C'mon guys - POST YOUR BENCHMARKS!

MrBillMrBill Missouri Member
edited December 2004 in Hardware
Let's see some benchmarks guys. I know there are some "newer" processors and vid cards out there that you guys are running. Show us what ya got! :D



//edit: Due to the original "Post Your Benchmarks" thread degradating into general discussion, I have split the two threads apart.
«1

Comments

  • EMNEMN
    edited June 2003
    :D
  • Rot-KatzeRot-Katze Pensacola, Florida
    edited June 2003
    I don't even know what to download to see what my score is *sigh*
  • CoasterCoaster
    edited June 2003
    www.madonion.com
    http://www.futuremark.com/download/?3dmark03.shtml
  • trippintrippin Chatt, TN
    edited June 2003
    Sandra Cpu Arith:

    cpu.jpg
  • stoopidstoopid Albany, NY New
    edited October 2003
    5506 3dmark03

    Sandra benches
    benchies.jpg
  • danball1976danball1976 Wichita Falls, TX
    edited October 2003
    Here's mine:

    //EDIT//
    Why does a AMD Athlon XP2600 2.08@2.25GHz get better arithmetic scores than a Barton at 2.2GHz?
  • danball1976danball1976 Wichita Falls, TX
    edited October 2003
    And another.
  • danball1976danball1976 Wichita Falls, TX
    edited October 2003
    And my memory
  • citrixmetacitrixmeta Montreal, Quebec Icrontian
    edited October 2003
    dual 2600MP's on my MSI K7D! 2 x ax-7's coming in this week, gonna be able to crank it up some more.
  • trippintrippin Chatt, TN
    edited October 2003
    Originally posted by citrixmeta
    dual 2600MP's on my MSI K7D! 2 x ax-7's coming in this week, gonna be able to crank it up some more.

    You are the only person I know with higher raw sandra arith scores than I.

    *bow*
  • citrixmetacitrixmeta Montreal, Quebec Icrontian
    edited October 2003
    so, i forced the multi to x17 , upped the voltage to 1.7v and TADA!!!!


    the temps i was getting with stock heatsinks were 60c (not Oced@1.6v)

    ive been folding, Max temp is 55c (overclocked)
  • citrixmetacitrixmeta Montreal, Quebec Icrontian
    edited October 2003
    umm, theres more :S 140x17!
  • NeoFXNeoFX Utah, US of A
    edited February 2004
    http://ap.zero-6.com/benchmark.htm

    Done at default settings and 3.432Ghz (264x13[1057FSB]) + 510/975 Core/Mem on my flashed 5900NU :) (MSI 5950U bios used)
  • phatrx7phatrx7
    edited April 2004
    My 2nd system's PCMark04 score - 4258
    compare url: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm04=248448
    (It's basically the same setup, but with a AMD64 3200+, eVGA 5700 Ultra DDR-II on XP 32 Bit .. other than that, both systems are identical). I have a 3rd computer too with a AMD XP 2500+, GeforceFX 5600 256mb, 1 Sata WD Raptor 10K 74g, Asus A7N8X mobo .. it's not online tho and I have'nt ever run PCMark04 on it .. I'll hook it up online later and test it tho.

    I can't post the scores from XP 64 Bit .. because I can't install Windows Media Encoder 9 on XP 64 Bit .. which inturn omit's one test, which inturn makes ORB say I can't post the score .. (BOOO!)

    But running 9 outta 10 tests w/ PCMark04 on XP 64 Bit I scored - 4798

    3DMark03 scores with eVGA GeforceFX 5700 Ultra on XP 32 Bit - 4334
    compare url: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2190056

    3DMark03 scores with Gainward GeforceFX 5700 Ultra GDDR3 on XP 64 Bit - 4711
    could'nt post these either.. for one, the build of 3DMark03 was'nt the latest released (it won't install for some reason), and the drivers were'nt recognized? wtf?

