SanDisk CEO says Vista is not ready for new SSDs

ThraxThrax 🐌Austin, TX Icrontian
edited July 2008 in Science & Tech
The Solid State Disk's (SSD) slow rise to preeminence is not without its technical hurdles, says Eli Harari, the Chairman and CEO of SanDisk. In a recent conference call regarding SanDisk's second quarter earnings, he firmly suggested that the next generation of Solid State Disks employing multilevel cell (MLC) technology will be too complex for Vista to leverage correctly.

MLC NAND flash is set to revolutionize the anemic capacities of today's SSDs. Current disks use four transistor states per cell to hold two bits of information. MLC drives will address the present inability to increase areal density by vertically stacking multiple levels within a single cell. This technology is expected to usher in drives boasting capacities exceeding 256GB.

Harari suggests that Vista's ability to coordinate the exchange of information between the mainboard's controller and the on-disk controller is insufficient with the next generation. He further ascribes SanDisk's ailing development cycle to these issues by saying, "We have very good internal controller technology, as you know...That said, I'd say that we are now behind because we did not fully understand, frankly, the limitations in the Vista environment."

He goes on to suggest that we have not yet realized the enormity of the problem because "Existing controllers can get the job done for 8-, 16-, and 32-gigabyte storage because these are relatively unsophisticated and demanding requirements."

These statements come as the first indication we've heard that Vista's SSD performance is less than acceptable. We are concerned with the validity of these assertions given that SanDisk is blaming their sluggish development process on a previously unheard of problem.

Perhaps other SSD manufacturers will confirm these claims in the coming weeks as MLC technology is closer to release, but for now we're going to take all of this with a grain of salt.

Comments

  • SnarkasmSnarkasm Madison, WI Icrontian
    edited July 2008
    What a ridiculous claim, and especially to single out Vista for it. HFS+ and other file systems use automatic defragging which'll be even worse for an SSD's lifetime (and gives you ZERO benefit), but all he does is call out Vista and give NO reasoning for it. Awesome.

    I also disagree that MLC is the way to be; the cost of putting those four layers in per chip means that disk lifetime goes down as you'll have to access each chip more often. Read and write speeds drop because of it as well. Lower MTBF + slower disk usage doesn't outweigh the increased capacity to me.
  • QeldromaQeldroma Arid ZoneAh Member
    edited July 2008
    I have to go with Snark on this one. This is a USB, SD slot solution provider that now finds itself in the world of hard drives and their interfaces. This seems typical of some corporate/marketing officers who don't understand engineering details and want everyone else to suddenly play by their rules. It works for the rest of the drive makers, so this comes across like the ranting of a spoiled child.

    I think they found something that is making them go back to the drawing board and they simply don't want to pay the cost of redesign.
Sign In or Register to comment.