I-80 in Nebraska Getting High-Tech Gadgetry

edited April 2004 in Science & Tech
New technology will soon help drivers across the state avoid traffic tie-ups. As part of a larger $40 million plan to be carried out over the next six years, sensors will be placed under the pavement and mounted alongside Interstate 80 to monitor traffic volume and speed.
That information will be brought to drivers on electronic message boards along the highway. Nine of the signs are up and running in the Omaha area. Nine more will soon be installed in other parts of the state and an additional 25 signs will appear on Interstate 80 within the next two years. Travelers also will be able to monitor traffic by viewing color-coded maps on the Internet illustrating the pace on the highway.
Source: Excite/Associated Press

Comments

  • mmonninmmonnin Centreville, VA
    edited April 2004
    Oh great, people will be staring at the signs instead of driving!:rolleyes2
  • edited April 2004
    Traffic? Nebraska? Why don't I associate those two together. I agree MM, it'll present yet another distraction and make people think about other routes instead of focusing on the vehicle ahead they are about to rearend.

    KingFish
  • gtghmgtghm New
    edited April 2004
    KingFish wrote:
    Traffic? Nebraska?

    KingFish


    Thast's what I was thinking... LOL

    Can't beleive if you haven't experienced rush hour on the 101 in LA or the 5 in Seattle you have now Idea what the heck traffic is... LOL

    I'm sure that some of the places back east are like that too but Nebraska.... whoa... :)
  • edited April 2004
    Prolly just a test case but the rhetorical comment was fun.

    KingFish
  • primesuspectprimesuspect Beepin n' Boopin Detroit, MI Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    We've had those in michigan for years now. Around 1999, I believe. They are pretty cool actually - they'll tell you about an accident 3 or 4 miles up ahead, and tell you what lanes are blocked or if you should exit. I find them very helpful.
  • edited April 2004
    We have those signs too especially with our two big bridges that we have in our city. The difference here is that our current signs require human intervention to manually type something in on the signs to notify the public of a wreck ahead and of the interstate bypass option. With the new system there would be sensors placed in the roadway that would monitor traffic loads to let motorists know via the internet if traffic was slowed down and how congested it appeared to be. There would be cameras mounted also that would show real time images on the net of traffic congestion. All this would be done without human intervention and give drivers more information on what to base their routes rather than just notifying them of wrecks ahead. I don't know what type of system is in place in Michigan right now though. From what I gather most of the Dept. of Transportations around the states have some sort of sign system in place to warn of wrecks ahead but is considered a "dumb" system compared to the system being deployed here.

    KingFish
  • primesuspectprimesuspect Beepin n' Boopin Detroit, MI Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    Ours run on 802.11 :rarr: I drove under one that was, for some reason or another, broadcasting it's SSID one time. The SSID was "Bridge01A2" or something like that.

    /me gets out my knoppix CD. :ninja:

    They are networked, I know that much. I'm sure there's a central command center somewhere where a person can control all the signs in the area.
  • edited April 2004
    If it's like most it's controlled by your state DOT.

    KingFish
  • 289Mustang289Mustang Husker Nation
    edited April 2004
    Being from Nebraska I would agree that there isn't alot of traffic except on I-80. It's really bad around Omaha but has gotten better now that they are done with the construction. They already use the signs for those amber alerts so I think it's good that they found another use for the things :)
Sign In or Register to comment.