Good Gaming Card -- Not the Best but good enough...
Thank you for those of you who replied to my ATI versus Nvidia thread
but come to think of it, i just want need for speed underground to run at a good frame rate, and have all the visual effects ready for me to use. i dont have the option for playing with ALL the visual options on my GF2 gts, it has 64 mb of ram but still, the game itself lags.... very much.
i have a p4 1.6 northwood 512K, Abit BL7 [only supports 1.5v, but does agp 8x work on this card?--which is .8v right?] 1 gig of ram, and this old crappy gf2 gts pro 64mb card.
i installed the game onto a friend's computer who had an athlon 1800+ with an ATI radeon 9600xt and the game looks incredible. but those are 200$
whats the cheapest solution to my problems?
thanks again guys.
but come to think of it, i just want need for speed underground to run at a good frame rate, and have all the visual effects ready for me to use. i dont have the option for playing with ALL the visual options on my GF2 gts, it has 64 mb of ram but still, the game itself lags.... very much.
i have a p4 1.6 northwood 512K, Abit BL7 [only supports 1.5v, but does agp 8x work on this card?--which is .8v right?] 1 gig of ram, and this old crappy gf2 gts pro 64mb card.
i installed the game onto a friend's computer who had an athlon 1800+ with an ATI radeon 9600xt and the game looks incredible. but those are 200$
whats the cheapest solution to my problems?
thanks again guys.
0
Comments
They are as good or better than the ti4600 since they support DX9.
You get fairly decent performance for the tiny price tag, and the only game I cant run very well is Deus Ex: Invisible War. And nobody can run that well :P
I hear good things about the Radeon 9200 as well, both are very cheap and should suit you well if you plan to upgrade your whole machine in the not too distant future. That was my reason for buying the FX..
isnt need for speed ran on dx9???????
then whats the difference?