    I also ran some ATTO DiskBench v2.10 scores on my WD Raptors running RAID0.
    here's a few of the scores @ default settings except for total lenght @ 32mb

    0.5k = write @ 6724 / read @ 19441
    2.0k = write @ 22209 / read @ 41234
    16.0k = write @ 83107 / read @ 87762
    32.0k = write @ 98255 / read @ 101053
    512.0k = write @ 118396 / read @ 137110
    1024.0k = write @ 112208 / read @ 138412
    (done with onboard VIA VT8237 on XP 64 Bit .. scores simular on XP 32 Bit)

    Best tests for my System so far tho is.. running FarCry with the graphic settings @ "very high" .. that game is awsome in graphics!!! I can't run FarCry on my AMD XP 2500+ Barton with the GeforceFX 5600 @ "very high" settings .. it lag's like crazy, runs decent on "medium" settings .. but on my AMD64 systems it runs great on both XP 32 and XP 64 .. especially on XP 64 with my Gainward 5700 Ultra with GDDR3 .. FarCry is the only game the runs alot better on XP 64 tho .. all my other games like Counter-Strike 1.6, Call Of Duty, UT2004 & 2003, Raven Shield, etc.. all pretty much run about the same.. but XP 64 Bit is still in "beta" stages, and FarCry is 64 Bit enhanced .. hence the reason FarCry runs better on XP 64 for me. The "demo" of FarCry isn't a good comparison either.. because you can't take advantage of all the graphic settings in the "demo" .. the settings in the demo does'nt have "Ultra High" for the "water", or "very high" for most the other settings like "texture" / "particle count" / "lighting quality" / "enviroment" / "model texture" .. etc... you can only get those in the "full game".
  • citrixmetacitrixmeta Montreal, Quebec Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    a NEW BEST!
    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7791674

    5900U@ 500/900
  • NeoFXNeoFX Utah, US of A
    edited April 2004
    Very nice! I still haven't been able to get very much over 18k... I don't know how you guys break 20k!!! :(
  • ZuntarZuntar North Carolina Icrontian
    edited May 2004
    citrixmeta wrote:
    a NEW BEST!
    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7791674

    5900U@ 500/900


    A little late, but sssWwEEEEt!......some day.....

    *Zuntar ponders the day he will be able to complete "the Master"*
  • citrixmetacitrixmeta Montreal, Quebec Icrontian
    edited May 2004
    new score a few days ago, since i got my 9800xt

    23693

    no tweaks yet, and no videocard OC


    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7839903
  • ZuntarZuntar North Carolina Icrontian
    edited May 2004
    :p:bowdown:
  • GnomeWizarddGnomeWizardd Member 4 Life Akron, PA Icrontian
    edited May 2004
    Since you insist Its no FX-51 with a mach II and a 9800XT but it works :jelly:
  • citrixmetacitrixmeta Montreal, Quebec Icrontian
    edited May 2004
    thats a great score man.

    can u post a cPU-Z of ur MEM timing paaaleezzzzzz
  • TurambarTurambar
    edited May 2004
    how do you get a cpu-z is it a special program?
  • GnomeWizarddGnomeWizardd Member 4 Life Akron, PA Icrontian
    edited May 2004
    The only thing diff its now at 222 5 not 2226
  • MackanzMackanz
    edited May 2004
    I told ya Gnome. ;)
    Another 2k is under that hood though.
  • bchadbchad
    edited August 2004
    What should I benchmark a 2.4c with? What other machines you think are worth comparing it to?
  • citrixmetacitrixmeta Montreal, Quebec Icrontian
    edited August 2004
    well, your not really in competition vs anyone else.

    just tweak your system and compare your original score to your tweaked one. what hardware you running?
  • citrixmetacitrixmeta Montreal, Quebec Icrontian
    edited August 2004
    hows this for mem bandwidth :bringit: :bringit:

    at 3.2-3.3v
  • ZuntarZuntar North Carolina Icrontian
    edited August 2004
    Dear God man :bowdown: PWN4R

    Nuf said!
  • bchadbchad
    edited August 2004
    Damn.
  • citrixmetacitrixmeta Montreal, Quebec Icrontian
    edited August 2004
    and a new record for me,


    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8040015
Sign In or Register to comment.