3DMark05 Review

Omega65Omega65 Philadelphia, Pa
edited October 2004 in Science & Tech
3DMark05 Reviews

Techreport
3D Velocity
Driverheaven
Bjorn 3D
Bit-Tech
Tweaktown
Techreport

Among the older cards, the Radeon 9800 Pro and 9600 XT both look very good. The same can't be said for the GeForce FX series, which suffers yet another ignominious humiliation at the hands of a new release of 3DMark. Obviously, 3DMark05 is very polygon and pixel shader intensive, and the GeForce FX architecture just isn't up to the task, despite the improvements NVIDIA has made to the runtime compiler in its graphics driver over time. Even the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra, with over 30GB/s of memory bandwidth and 3.8 gigatexels/s of fill rate, can't match the humble Radeon 9600 XT.
Source: [url=]Various[/url]

Comments

  • RWBRWB Icrontian
    edited September 2004
    3D Mark is so great, helps to make sure that your system is always performing at it's best. Plus you get all the visuals, I still get a kick out of watching the nature scene from 2003.

    I should get about 3000+ points according to their results.
  • entropyentropy
    = downloading, if only to see the demo quality and see his card destroyed :(
     Yah-Der-Hey (Wisconsin)
    edited September 2004
    = downloading, if only to see the demo quality and see his card destroyed :(
  • djstubbsdjstubbs NJ
    edited September 2004
    score = 248.

    god damn my 5200 ultra.
  • KometeKomete Member
    edited September 2004
    1933 on my 9500pro.. with some overclocking hopfully I'll reach 2100 :( bummer
  • dennis
    edited October 2004
    ha don't be sad i only got 980 whit mij Feforce FX 5900XT
Sign In or Register to comment.