Super Battery Developed
Winga
MrSouth Africa Icrontian
The boffins at MIT have come up with a battery that recharges itself in a few seconds and might never need replacing.
Rechargable and disposable batteries use a chemical reaction to produce energy. Although effective, after many charges and discharges the battery loses capacity and needs to be replaced.
The MIT researchers covered the electrodes with nanotubes which increased the surface area. This enabled the capacitor to store more energy.
In tests, the batteries could be re-used many times and could be recharged in a matter of seconds rather than a matter of hours.
Rechargable and disposable batteries use a chemical reaction to produce energy. Although effective, after many charges and discharges the battery loses capacity and needs to be replaced.
The MIT researchers covered the electrodes with nanotubes which increased the surface area. This enabled the capacitor to store more energy.
In tests, the batteries could be re-used many times and could be recharged in a matter of seconds rather than a matter of hours.
Source: The InquirerThe technology would be good for laptops, hearing aids and battery powered cars. Of course having batteries that are recharged quickly take humanity one step closer to total redundancy of the male.
0
Comments
But it sounds like great news nonetheless
edit-- See my third post in this thread (post#12), I think it's 6 minutes instead of 12.
and EMT, there is a slight error in your calculations. Considering that V in the us is 110, then 1000watts would take 9.09 amperes.
Most house sockets are wired to a 15 amp circuit, which will give you 1650 watts, some are wired 20amps with a special socket which will give 2200 watts.
And you are talking about a capacitor, not a battery. Capacitors can charge as fast as the current is given to them. and most laptop baterries are around 30a/hrs I believe? maybe less? im not sure. so if you are figuring 12 volts at 30 a/hrs, that is 360 watt/hrs of electricity, and if the charge can do 1000 hours, if not more, then it sholud be able to charge in 360/1000=.36 hours = 21.6 minutes.
I am pretty damn sure that my figures are off, because it should be much quicker than that. I'm too tired. capacitors should be able to charge very wuickle. anyway, om to tires to typw anymore.
You can't just multiply AC voltage times AC current to get Watts (though that works for DC). The reason is that you're calculating average power, not peak power, and the voltage times current wave results in a sine^2 power wave. The average of a sine^2 wave is half of its peak, so (using round figures) 100VAC * 20AAC = 2000Wpeak or 1000Wrms.
airbornflight, you're right, I'm not talking about any specific kind of battery. Just the limit on how fast you can store the required energy for a certain period of time, based on device's power consumption and how much power you can get from the wall.
edit-- See my third post in this thread (post#12), I think it's 6 minutes instead of 12, 2000W instead of 1000, due to the fact that the 110V and 20A figures are already RMS instead of amplitude. Thanks airbornflight
well, I'm not an ee, but from what I know about AC voltage is that it is positive half of the time, and negative half of the time. so wouldnt that come out to 0 volts average?
EMT, you may very well know more than me, but the reason that I think my figures are correct is because I have a 1500 watts space heater in my room that runs on a 15 amp circuit.
The way I was taught ac, was that the power and negative are on one pole, and they share a common ground, which the common term comes from 3 phase power, because all of the 3 phases share one common ground. Anymore than that I do not really know.
Well at least that's an interesting number to know. And.. good thing they haven't given me my degree yet