Points per week per client.

muddocktormuddocktor
edited September 2004 in Folding@Home
Well, I'm sitting here on the rig, bored to tears while we drill and raise the density of the drilling mud (which means kind of long hours but not much physical work for me) and I got to wondering what kind of points per week per client running the top 20 on the team are turning in. Here's what I found out:

1. csimon, 32 active clients/last 7 days, 26,838 points, 838.7 points/week/client

2. Buroja(Jake), 48 active clients/last 7 days, 23,144 points, 482.2 points/week/client

3. t1rhino, 45 active clients/last 7 days, 25,135 points, 558.6 points/week/client

4. primesuspect, 38 active clients/last 7 days, 18372 points, 483.5 points/week/client

5. Jumpin'_Jack, 1 active clients/last 7 days, 144 points, 144 points/week/client

6. muddocktor, 15 active clients/last 7 days, 14,307 points, 953.8 points/week/client

7. Vicodin, 21 active clients/last 7 days, 8,346 points, 397.4 points/week/client

8. mondi, 16 active clients/last 7 days, 8,931 points, 558.2 points/week/client

9. witenoiz, 28 active clients/last 7 days, 15,392 points, 549.7 points/week/client

10. lsevald(icrontic), 9 active clients/last 7 days, 7,208 points, 800.9 points/week/client

11. KingFish, 41 active clients/last 7 days, 20,030 points, 488.5 points/week/client

12. mmonnin, 16 active clients/last 7 days, 5,516 points, 344.8 points/week/client

13. Enisada, 28 active clients/last 7 days, 16,194 points, 578.4 points/week/client

14. JonsHandbrake, 21 active clients/last 7 days, 14,370 points, 684.3 points/week/client

15. dancer89, 26 active clients/last 7 days, 7,740 points, 297.7 points/week/client

16. Leonardo, 7 active clients/last 7 days, 2,266 points, 323.7 points/week/client

17. QCH2002, 8 active clients/last 7 days, 7,820 points, 977.5 points/week/client

18. MikeP928, 3 active clients/last 7 days, 1,368 points, 456.0 points/week/client

19. Mancabus, 18 active clients/last 7 days, 4,296 points, 238.7 points/week/client

20. necropolis_uk, 3 active clients/last 7 days, 2,145 points, 715.0 points/week/client

This doesn't take into account any clients that have been redone in the last week due to formats, etc. because there is no way for me to tell that. The active client numbers come straight from Stanford's stats pages. The 7 day production figures come from the EOC stats.

What's the point of this exercise you ask? I don't know, I was just curious to see what the top 20 averaged per client folding. :crazy: The highest average per client was QCH2002, followed by me, csimon and lsevald. The lowest (as expected, since he isn't around school to maintain the machines) was Jumpin'_Jack.

Comments

  • KingFishKingFish
    edited September 2004
    You would have to catch me with my pants down eh muddock? I had multiple machines that I was refurbishing to have some nasty crashes in which I had to reinstall the clients that pushes my averages down. I'm actually surprised that it is that high as many of the clients are meager p3 1.0 Ghz machines. It keeps the stats junkie in me happy though. Thanks for the info :)

    KF
  • mmonninmmonnin Centreville, VA
    edited September 2004
    Yeah and I just updated some of my machines to v5 and sent a few WUs in on my slow ass machines at home. That and my production has been **** lately.
  • csimoncsimon Acadiana Icrontian
    edited September 2004
    yeah I added 2.4g xp+ yesterday so now I have 32 procs ...don't know if it will remain folding or not. I built that system for a student for no pay ...I'll only ask that he keep it folding cause I already talked him in to leaving it running 24/7!
  • t1rhinot1rhino Toronto
    edited September 2004
    It also doesn't account for the fact that some people might be running mulitple clients per CPU, but it is quite interesting.
  • muddocktormuddocktor
    edited September 2004
    Yeah, I know about the multiple clients per cpu, t1. I have 2 HT P4's running 2 clients each myself. That's why I called it points/week/client. :) People running multiple clients on HT P4 machines will naturally show a lower average, such as you, witenoiz and JonsHandbrake. The only one I can think of that's running a bunch of P4 machines that has a real high average is csimon; I guess he's running 1 client per machine on most of them.

    I actually have only 9 full-time machines folding (1 laptop, 3 dual AMD, 2 HT P4 and 3 AMD single proc machines) and 1 part-time (a friend is running on his machine with my username).
  • QCHQCH Ancient Guru Chicago Area - USA Icrontian
    edited September 2004
    I am #1... WOW!!!! The slowest system I have is a PIII 600 but other than that, they are (5)P4's at 3.2 GHz, (1) P4 2 GHz, (1) AMD 2400+, and (1) AMD 3000+...
  • dragonV8dragonV8 not here much New
    edited September 2004
    That was interesting information you collected Mudd.
    Sally and I run 11 P4's and one lonely AMD XP2500+.
    2 of the P4's are 2.4's running single client. The rest are 2.8 - 3.2 HyperThreading. Sally's main puter is a 3.4Ghz, which does not appear much different to a 3.2Ghz.

    Now if only we can get a bit closer to Q's averages, hehehe.

    By the way Mudd, do you still use viscosity jugs and funnels???
  • muddocktormuddocktor
    edited September 2004
    Yes, we still use the old Marsh funnels and vis cups on the pits and shakers as a rough measure. I use more precise instruments to get plastic viscosity and yield point of the fluid though.
  • mmonninmmonnin Centreville, VA
    edited September 2004
    OH yeah and I am getting a **** load of the big WUs delete themselves after they are done. At least 10 of the 242 pointers. No wonder why production has gone down.

