Windows 2000

DisvengeanceDisvengeance
edited December 2003 in Hardware
is 2000 better for just getting higher fsb speeds, or for all aspects of overclocking?

Comments

  • dak125dak125
    edited December 2003
    Disvengeance wrote:
    is 2000 better for just getting higher fsb speeds, or for all aspects of overclocking?

    I don't see how the OS would affect ocing? Perhaps if you're using Win 98 or the like. But Win 2000/XP I think you'd be good to go. (Just a guess)
  • ThraxThrax 🐌 Austin, TX Icrontian
    edited December 2003
    Windows 2000 allows higher overclocks (FSB in particular, but CPU too).
  • SputnikSputnik Worcester, MA
    edited December 2003
    any particular reason thrax?
  • ThraxThrax 🐌 Austin, TX Icrontian
    edited December 2003
    I don't know why.. Just know that it's true.
  • DisvengeanceDisvengeance
    edited December 2003
    I think it may be that windows xp is more ''flashy and graphical'' than 2000, so it puts more stress on youre system? Im probably wrong though.
  • PirateNinjaPirateNinja Icrontian
    edited December 2003
    Im pretty sure Win2k does not track all the I/O on your hard drives, where as WinXP logs it in cache. Causes memory and drives to be more unstable. WinXP gets a big fart noise and thumbs down. :aol:
Sign In or Register to comment.