Xp or 2k??

2»

Comments

  • EnverexEnverex Worcester, UK Icrontian
    edited November 2005
    I have to say 2k too. Smaller drive and memory footprint than XP, less unecessary garbage ("ooh, pretty colours") although it does have the longer boot time.
  • SpinnerSpinner Birmingham, UK
    edited November 2005
    Well, that sure blew the dust off this thread. ;D

    Since XP SP2, 2K has had nothing on XP, IMO. :)
  • NosferatuNosferatu Arizona
    edited November 2005
    My vote is for 2000. The only reason I went XP is for a 64-bit OS and it didn't cost me an arm and a leg.
  • GnomeWizarddGnomeWizardd Member 4 Life Akron, PA Icrontian
    edited November 2005
    HOLY BEJEBUS! Talk about thread reviving!
  • QCHQCH Ancient Guru Chicago Area - USA Icrontian
    edited November 2005
    XP - Remote Desktop and management and more secure... but more overhead. :scratch:
Sign In or Register to comment.