Athlon64-M 3300+ Pic

Omega65Omega65 Philadelphia, Pa
edited August 2003 in Science & Tech
via <a href="http://www.ocworkbench.com/ocwbcgi/newspro/viewnews.cgi?newsid1061460370,57839,&quot; target=_blank>OCWorkbench</a> Athlon 64-M (Mobile CPU) 3300+ unveiled at QuakeCon2003

Athlon64-M 3300+ Pic

Comments

  • ThraxThrax 🐌 Austin, TX Icrontian
    edited August 2003
    Fakery.
  • TheLostSwedeTheLostSwede Trondheim, Norway Icrontian
    edited August 2003
    Isnt the core supposed to be much smaller than that? Must be a fake.
  • shwaipshwaip bluffin' with my muffin Icrontian
    edited August 2003
    possibly the entire chip is smaller and therefore the core looks bigger in that pic?
  • mmonninmmonnin Centreville, VA
    edited August 2003
    But then the arrow and writing would be bigger as well.

    The core is bigger, not sure how big tho.
  • ShortyShorty Manchester, UK Icrontian
    edited August 2003
    This is an M series chip, which would lead me to think that maybe it's got a different core design and no heatspreader :)

    Definitely different from the desktop 64 design. Who really knows? Only AMD and a few select people ;)
  • ThraxThrax 🐌 Austin, TX Icrontian
    edited August 2003
    If their naming scheme is consistent, then the Athlon 64-M should be nothing more than the 940 pin Athlon64...And that means it should have a heatspreader.
  • Omega65Omega65 Philadelphia, Pa
    edited August 2003
    1st Post edited...

    Athlon 64-M (Mobile CPU) 3300+ unveiled at QuakeCon2003
  • ThraxThrax 🐌 Austin, TX Icrontian
    edited August 2003
    aaaHAH!

    Mobile. There we go.
  • ShortyShorty Manchester, UK Icrontian
    edited August 2003
    Thrax said
    aaaHAH!

    Mobile. There we go.

    w00t! I was right ;D
  • mmonninmmonnin Centreville, VA
    edited August 2003
    Thats what I thought it was from the beginning.
Sign In or Register to comment.