Intel's CSI, faster than McFly
Thrax
🐌Austin, TX Icrontian
It's no secret that Intel's continued reliance on a northbridge-based bus architecture is a miserable way to do front side BUSiness. When compared to hypertransport, routing I/O through the CPU to the various parts of the board, rather than permitting direct communication, is a draconian tactic.
Enter Intel's Common System Interconnect, which will introduce not only a HyperTransport-like bus with <i>amazing</i> bandwidth, but will also herald an IMC for Intel CPUs. With Intel's tremendous power and the addition of CSI and an IMC, there's no telling what sort of bandwidth could be summoned.
It's like Godzilla. Except for your system bus... And Tokyo is the benchmark. But if you don't believe us, the individual who's done some serious sleuthing on the matter has a full writeup here.
<Neo>Whoa.</Neo>
Enter Intel's Common System Interconnect, which will introduce not only a HyperTransport-like bus with <i>amazing</i> bandwidth, but will also herald an IMC for Intel CPUs. With Intel's tremendous power and the addition of CSI and an IMC, there's no telling what sort of bandwidth could be summoned.
It's like Godzilla. Except for your system bus... And Tokyo is the benchmark. But if you don't believe us, the individual who's done some serious sleuthing on the matter has a full writeup here.
<Neo>Whoa.</Neo>
0
Comments
I'd like to see AMD and Intel work together to create a universal system interconnect & CPU socket. Remember the good ol' Socket 7 days?
Yep, I think so too. And I hope that AMD can come back from the deep hole they have dug themselves into in the last year or so. I enjoy the great prices that serious competition brings on the processors.