Bring Hulu back to Boxee

ThraxThrax 🐌Austin, TX Icrontian
edited February 2009 in Science & Tech

Comments

  • MiracleManSMiracleManS Chambersburg, PA Icrontian
    edited February 2009
    Its a shame too, because it just brings their content to a wider audience. I fail to see how greater saturation/penetration of the available audience is BAD.
  • SnarkasmSnarkasm Madison, WI Icrontian
    edited February 2009
    Munnee.
  • MiracleManSMiracleManS Chambersburg, PA Icrontian
    edited February 2009
    But aren't they losing money by not providing an easy, effective way for users to stream this stuff to their television?

    Maybe I'm missing some grander vision of a future in which I pay $.50/minute to view TV shows over my computer.
  • ThraxThrax 🐌 Austin, TX Icrontian
    edited February 2009
    You're not visiting the Hulu website. Therefore you're not giving Hulu page impressions. Therefore you're not giving content providers an accurate count of people interested in IPTV/web media.
  • MiracleManSMiracleManS Chambersburg, PA Icrontian
    edited February 2009
    I guess I can see that, but can't they work out an agreement on how to count that stuff instead of saying "NO! BAD CONSUMER!"?
  • SnarkasmSnarkasm Madison, WI Icrontian
    edited February 2009
    Maybe, but that takes tiiiiiiime. Because these are big corporaaaaaations.

    And in the meantime, while they figure out what to do, they say no. They'd rather restrict unnecessarily just in case they're losing revenue than let it go until they figure it out for sure.
  • MiracleManSMiracleManS Chambersburg, PA Icrontian
    edited February 2009
    Man, I can't wait for the day a company says "Wait, if we engender good feelings from users, maybe they'll be more apt to trust us!" Of course, that contradicts the "Ok, I've gotta make sure I'm a douchebag so these users know their place!" rule.
Sign In or Register to comment.