Opteron 246 (2.00ghz) 1P Review

Omega65Omega65 Philadelphia, Pa
edited August 2003 in Science & Tech
<a href="http://www.amdzone.com/articleview.cfm?ArticleID=1328&quot; target=_blank>AMDZone: Opteron 246 1P Review</a>

<i>
<b>Athlon 64 Questions, Conclusion</b>

So does the Opteron 246 paired with nForce 3 Professional have a clear lead in performance over the 3.2GHz P4? It depends on the benchmarks, but our tests seem to indicate that the Opteron is the overall winner. An extra 200MHz from Intel or Prescott may very well swing the advantage back to Intel however. An extra 200MHz for Opteron would clearly put the CPU out ahead in most tests by a good margin. It boils down to who is able to ramp up MHz faster in Q4, and how soon in Q4 Prescott will be released.

Also of obvious question is what clock speed will Athlon 64 be released in September, and whether or not this will be a Socket 940 rebadged Opteron, or a Socket 754 Athlon 64 with a single channel memory controller. Clock speed guesses range from 2GHz to 2.4GHz, and evidence seems to point to a Socket 940 Athlon 64 perhaps simultaneously launched with the Socket 754 model. Will there be MHz ratings or a model number system? No one knows for sure, but with no 3.4GHz P4 expected in time for the Athlon 64 launch it may be that AMD for the first time in many months will regain a clear performance advantage.
</i>

Comments

  • BlackHawkBlackHawk Bible music connoisseur There's no place like 127.0.0.1 Icrontian
    edited August 2003
    IMHO 2 sockets for AMD is gonna bite them in the @ss later.
  • TheLostSwedeTheLostSwede Trondheim, Norway Icrontian
    edited August 2003
    This also depends a lot on who that is doing the reviews...I read a review on the Asus Nforce3/Opteron yesterday and the Opteron didn´t came ahead in ANY tests. Close battle in a few, but never ahead.
  • ThraxThrax 🐌 Austin, TX Icrontian
    edited August 2003
    That was the 144 though, mack. 200MHz slower.
  • TheLostSwedeTheLostSwede Trondheim, Norway Icrontian
    edited August 2003
    Thrax said
    That was the 144 though, mack. 200MHz slower.

    Ok, my bad.

    So those 200 mhz will convince us all that it pwns any Intel cpu then? Nahh. Nothing sensational yet. However, until i´m proved the opposite, i blame the Nforce3 chipset which i believe will flop totally. Then again, mobo manufacturers does make 200 versions of the same motherboard theese days so... you´ll never know.
  • ThraxThrax 🐌 Austin, TX Icrontian
    edited August 2003
    Take a look Mack:

    The 144 lost almost every test.

    The 146 is 200MHz faster and won 15 of 17 tests.

    You think another 200MHz won't matter?

    1.2GHz slower and the processor wins 90% of the tests (146 to 3.2C). 1GHz slower and it wins all of them (148 to 3.2C)?

    You CAN'T tell me that it's not impressive.
  • TheLostSwedeTheLostSwede Trondheim, Norway Icrontian
    edited August 2003
    What this is all about is to win over a lot of Intel users and gain marketshares. The difference is just to small IMO.
    I´m telling ya, if i had a P4 3.2/Canterwood setup, i wouldn´t get rid of it and get a setup like that cause of those results.
  • ThraxThrax 🐌 Austin, TX Icrontian
    edited August 2003
    It's not about switching, it's about signing on all the people (A large majority of the computing world) that are sitting around with p4 1.7A, or p4 2.0B on crappy chipsets.
  • Omega65Omega65 Philadelphia, Pa
    edited August 2003
    One thing you have to admit, is that the Opteron x46 gives you PR3200+ performance at 1/2 the power consumption.

    For once AMD has the low power chip.
  • BlackHawkBlackHawk Bible music connoisseur There's no place like 127.0.0.1 Icrontian
    edited August 2003
    But will the masses know it? ;)
Sign In or Register to comment.