XGI Volari, new video card company

ArmoArmo Mr. Nice Guy Is Dead,Only Aqua Remains Member
edited November 2003 in Hardware
A friend found this on toms hardware last night, its pretty interesting.

The Volari V8 is the flagship model of the lineup. This 256bit chip is manufactured on a 130-nanometer process and offers full DirectX 9 support. The design sports eight-pixel rendering pipelines with a total of four pixel shader 2.0 units as well as two vertex shader 2.0 units. All in all, the chip has about 80 million transistors, which is roughly equivalent with NVIDIA's NV 36 chips. It supports both GDDR and GDDR-2 memory modules (max. 256MB), accessed through a memory interface XGI quaintly calls BroadBahn. This interface subdivides the memory into four channels of 128bit each, giving it an internal bit-width of 512bit. Since the modules are only addressed using a 32bit bus, the actual resulting memory bus bandwidth is 128bit.

Volari V8 single chip solutions:

Volari V8 Ultra: 8 pixel pipes, Core frequency: 350MHz, memory frequency: 375MHz with DDR, 500MHz with DDR2
Volari V8: 8 pixel pipes, core frequency: 300MHz, memory frequency: 325MHz with DDR, 450MHz with DDR2
The image output is handled by an internal 400MHz RAMDAC. A second display can also be used, thanks to the external video bridge chip SIS301 MV, which is also responsible for the TV output. XGI has developed its own pixel-based interpolation method for video playback. This is handled by the Cypher Video Processor built into the graphics chip. XGI claims that its method greatly improves the image quality of interlaced film material compared to the popular bob and weave methods.


*Images removed cause they don't work anymore and I think they are making the thread load slow*

The card actually dosnt do that bad in benchies, although it couldnt be tested on all the games THW throws at it, the drivers ARE beta and belive it or not, for a company just comming on the market with a flagship like this id keep and eye on them

Comments

  • ThraxThrax 🐌 Austin, TX Icrontian
    edited November 2003
    In many regards the XGI Volari is nothing short of amazing. They've been around as a public company less than, what, seven months? And already they're capable of producing a card that far outpaces the cards in the history of their respective companies, and comes close to producing cards of identical calibre to ATI and nVidia who have R&D budgets presumably much larger than XGI.

    Their financial situation appears to be sound. It must be to adhere to the projections they've been displaying. Additionally, it's good to see a large producer of cards behind them; Powercolor.

    Their cards look wonderous. Black PCB, copper sinks.

    The technology is sound. And it's interesting to see a dual GPU part back on the market. It makes me curious to see if this will be a trend. Instead of bigger, better, faster for single GPUs, it could be slightly bigger, slightly better, much faster when combining GPUs.

    Considering the beta status of their drivers, it's nothing short of remarkable that it's playing with the big boys; ATI and nVidia. Coming in the running with the 9800 XT and the 5950 Ultra. Considering the projected pricepoint of $300...Not too shabby.

    I'm impressed.
  • WuGgaRoOWuGgaRoO Not in the shower Icrontian
    edited November 2003
    well./..lets hope their drivers outperform their beta drivers....but at any rate...i doubt theyll be a top contendor for the number 1 slot for at least a year or so...or until they get enough dinero to sumwhat match ATi and nVidia
  • edited November 2003
    XGI is a spinoff of SIS...they are "new" in name only so it's no real surprise they are doing as well as they are, at least to me.
  • SimGuySimGuy Ottawa, Canada
    edited November 2003
    As long as it delivers relevant performance in real-world DirectX & OGL applications for it's pricepoint, the thing will sell wonderfully.

    SiS-spinoff or not, it's still impressive to see a brand new spin-off company develop something with that much video horsepower in 7 months and be able to bring it to market within 12.

    As long as the drivers are stable and are routinely updated, I see no reason why not to consider an XGI-based video card in the future. :)
  • edited November 2003
    I agree but I was pointing out that the XGI nametag is using work that had been done by SIS and by the graphics company that they aquired a short time ago (again missing brain cells) that had been working on a vpu of some sort that was supposed to offer TI level performance and had another in the works to supercede that one later on.
    I agree that the XGI cards are going to be forces to be reckoned with and from the looks of things they could end up stealing the thunder from ATI as well as Nvidia if they are able to offer performance of at least 80% of a 9800pro for just over half the cost of the 9800pro 256Mb version.
  • SimGuySimGuy Ottawa, Canada
    edited November 2003
    SiS & Trident :)
    2 of the original founders of visual technology. :)

    It would be nice to see a 3rd contender in the 3D graphics ring to bring much-needed competition with a high-end product able to offer supreme performance at a realistic price rating. XGI just may be able to do that. :)
  • kanezfankanezfan sunny south florida Icrontian
    edited November 2003
    i read that review at tom's, and it seems to me like their drivers were engineered to perform well on benchmarking apps. Look at how far the performance fell off on games. I won't believe they have anything until it hits the streets and real people are really impressed playing real games on these cards. until then, it's just another savage3d to me.
  • TemplarTemplar You first.
    edited November 2003
    What might hurt them is the fact that ATI and nVidia's major player cards are already out on the market. If the card can pull through before Christmas, which I don't see happening, they'll miss a chance to make a bigger splash in the GFX market.

    Unless these cards turn out at least decent to compared to ATI's mid-level card, I probably won't buy from them :(
  • edited November 2003
    I have to say that I agree with SimGuy on this...I hope that they do indeed have a good product and that it serves notice to both ATI and Nvidia that there are others out there willing to provide great bang for the buck...maybe then they might consider dropping prices on the high-end lines so that more people can afford them.
    Heck, if they serve up a good upper end card that's well implemented and not 2 weeks salary to buy I might consider replacing my 5900U with one and selling the ASUS.
Sign In or Register to comment.