Windows 7 != MinWin
Thrax
🐌Austin, TX Icrontian
<p>Much has been said about the next edition of Windows, code-named Windows 7, particularly after Eric Traut's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MinWin#MinWin">MinWin demonstration</a>. Piggy-backing on the MinWin hype has come rampant speculation about what will and will not be included in Microsoft's 2009 or 2010 release. Most of the speculation, as is typical, is photoshopped or merges into the white-noise of the everybody's-an-analyst internet. </p>
<p>Yesterday, ars <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20071218-reality-check-what-we-know-and-dont-about-windows-7.html">put its foot down</a> and goes for the jugular to point out what has been said that's untrue, and what has been said that <em>is</em> true about the features of Microsoft's next OS. Topics include touch sensitivity, virtualization and sandboxing.</p>
<p>Yay, buzzwords!</p>
<p>Yesterday, ars <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20071218-reality-check-what-we-know-and-dont-about-windows-7.html">put its foot down</a> and goes for the jugular to point out what has been said that's untrue, and what has been said that <em>is</em> true about the features of Microsoft's next OS. Topics include touch sensitivity, virtualization and sandboxing.</p>
<p>Yay, buzzwords!</p>
0
Comments
*seconded*
I greeted Windows Vista with mixed feelings- and view it as an unnecessary hassle right now.
Today I find myself greeting the news of Windows 7 with trepidation.
Will it be Vista SE or ... Vista ME?