full list of 'allies'

Invisible-MuffinInvisible-Muffin Scotland
edited April 2008 in Gaming
since we're now a wing of [GA] we the FF rule governs us as being allies of all allies of every other wing of the [GA] coalition.
so i searched all the allies of all wings, this is what i found as a full alliance list. i apologise if i repeated anything. and note that these alliances are spread over the entire map, not just NW.


any [GA]
any Van (VanGuard, etc)
any BLA
NWM
Elite
E.T.A.
Kamikaze
any ARRSE
any SUAL
~B~D~P~
DEADLY S
any B.W.
=G2=
ND
NDI
NDII
A.H.F.
Venus
any PANTH
any FEAR
~R & D~
RVG
22SAS
*Empire*
Exigence
OL ~ BDP
T.V.A
[A]XIVth
MoM
any Dynamo
Pheonix
any [V]
T.A.G.
DT2
SSDD
ALFORIA
any SPQR
E*X*3
[A]
SVU
QUGS
NW
D.C.
Knights!
Slaves
~*TW*~
noi
I.N.U.
TFS
TVR
Sssssss
any FMAT
K.O.H.
-DS-
boro
T.D.T.
NW*S*
LAA
Goth
TRA
R-D-U
E*X*3
PRO*[HC]
SERVER
B.W. TW
N-K™
300

Comments

  • LincLinc Owner Detroit Icrontian
    edited April 2008
    OK, thanks mate. I've mentioned this to W1lliam to see how he wants to sort it out.
  • QCHQCH Ancient Guru Chicago Area - USA Icrontian
    edited April 2008
    gulp... THAT is a list!!!
  • Invisible-MuffinInvisible-Muffin Scotland
    edited April 2008
    i had to count the wings of alliances that wings of [GA] are allied to as well, they still count.
    wings count as the same alliance, and wings allied to wings causes a technicality in the FF rule that can be enforced, but its usually not noticed by anyone.
    its still better to be safe than sorry, as some people may still report it, and we'd have no real defence.
  • LincLinc Owner Detroit Icrontian
    edited April 2008
    Invisible Muffin wrote:
    we'd have no real defence.
    "Excuse us, but given that we have no mechanism to control alliances between wings I'd say this is a game coding issue" :p
  • Invisible-MuffinInvisible-Muffin Scotland
    edited April 2008
    Keebler wrote:
    "Excuse us, but given that we have no mechanism to control alliances between wings I'd say this is a game coding issue" :p

    well, it'd have to be reported to the multihunter.
    i figure it wouldnt be a large ban, since its so vague, but it would be the fault of bad wing communication and organisation.
    its all technically sound, we'll see if we can have the alliance cleansed of all unneccessary alliances.
  • HarudathHarudath Great Britain Icrontian
    edited April 2008
    Wow... Is there anyone left to attack? :confused:
  • BlackHawkBlackHawk Bible music connoisseur There's no place like 127.0.0.1 Icrontian
    edited April 2008
    I just stopped raiding any people with alliances for fear that they were part of our "coalition". Now I only raid people that aren't with an alliance.
  • TBonZTBonZ Ottawa, ON Icrontian
    edited April 2008
    Black Hawk wrote:
    I just stopped raiding any people with alliances for fear that they were part of our "coalition". Now I only raid people that aren't with an alliance.

    Just because you replied to this thread BH, GS is active again at the powerbase.
  • LincLinc Owner Detroit Icrontian
    edited April 2008
    I figured out how to resolve wanting razar12's 5-clay village without breaking friendly fire rules.

    I'm just going to level it. :D
  • Invisible-MuffinInvisible-Muffin Scotland
    edited April 2008
    yeah, thats allowed...
    you're not allowed to raid or capture friendly villages, but it says nothing about catapults or destruction of villages :p

    plus, i doubt people will notice, it's a small wing and its only protected by FF because a wing of GA is allied to a different wing of FEAR...
    so they may not notice the breach even if there was one
Sign In or Register to comment.