    Edit: Make that 25 that were listed by EM3.
  • muddocktormuddocktor
    edited September 2004
    Marc, can you post a log? I haven't had any delete themselves after finishing myself and I'm curious to see what your log says. I've had plenty of EARLY_UNIT_END warnings but the cleint sends back the info and I get credit for the amount of the wu that actually processed.
  • mmonninmmonnin Centreville, VA
    edited September 2004
    [22:34:14] Completed 98000 out of 100000 steps (98)
    [22:52:56] Writing local files
    [22:52:56] Completed 99000 out of 100000 steps (99)
    [23:11:38] Writing local files
    [23:11:39] Completed 100000 out of 100000 steps (100)
    [23:11:39] Writing final coordinates.
    [23:11:41] Past main M.D. loop
    [23:12:41]
    [23:12:41] Finished Work Unit:
    [23:12:41] - Reading up to 155648 from "work/wudata_01.arc": Read 155648
    [23:12:41] - Reading up to 25492 from "work/wudata_01.xtc": Read 25492
    [23:12:41] goefile size: 0
    [23:12:46]
    [23:12:54] CoreStatus = 75 (117)
    [23:12:54] Error opening or reading from a file.
    [23:12:54] Deleting current work unit & continuing...
    [23:12:58] Trying to send all finished work units

    [21:53:50] Completed 98000 out of 100000 steps (98)
    [22:12:48] Writing local files
    [22:12:54] Completed 99000 out of 100000 steps (99)
    [22:31:52] Writing local files
    [22:31:59] Completed 100000 out of 100000 steps (100)
    [22:31:59] Writing final coordinates.
    [22:32:01] Past main M.D. loop
    [22:33:01]
    [22:33:01] Finished Work Unit:
    [22:33:01] - Reading up to 270337 from "work/wudata_05.arc": Read 270337
    [22:33:01] - Reading up to 25604 from "work/wudata_05.xtc": Read 25604
    [22:33:01] goefile size: 0
    [22:33:01] logfile size: 79685
    [22:33:01] Leaving Run
    [22:33:02] - Writing 457790 bytes of core data to disk...
    [22:33:02] - Could not write to results file.
    [22:33:02] - Error: Could not write out results to file
    [22:33:02] - Shutting down core
    [22:33:02]
    [22:33:02] Folding@home Core Shutdown: FILE_IO_ERROR
    [22:33:12] CoreStatus = 75 (117)
    [22:33:12] Error opening or reading from a file.
    [22:33:12] Deleting current work unit & continuing...
    [22:33:16] Trying to send all finished work units

    Many of them end like this. On my dualie there are only a few MB left on the hdd as its only like a 1.4Gb. Well I only found those on my dualie and some of the Lincs/early end unit errors on some of the other machines.

    Not sure if the 25 is correct. I just went back thru EM3 and counted the number of times one has been deleted in the queue.
  • muddocktormuddocktor
    edited September 2004
    Marc, those don't look like p1301 or p1302 bigwu units though; the files they are trying to write look way too small for those 2 work units. What work units were those?

    Here's how a p1301 looks when it finishes on my laptop; check the file sizes compared to yours.

    [03:38:34] Completed 99000 out of 100000 steps (99)
    [03:52:56] Writing local files
    [03:52:56] Completed 100000 out of 100000 steps (100)
    [03:52:56] Writing final coordinates.
    [03:53:01] Past main M.D. loop
    [03:54:01]
    [03:54:01] Finished Work Unit:
    [03:54:01] - Reading up to 2868024 from "work/wudata_05.arc": Read 2868024
    [03:54:01] - Reading up to 25436 from "work/wudata_05.xtc": Read 25436
    [03:54:01] goefile size: 0
    [03:54:01] logfile size: 86853
    [03:54:01] Leaving Run
    [03:54:02] - Writing 3062477 bytes of core data to disk...
    [03:54:02] ... Done.
    [03:54:02] - Shutting down core
    [03:54:02]
    [03:54:02] Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT
    [03:54:05] CoreStatus = 64 (100)
    [03:54:05] Unit 5 finished with 97 percent of time to deadline remaining.
    [03:54:05] Updated performance fraction: 0.971092
    [03:54:05] Sending work to server


    [03:54:05] + Attempting to send results
    [03:54:05] - Reading file work/wuresults_05.dat from core
    [03:54:05] (Read 3062477 bytes from disk)
    [03:54:05] Connecting to http://171.67.89.154:8080/
    [03:57:30] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server
    [03:57:30] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)
    [03:57:30] (171.67.89.154:8080)
    [03:57:30] - Error: Could not transmit unit 05 (completed September 11) to work server.
    [03:57:31] - 1 failed uploads of this unit.
    [03:57:31] Keeping unit 05 in queue.
    [03:57:31] Trying to send all finished work units


    [03:57:31] + Attempting to send results
    [03:57:31] - Reading file work/wuresults_05.dat from core
    [03:57:31] (Read 3062477 bytes from disk)
    [03:57:31] Connecting to http://171.67.89.154:8080/
    [04:00:19] Posted data.
    [04:00:19] Initial: 0000; - Uploaded at ~16 kB/s
    [04:00:28] - Averaged speed for that direction ~11 kB/s
    [04:00:28] + Results successfully sent
    [04:00:28] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home.
    [04:00:28] + Number of Units Completed: 29
Sign In or Register to comment.