weird differences in scsi scores
ok here are my two scores from two different benchmarks.
This is an IBM Ultrastar OEM 15k drive.
http://hatop.servepics.com/atto.jpg
http://hatop.servepics.com/hdtach.jpg
why is the atto mark so much lower. Ive had much better performance before i changed over to XP Pro. I have installed the supposed write cache fix as well.
Thanks
This is an IBM Ultrastar OEM 15k drive.
http://hatop.servepics.com/atto.jpg
http://hatop.servepics.com/hdtach.jpg
why is the atto mark so much lower. Ive had much better performance before i changed over to XP Pro. I have installed the supposed write cache fix as well.
Thanks
0
Comments
ATTO tries to bypass the disk cache using an OS level filesystem commandl they call the write_thru_flag which Microsoft for years did not support thru a bug. They found it and fixed it first on XP and has now implemented it on win2k also in sp3. Luckily nothing I have ever seen in real life uses it anyway excecpt ATTO and file copies using windows explorer. It also does not effect the writes at all just the reads.
But because hdtach bypasses the OS and the filesystem then cluster size and a host of other variables that effect real life performance are also bypassed. HDtach is more of a theoretical limit of what your top performance could be and not what you will probably get.
Tex