PCI-X / PCI slot for raid card..
I've been looking at various solutions for my ongoing storage woes and I think my best bet is a dedicated SATA Raid card. I thought I'd have to buy a new motherboard since all the cards I've looked at are either PCI-X or PCI-E, my 'server' only has PCI slots. But I was looking through EBay and I saw this beauty:
Ebay link
which says it supports PCI-X and PCI. I'm guessing I won't see the same performance with standard PCI but as long as it works.... anyway, does this mean that all PCI-X cards are backwards compatible with PCI slots? Or is it a unique feature of this card?
Ebay link
which says it supports PCI-X and PCI. I'm guessing I won't see the same performance with standard PCI but as long as it works.... anyway, does this mean that all PCI-X cards are backwards compatible with PCI slots? Or is it a unique feature of this card?
0
Comments
i suggest a Highpoint or an Areca raid controller. myself and DragonV8 both have Areca cards and they are very nice. i belive he uses a 1220, and i use a 1230.
How many drives are you looking to hook up to this array?
1220 8 port http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16816131004
1230 12 port http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16816131006
highpoint 4 port http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16816115027
highpoint 8 port
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16816115026
PCI-E card: would require new motherboard, CPU etc... best performance but pricey
PCI-X card: would go in an old server, probably low performance but very cheap.
PCI: this is what I want information on, not sure how performace would be, cheapest option.
my favoured option is option 3, since I have a board with free PCI slots in my 'server' already. Option 2 is another cheap option since I can get a server from Ebay with a blisteringly fast PIII-700 and those all important PCI-X slots for about £50, but I doubt it will perform very well. Option 1 is my best bet for performance, but I really don't want to shell out that kind of money.
Just for some more info: I currently have 2 300GB SATA drives in RAID 0, connected to the onboard ports on my ABIT-KV7 board. What I want to do is create an expandable solution capable of holding at least 900GB (the 600 I already have plus another 300GB disk), with some kind of data protection (RAID 5?) and the capacity to add more drives in the future. So I need something that will allow me to setup a 600GB array, copy all my data to it, then add the original 2*300GB drives and end up with a RAID 5 array of 3*300GB data drives and 1*300GB hot swap (or whatever it is in RAID 5) drive which will allow me to add more drives to the array as I go along.
PCI-X seems to be the way to go for you. There also appears to be more than one version of PCI-X the standard now seems to be PCI-X 2.2.
Tex is the resident raid guru here on the forums, but i think his choice of cards is 3Ware, or Promise i may be mistaken. The cheapest 3Ware card newegg carries that is PCI-X, Raid 5, SATA and online expansion is
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16816116025
Highpoint RocketRaid 2220
Tex warned me away from the highpoint cards, but it's about half the price of any other card that does what I want it to.
I would really appreciate if someone could help me out on a related issue. Sorry it's slightly off topic.
I also have no PCI-Express slots on my motherboard either. I am trying to buy a SATA drive now, so that if I upgrade my PC, I can just transfer the harddrive. So I'll buy a PCI controller to at least get the thing working.
I downloaded PCI Sniffer, which gave me a report showing every bus device with the following: Cacheline: 0 * 32 bit.
There were no 64bits.
I believe v2.1, 5V Conventional PCI is 32bits, whereas v2.2, 3.3V Conventional PCI is 64bits.
Question: Am I correct in assuming that all my PCI slots are therefore v2.1
Question: Am I correct in assuming any PCI cards I buy must be v2.1 compliant
Question: Finally, can anyone please identify the slot in the attached picture, and what it would be used for. It doesn't look like any I'm familiar with.
Thanks
Javis