network design

pokesquid808pokesquid808 SO CAL
edited September 2004 in Science & Tech
k here's the situation. My friends dad is looking at a new office and wants a network installed. there are going to be 60 employees expanding to 100 in 4 months. could be offsite not sure yet. but anyways he wants me to help him do the network install which is not very hard. network drops file servers what not. i'm just confused about how i'm going to get everything routed correctly. in the long run i want to have a PDC running using ldap and samba under freebsd. i was looking at networking books on how to to this. and the diagram basically said take the T1 line and run it to the router (me thats a cisco 2600) and run that to yoru switches (still deciding but i'm looking at cisco switches too). then connect the two switches using a fiber optic link, have the office split into two areas because of the limitation of cat 5e, or cat6 don't know which i'm going to use yet. then from the switch to the patch panel then to all the various network drops. does this make sense? is this the easiest way? do i need more then one router? if it's over 100m distance i know i'll have to use a repeater or somehow bridge it or somethign along those lines. some feedback would be greatly appreciated. thanks a lot guys!

Comments

  • SquillSquill Chesterfield, Va
    edited August 2004
    Do this, it'll help you out ALOT in the long run. Get Viso (if you dont have it already) and make a network diagram. It helps out so much when you have a visual of what the network looks like.

    But yeah that sounds good, and I would def stick to Cisco switches. I've never done it but I"m sure mixing Cisco routers with another brands switches can cause problems.
  • ClutchClutch North Carolina New
    edited August 2004
    What you explained seems fine to me. Kind of similar to the network at my workplace. I would stick with all Cisco.
  • primesuspectprimesuspect Beepin n' Boopin Detroit, MI Icrontian
    edited August 2004
    omg this sounds like the blind leading the blind.

    I hate to be harsh but you are talking about an enterprise level network install, and you're going to buy a book for that? Jesus, hire a networking company. You are in way over your head. I really am not trying to be mean, but you are going to be hating life when you have to do all that work without any expert guidance.

    I can tell your level of experience when you mention "cat 5e or 6" - being that there is no ratified cat 6 standard. Cat6 is a marketing term designed to sell expensive patch cords to home users at the local Office Depot.

    A book will definitely NOT teach you all the intricacies and problems of installing a 100 node enterprise network, and neither will some forum posts.
  • pokesquid808pokesquid808 SO CAL
    edited August 2004
    thank you prime, that is seriously exactly what i needed to hear. i was debating whether to hire a contracter as it is an enterprise level business. but i was curious if i could do it myself since the contractor told me 300-400 a drop. i think that is a lot considering i know how to do a drop but i really don't want to screw this up. is that too much? prime in some other posts you said you do networking for some businesses. is that about average or should i keep looking. the company i looked at was henkel and mccoy (www.henkels.com). thanks prime for bringing me back to reality:) for a second there i was thinking i could do it. not saying i couldn't, but the professional way would be to hire someone as i have only done drops for home networks, this is on a MUCH larger scale and also peoples jobs are at stake hehe. anybody know some good network contractors in so cal? thanks to all
  • ThraxThrax 🐌 Austin, TX Icrontian
    edited August 2004
    Prime, CAT6 is TIA/EIA-568-B.2-1. Ratified June, 2002.
  • primesuspectprimesuspect Beepin n' Boopin Detroit, MI Icrontian
    edited August 2004
    PokeSquid:

    300-400 is a bit high. We charge $200 - $300 depending on certain factors such as ceiling type, wall type, external or internal runs, etc. If it's a drop ceiling with drywall walls, it's 200 per 4 port drop.

    Too bad we're not in SoCal :D

    Thrax:

    Cat6 has been controversial for years. There was a standards row about it. All of today's applications and even future apps such as 10GoE will work with a Cat5e compliant cable plant. Originally Siemens came out with a "cat6" connector scheme, stating that the old standard 4pair/RJ45 scheme couldn't possibly support high power/high bandwidth apps, and then different methods of multiplexing were developed which shot that idea down. I feel sorry for anybody who "early adopted" that form of Cat6.

    Cat6 is still very controversial in the installer's community. There are many who believe (as I do) that Cat5E has a ton of life left in it, at least a 10 year future lifespan. When you are talking economics of installing miles of cable (my last install was 25,000 cable feet), a 30% premium for "cat6" is just not a smart decision. If 5E will support 100mb, 1000mb, and 10000mb, 6 is almost useless. By the time something comes along that 5E REALLY can't support (which is still up for debate since engineers are constantly finding ways to open up more bandwidth on the same wire). I really wasn't aware that the EIA/TIA ratified it. That surprises me, given the negativity with which Cat6 is viewed amongst cablejockeys. It's up there with "what a joke" status, or perhaps "how can they try to extort more money for nothing"?
  • pokesquid808pokesquid808 SO CAL
    edited August 2004
    thanks prime i'm gonna get a few more estimates before i decide who to go with. do you think it would be wise to go gig eth since everything is processed through the file server and there are going to be a lot of files flying all over the office. FYI: i just talked to my boss and he's going to do a 60/60 split on the office which means 60 in one office and 60 in another office at another location and the two will have to be linked together. now i definitely know i'm going to go professional hehe.
  • ThraxThrax 🐌 Austin, TX Icrontian
    edited August 2004
    I agree with your analysis on CAT6. Cat5E is perfectly sufficient for all current networking applications in regards to copper wiring. GbE, 10GoE.. Whatever.

    I was just noting that it received ratification, not that it was worth a damn. ;)
  • ClutchClutch North Carolina New
    edited August 2004
    but you are going to be hating life when you have to do all that work without any expert guidance.

    He has to learn one day, lol...on a serious side. It would be easier to hire someone to do it like prime said. But you are not going to be the network admin there are you? Just charge them a bunch and when it messes up make them hire someone else.....;)
  • pokesquid808pokesquid808 SO CAL
    edited August 2004
    actually me and one other guy are the IT guys. i'm the technician and networking guy, he is the systems administrator. and i'm planning on hiring one other technician but thats about it. so i would like to learn it, hopefully whoever i get to do the networking won't mind me tagging along and soaking up whatever he does. i know the basics of how to do it, i just know there is A LOT more that goes into network design then what i know.
  • ClutchClutch North Carolina New
    edited August 2004
    Do you have any certifications? Some see them as a waste of time, but I was just curious. I am looking into getting my Network+ certification by sometime winter. With that big of a place to network, with that many people, you are going to have your hands tied up with tech calls, etc..
  • pokesquid808pokesquid808 SO CAL
    edited September 2004
    clutch, yeah i have an a+ cert and network+ cert and i'm working on the mcse. yeah a lot of people see it as a waste of time but they are always good to have and studying for them you do learn a lot. and yeah it's going to be a lot of work but this is a new business and we are going to grow as the company grows. we will probably start out by hiring maybe 30 employees at the most and then every month add to the departments that need. so if the need for the it dept grows, then we will grow with the rest of the company. i just don't want the it staff to end up sitting on the lazy butts surfing the internet like at my other work place. we had so many technicians that we were sitting around doing nothing for most of the time. since i'm lead tech i don't want to pay technicians to sit around. so i think if i add only when we need the extra hands then we will stay busy. hopefully that makes some sense, i'm just rambling:)
  • ClutchClutch North Carolina New
    edited September 2004
    I agree with you. Don't want to many idle hands around you know. What kind of business is this? I'm guessing since it is in So Cal then it will be pretty busy and successful. I don't see certs as a waste of time myself, they look good on a resume along with some experience. And you do get to learn a lot as well.

    BTW: You got PM.
Sign In or Register to comment.