Nv40

gtghmgtghm New
edited July 2003 in Hardware
Just got this little tid bit from PCstats.com
The High Tech Low Down

By: Chris Angelini

It isn't a comfortable position, the one that NVIDIA is currently in. With a vile memory of the GeForce FX 5800 several months ago and accusations of benchmark cheating even more recently, the graphics giant needs something especially compelling to pull it back into the game it once definitively dominated. That product, code-named NV40, should do just that according to several sources.

At this point, the most reliable figures are the core and memory frequencies targeted by NVIDIA. By the time NV40 rolls around (late in 2003 or early 2004), the graphics processor should be running at least 550MHz, potentially on IBM's 130nm manufacturing process. Memory technology will have evolved a bit as well, and it looks like NVIDIA is expecting GDDR2 (or maybe GDDR3?) to be a viable option, even at speeds up to 700MHz. At that speed, we're looking at 44.8GB per second of bandwidth, assuming a 256-bit memory bus! NVIDIA can also be expected to incorporate support for the Vertex and Pixel Shader 3.0 specification.

Of course, early specifications are tricky to tackle. They're subject to change as unforeseen obstacles appear - NV30 was a perfect example of that. But as the year progresses and DX9 games become available, you can expect more detailed specifications of the cards that were designed to power Doom III.

Could be good? :rolleyes:

Comments

  • ThraxThrax 🐌 Austin, TX Icrontian
    edited July 2003
    holy outdated batman.

    GeForceFX 5900s are due to be out for retail any time now, and are already in the hands of several reviewers.

    They do just what they intend; beat the 9800 Pro by 20%.
  • SimGuySimGuy Ottawa, Canada
    edited July 2003
    GeForce FX 5900 & 5900 Ultra = NV35.

    nVidia GeForce FX 5900 Ultra (NV35), the successor to NV30 (GeForce FX 5800 series), was released on May 12th. NV35 is strongly based around NV30, but with modifications to provide better performance and yield. The most notable improvement in the architecture of NV35 is a doubling in width of the memory controller from 128-bit to 256-bit, providing 27.2GB/s of memory bandwidth. The NV35 core also features nVidia's UltraShadow technology, which is designed to accelerate the types of shadow operations used by the Doom 3 engine. The GeForce FX 5900 features a 450Mhz core clock speed (slightly slower than the 5800 Ultra's 500Mhz) and 256Mb of 850Mhz DDR-1 memory (compared with 1Ghz DDR-II on the 5800 Ultra). The GeForce FX 5900 Ultra is expected to retail for $499.

    Initial benchmarks show that the GeForce FX 5900 Ultra has surpassed the performance of ATI's Radeon 9800 Pro (even the updated 256Mb DDR-II version) under most benchmarks, most noticeably with early Doom 3 benchmarks.

  • gtghmgtghm New
    edited July 2003
    Thrax said
    holy outdated batman.

    GeForceFX 5900s are due to be out for retail any time now, and are already in the hands of several reviewers.

    They do just what they intend; beat the 9800 Pro by 20%.


    :scratch: Humm, I'm sorry I wasn't awhare that the following quote was old news...
    By the time NV40 rolls around (late in 2003 or early 2004), the graphics processor should be running at least 550MHz, potentially on IBM's 130nm manufacturing process. Memory technology will have evolved a bit as well, and it looks like NVIDIA is expecting GDDR2 (or maybe GDDR3?) to be a viable option, even at speeds up to 700MHz

    I must have have my head in the sand as I haven't heard much about GDDR3? :eek2:

    Sorry...
    "g"
  • TheLostSwedeTheLostSwede Trondheim, Norway Icrontian
    edited July 2003
    Thrax said
    holy outdated batman.

    GeForceFX 5900s are due to be out for retail any time now, and are already in the hands of several reviewers.

    They do just what they intend; beat the 9800 Pro by 20%.

    The weirdest thing is that it has been available here in europe for over a month, but it seems that nobody wants to buy it.
  • WuGgaRoOWuGgaRoO Not in the shower Icrontian
    edited July 2003
    cuz nvidia sux0rz :)
  • ThraxThrax 🐌 Austin, TX Icrontian
    edited July 2003
    1) Suxx0rz/sux0rz
    2) There is no qualitative data, and you're a fool if you argue with verifiable quantitative data.

    Backed into a logical corner, aren't we wuggaroo?
  • WuGgaRoOWuGgaRoO Not in the shower Icrontian
    edited July 2003
    as for qualitative data...pfff no one needs that :)

    ok, on the serious side of things, i was goofing around. Both nVidia and ATi are spectacular companies. Its a constant battle between benches, and ultimatly, we win. They keep pushing themselves to the limits and it seems like every so often one will win over the other. Personally, i live ATi....i dont know why....i just do.
  • ButtersButters CA Icrontian
    edited July 2003
    Ati? nVidia?

    It's all about the Xabre II. SiS 340 1TB/S memory bandwidth w00t!
  • danball1976danball1976 Wichita Falls, TX
    edited July 2003
    Will the nv40 be on the new PCI Express spec?
  • Al_CapownAl_Capown Indiana
    edited July 2003
    That's what it sounded like. Is pci express going to be on the athlon 64 as well?
Sign In or Register to comment.