Domain Administrator - User Rights ?

ZanthianZanthian Mitey Worrier Icrontian
edited May 2005 in Science & Tech
Hello All,

I have a question for any other domain administrators out there.
I am new to this role and I have hit a bump with the HR person at my company.
I have everyone on the server (except for the HR person) and their profiles backed up on the server with raid and online backup and tape backup for data safety. Well the issue with her is that I would have access to view employee information if she put the information on the server. She won't even let me do an install on her computer without watching me...
So, is she just more paranoid than most? How do other companies handle confidential information?

As the domain administrator will you always have rights to access everyones files? I know that I will have access to log onto her computer and access her files if she joins the domain. How can I make a section of files that are viewable by her and the president of the company but not to the domain administrator or any other administrative account?

What is the industry standard on this issue?

Thanks for any assistance or feedback :)

Comments

  • TexTex Dallas/Ft. Worth
    edited May 2005
    Yes the domain administrator should always ALWAYS have access to the files.
    Its your job tyo manage those files and back them up etc..

    I have been in this buisness 20 years. And twice had situations like yours come up and by a co-incidense maybe both were PR managers/clerks and both were fraudently cutting themselves manual PR checks and recording them to other employees ID's. One nailed them for almost $200,000 over a couple years. The checks to himself were small and spread out over 1200 employees. Most don't know when they get their W2's if there is a extra couple hundred bucks on there. And if the employee called to complain he got... The PR manager who of course appologized printed him a corrected W2 of course.

    She is full of crap. The files should be stored on the server where they are backed up and managed by the IT staff. They are company property managed by the IS/IT staff they are not hers.

    I would worry about her.

    Tex
  • QCHQCH Ancient Guru Chicago Area - USA Icrontian
    edited May 2005
    Another option...

    Install Encryption Software on her PC (and any other HR personnel). Have each of them encrypt their files with the same password. Have them store the password in a lock box in the HR department. Every 120 days, they change the password. If anyone leaves the department, change the password. Then, backup their systems as usual. You won't be able to view any of he files, but HR can. Leave them to the task of setting up the procedures for changing the password. You just maintain the backup of data and the domain.

    OR... Install a tape backup system in her office. Print instructions as to how to do a backup.. then leave it be. If it dies, tell her that it's her responsibility not yours. You can't be trusted....

    In most places I've seen.... Only one or two IT personnel have total rights and they make sure that the areas that are sensitive remain secure to everyone else but HR. A certain amount of trust needs to be granted to IT managers. The DO have tons of responsibilities. If the HR person cannot trust you, she needs to be able to back that up with reasons why NOT to trust you. You, on the other hand, need to display a great deal of trustworthiness. It's a balancing game... IT should have total access... It's your butt if she fries her PC and all the data gets hosed, she'll blame you anyway.
  • ZanthianZanthian Mitey Worrier Icrontian
    edited May 2005
    Thanks for the feedback guys. She is completely responsible for her files right now. I am not comfortable with that being the case, so I might look into the encryption software you mentioned QCH2002.

    The President of the company asked the question, "What does a Microsoft or IBM do? Is there one person in that company that has access to all of the information?"
    Unfortunately being new to this role I didn't have a good answer on that topic for him.
    What do you guys think?
  • TheBaronTheBaron Austin, TX
    edited May 2005
    Zanthian wrote:
    Thanks for the feedback guys. She is completely responsible for her files right now. I am not comfortable with that being the case, so I might look into the encryption software you mentioned QCH2002.

    The President of the company asked the question, "What does a Microsoft or IBM do? Is there one person in that company that has access to all of the information?"
    Unfortunately being new to this role I didn't have a good answer on that topic for him.
    What do you guys think?
    absolutely not. In a large-scale company like Microsoft or IBM all data, even HR employee data, is backed up on servers managed by IT. lets put it this way, its not like she has some kind of special security access to view this information. she is trusted with access to this information, and as an IT so should you. otherwise, if her computer has some kind of issue, all that data goes to ****. just make sure that when you add it to your domain, only ITS, her, and execs have access. identity theft could happen regardless, its not something you should be making a huge deal about
  • QCHQCH Ancient Guru Chicago Area - USA Icrontian
    edited May 2005
    Zanthian wrote:
    Is there one person in that company that has access to all of the information?"

    As for that question.... no company should have just one person in control to everything. Multiple people have access to data. Most EXEC. have total access and then the further down the food chain, the less info you have. HR should have HR info. Production should have copyright data access. HR should have no business looking at specs on a product and a manager of line crew shouldn't be viewing HR data on anyone but their own employee’s....

    If only one person had access to all the data, if that person died suddenly, the system would collapse.
  • GHoosdumGHoosdum Icrontian
    edited May 2005
    Dave - you, as the Admin there, should have complete rights to everything. The company is small enough that you are essentially a member of management even though you don't have any direct reports - that gives you the authority to have the access to that data. You also have the need to access it, because you are the only thing keeping the IT Infrastructure of the company from falling to pieces. If she maintains sole control over the data, that's one huge Risk (yes with a capital R) for the company, because of both the scary situation that Tex described as well as the data's integrity.

    If she's not stealing from the company, her motivation might be to screen you from being able to see all of the employee salary data and such. Most companies are very wary of employees being ever seeing such info because of jealousy, etc... but I think good data integrity is important enough to the company that they really can just get over it and let you join her to the domain.
  • ZanthianZanthian Mitey Worrier Icrontian
    edited May 2005
    Here is a short review:
    Reasons that IT needs access to all files for the company:
    1) To maintain a high level of data integrity for the entire company.
    a. Backups monitored by IT and not individuals in the company.
    b. To ensure access to data in case of personnel lose
    2) Uphold the company policy of reviewing files on everyone’s desktops and laptops
    a. Including Email and Local Disks
    b. Holds everyone accountable.

    Reasons not to give IT access to data:
    1) Trust issues
    a. Can IT or upper level Executives handle having access to sensitive data?

    Disadvantages of not giving IT access to data:
    1) Potential for loss of data
    a. Downtime
    b. Potential permanent lose of pertinent information
    c. Can lead to failure of Company

    Is there anything I should add to this list?
  • rykoryko new york
    edited May 2005
    NDA---non-disclosure agreement should be signed by you to ease any of their worrying, but you should have total access.

    A few years back i worked on a legal DB of expert witness testimony and related files for a defense attorney assoc. All of the data was very sensitive and could have buried individuals if leaked. The whole team that i worked with needed to sign NDA's.

    oops, i might have just broken my contract... ;D
  • ZanthianZanthian Mitey Worrier Icrontian
    edited May 2005
    Well my attempt to reason with the President failed... :(
    He said that I have to earn the right to view the information.
    Aparently, since i am only a Systems Specialist and not a VP in the company there is no reason for me to see that information. Insert Brick wall.

    I need to find solutions, such as the encryption software mentioned above, to allow them to have data that I can not read, but that I can monitor the storage of for backup purposes.

    So, Any specific links to software would be helpful...
    Also, any other advice on how to implement a solution as such would be welcome.
  • CBCB Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Der Millionendorf- Icrontian
    edited May 2005
    I'd say:

    Get them to agree that if you don't have access to the information, then you are not responcible for it, so that they can't blame you if something goes wrong...

    Then, put peanutbutter on the harddrive head.
Sign In or Register to comment.