It depends on the WU you get, some suck, some don't. My E6600 is crunching on a pair of p2411's at 20 minutes a frame, that works out to 432 points per day, per core. I've also been stuck with a couple of amber WU's, and got far less than that, but I don't recall the number off the top of my head.
The biggest thing you can do is to allow big WU's. It increases your ram usage, (I have seen upwards of 106mb per core, although with 2gb of ram, it shouldn't be an issue), but you get more points for them.
If you go to the FAH forums, you'll see that they really don't like to talk about folding performance in PPD. Basically- you can't. There are just too many real-world variables. They talk more about FLOPS and instruction sets like SSEs. Maybe a better measure of your Folding capability would be to compare your system with a scientific or CPU benchmark like Sandra 2007 (which was used here) .
If what I've been reading is correct you should, core-to-core and cycle-for-cycle, do 15% or more productionover an AMD X2 in this category- and I can personally say that the Toledo is a good Folder. You shouldn't be disappointed.
Hi gravite the best way to check PPD on any folding platform IMHO is by checking at uncle_fungus's site they have all sort's of hardware comparison's. http://www.fahinfo.org/index.php?news=true
If its dedicated for F@H, go SMP (you´ll need a 64bit Linux distro). If not, then its just luck to get 2 bonus WUs when folding under Windows with 2 console clients.
Comments
The biggest thing you can do is to allow big WU's. It increases your ram usage, (I have seen upwards of 106mb per core, although with 2gb of ram, it shouldn't be an issue), but you get more points for them.
If you go to the FAH forums, you'll see that they really don't like to talk about folding performance in PPD. Basically- you can't. There are just too many real-world variables. They talk more about FLOPS and instruction sets like SSEs. Maybe a better measure of your Folding capability would be to compare your system with a scientific or CPU benchmark like Sandra 2007 (which was used here) .
If what I've been reading is correct you should, core-to-core and cycle-for-cycle, do 15% or more production over an AMD X2 in this category- and I can personally say that the Toledo is a good Folder. You shouldn't be disappointed.
http://www.fahinfo.org/index.php?news=true