsin Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    TheGr81, hang in there and keep chipping away.
    I started folding on 900 TBird that was only on durring the days.
    Now I have a few dedicated folding boxes running and ....
    Well, that is why they call it an addiction.
  • EyesOnlyEyesOnly Sweden New
    edited April 2004
    So i wont get passed yet. :) That's good to know, yet my days are numbered. :(

    Keep up the good work. I'll wont be having this rig forever so i'll be on you like a hawk. :D
  • MedlockMedlock Miramar, Florida Member
    edited April 2004
    Aha! My first target! Eyes only, let's see.... Rank:625 127 points and 8 WU. lol I'm 699 with 56 points and 5 WU's. Catchin' up fast! Better watch out, I'm right behind ya! hehe :nudge::rockon:
    :usflag:


    EDIT: Maybe not... My newest gromacs WU (p724) is working more slowly than the TINKER WU (p693) on the other side of my processor... :banghead: Well, it's still gromacs and is only 100 frames. It'll prolly be complete before the other one. And i'll get 49 points for it! :thumbsup:

    Another edit: Better make that #681, 67 points and 6 WU's! :leet:
  • EyesOnlyEyesOnly Sweden New
    edited April 2004
    Hmm i'm folding a 100 frames, 14,2 points p1105 but it's running quite fast actually. A wu takes about 3-4 days which isn't bad at all considering that the rig isn't on 24/7 and get used for all sorts of stuff.

    Don't count me out yet. :fold::rarr:

    According to EOC you'll overtake me in 18 days. :eek: We'll see about that. :rarr: BTW let's keep further challenges in the correct thread so we don't clutter this one.
Sign In or Register to comment.