5200ultra not overclocking

edited June 2003 in Hardware
I got a 5200ultra and when I try to overclock it in riva tuner im not able to move the sliders. Has this happend to any one and how can i fix this?

never mind I fixed it I downloaded some update's and it worked.
is it normal to have the core run at 55C.

thats 55C idle iv seen it go up to 80+C.




«1

Comments

  • CCWCCW Suffolk, UK
    edited June 2003
    Thats high, the FX core does create a lot of heat, id replace the cooling if i were you or get some more air flowing ove rit

    Craig
  • edited June 2003
    i just sent it back. it was like a heat wave around my computer.
  • EnverexEnverex Worcester, UK Icrontian
    edited June 2003
    <img src="http://atomnet.co.uk/dl?img=cartman&quot; align="left"> Cartman Says: Dont post multiple times, edit your original post biatch.



    NS
  • edited June 2003
    sorry
  • CCWCCW Suffolk, UK
    edited June 2003
    Originally posted by matt
    i just sent it back. it was like a heat wave around my computer.

    What you gonna replace it with?

    Craig
  • EnisadaEnisada Edmonton Member
    edited June 2003
    Yet another reason to buy ATI instead of Nvidia....
    Muhahahaha...
  • edited June 2003
    Originally posted by Enisada
    Yet another reason to buy ATI instead of Nvidia....
    Muhahahaha...
    ATI all the way Ill get some ati card like a 9000pro and vmod it.
  • EnisadaEnisada Edmonton Member
    edited June 2003
    Let me know how that goes I got a 9000Pro in my other system. It is getting an upgrade here soon to a 9600Pro though. Always looking to get a few extra Mhz out of it....
  • stoopidstoopid Albany, NY New
    edited June 2003
    Originally posted by matt

    ATI all the way Ill get some ati card like a 9000pro and vmod it.

    Though the performance of my 9700 AIW is great, I've had a few driver quirks (mouse missing in certain apps, stuttering 2D, random crashes when watch cable TV) that I rarely experienced with nvidia cards... ATI still has a ways to go in developing 100% functional drivers... but I'll take the occassional bug over less performance anyday.
  • EnisadaEnisada Edmonton Member
    edited June 2003
    Hey stoopid...lol. What drivers are you using for your card??
  • stoopidstoopid Albany, NY New
    edited June 2003
    Originally posted by Enisada
    Hey stoopid...lol. What drivers are you using for your card??

    Whatever ones are listed for the 9700 AIW on ati's site (you have to download a total of 3 components and follow specific instructions to install them properly).

    I picked the username for the times people say "I agree with stoopid" :p
  • EnisadaEnisada Edmonton Member
    edited June 2003
    Very good, I like the name. As long as you are sure that they are the new 3.4's then you should be good. It may sound like a stupid (no pun intended) question but do you have any other video drivers installed other than the CATs??? Sometime you never know...
  • edited June 2003
    $359 RADEON 9800 Pro 128MB
    $265 - RADEON 9700 Pro
    $204 - RADEON 9700 128MB
    $180 RADEON 9600 Pro Ultra
    $167 - RADEON 9600 Pro 128MB
    $138 RADEON 9500 128MB
    $126 - RADEON 9500 64MB
    $77 - RADEON 9200 128MB
    $66 RADEON 9200 64MB
    $75 RADEON 9100 128MB
    $62 - RADEON 9100 64MB
    $78 - RADEON 9000 Pro 128MB
    $59 - RADEON 9000 Pro 64MB
    $56 - RADEON 9000

    If I get the money I might get the 9600, iv seen some good overclocks with it.
  • EnisadaEnisada Edmonton Member
    edited June 2003
    What is the 9600Pro Ultra?? Is it a higher clocked card??
  • edited June 2003
    Originally posted by Enisada
    What is the 9600Pro Ultra?? Is it a higher clocked card??
    most likely.
  • EnisadaEnisada Edmonton Member
    edited June 2003
    This by a third party manufacturer or from ATI themselves??
  • edited June 2003
    dont know i just got a price list from pricewatch.com
  • EnisadaEnisada Edmonton Member
    edited June 2003
    I just looked at ATI's site and it didn't say anything about a 9600Pro Ultra so i'm just thinking it just be a third party card that is clocked a bit higher than the standard Pro.
  • EnisadaEnisada Edmonton Member
    edited June 2003
    I think I may be looking at putting the 9600Pro into my system for a test around the block it should be here tomorrow. Thanks matt for the link.
  • EnisadaEnisada Edmonton Member
    edited June 2003
    It still didn't prove to me that there was a Radeon 9600Pro Ultra...:confused:
  • edited June 2003
    when you get the 9600 pro tell me what you max overclock is.
  • EnisadaEnisada Edmonton Member
    edited June 2003
    I will do that but I here that overall the 9500Pro is a better card. And with your core so high you don't even have to worry. None the less I will let you know how it goes...
  • edited June 2003
    well at stock speeds the 9500pro is a better card but when your card is overclocked it will be equal are a little better. not to many people get a good 9500 what will do 400core

    it would be cool to say ya my ATI video card its at 550/360
  • EnisadaEnisada Edmonton Member
    edited June 2003
    I suppose but your 9500Pro will still beat it in most benches...
  • CCWCCW Suffolk, UK
    edited June 2003
    Originally posted by matt

    most likely.

    It is actually a cut down core whereas 9500 wasnt cut down. The 9500 should be better.

    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=14267


    Craig
  • EnverexEnverex Worcester, UK Icrontian
    edited June 2003
    ATi really need to re-do their naming scheme, they are confusing the crap out of most people, and if it continues people may even start complaining or buying competitors products just because they cant work out what the hell to expect from and ATi card. Though the same is true with nVidia, but at least you know anything with MX on the end is crap.

    Bring back the old Voodoo naming scheme I say, that was strightforward :p

    NS
  • CCWCCW Suffolk, UK
    edited June 2003
    Voodoo, good naming scheme, shame about the card(s) :D
  • EnverexEnverex Worcester, UK Icrontian
    edited June 2003
    Hey, there is nothing wrong with the Voodoo cards (other than the V3's didnt do 32bit and the V5's needed a PC the length of a strech limo...) as I said, NOTHING wrong with the Voodoo cards. Still got a V3 chugging away downstairs, going to put it in my Amiga when the other PC gets upgraded.

    NS
  • CCWCCW Suffolk, UK
    edited June 2003
    LOL, I have the first ever proper 3D Card still.....a Voodoo 1 4MB, I used to love Voodoo cards :D

    Craig
Sign In or Register to comment.