Cheap Laser Printers
Camman
NEW! England Icrontian
I saw some people talking about buying laser printers on the cheap. Well, I print a lot of documents and such and things that I like to keep records of, and right now I'm using a Lexmark inkjet printer which is expensive to keep buying cartridges for.
Anyone know of a good/older Laser printer I should look at either on some tech related online sale outlets or through ebay? I know nothing about laser printers, whats a good price, or some older models that will work good and I can aquire cheap.
Anyone know of a good/older Laser printer I should look at either on some tech related online sale outlets or through ebay? I know nothing about laser printers, whats a good price, or some older models that will work good and I can aquire cheap.
0
Comments
I can't tell you if it's good or not, but it's made by xerox. Be sure to read the product description.
I would personally stick with HP as they are very good on the support front (and quality).
To be honest, that printer for $50 doesn't look worth it, as it looks older than the 4L (4L supports PCL5e). If you want to print images at all but still really cheap then look at the rest of the other HP LJ 4 series as they support 600x600dpi.
NS
VERY good basic printer, and the cartridges are designed so precisely to spec that they ship AIR or ground untaped at all and have never leaked a tiny spot of toner on me inside or outside printer or in bag. When I turn off the toner saver, a power cycle of printer, swinging down and forward of front of case with printer off, and slight side to side shaking of the cartridge out of case gets me nice neat clean printout for another 250-300 pages beyond the rated 2500 pages, as the toner saver is THAT effective at what it does and the printer runs cooler than an HP also. One thing, go by overall output per cart over long term, first cart is about 2/3 to 3/4 full and is STATED to be a starter cartridge.
John.
I just picked up the 4000TN with JetDirect (IP Printing) support for $100 CDN.
Even the oldest LaserJets use 3500 or 6000 page toners, and the new ones all use 6000, 10000, or 15000 page toners.
NS
BTW: That Samsung is a killer deal, even purchased new.
Right now HP is pricing too much on brand rep for my tastes. I also run more than just Windows and HP drivers that are excellent for HP lasers are not as available as the Samsung drivers, which had a Linux driver right on the CD. With the Samsung, I just flip the USB switch, either Windows or Linux prints equally well to the Samsung. that may not be a benefit in this case, is here for those who might read this later.
For Enterprise and large workgroup, definitely HP. For end users, would have to say Samsung or a low-end HP and BABY the HP's power input requirements. The Samsung seems more resilient as to voltage variations also, and the cartridge is sealed so well that humidity does not seem to affect printing or fusing. It also runs COOLER than the HP internally. I have made a bunch of transparencies on it, and these were NOT laser transparency sheets used (try ink jet sheets, which even the Canon copier (personal) does not like very well if the results bear my theory out. Samsung also heat vented better, there are at least three fans in the thing to vent fuser heat and the power supply. Not bad for a company mostly know in the far east and Europe up to now as far as laser and LCDs go-- my father had a Samsung computer in 1988, thing stayed in service 5 years and was used a LOT for legal work and the monitor was in service until 2003 and still did as well as ever until then. So, lesser know yes, but not known for shoddy goods. Samsung HDs are not comparable to major vendors, lesser lifecycle, but better than DeathStars and Fujitsus for the most part. So, they HAVE a name that is not so majorly known here in US, but make decent products overall. And they WANT to be known here, so are pricing more aggressively than HP right now.
John.