Options

Athlon64 FX53, Socket 939 3400+ & 3700+ Due on Mar 29th???

edited January 2004 in Science & Tech
From [link=http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=13525 ]The Inquirer[/link]
[blockquote]
FRENCH SITE X86-Secret said that AMD will start its move to Socket 939 on the 29th March.

According to the site, on that date AMD will roll out not only the Athlon 64 FX 53, but also Socket 939 chips with PR ratings of 3400+ and 3700+.[/blockquote]

[link=http://www.x86-secret.com]X86-Secret[/link]

Comments

  • kanezfankanezfan sunny south florida Icrontian
    edited January 2004
    3700 :wow: awesome! I wanna see a true 3Ghz chip spank the crap out of a pee 4
  • croc_croc_ New
    edited January 2004
    I couldn't find the english button, so I translated it with babel.

    After you to have envisaged (successfully) the final name of Pentium 4 Prescott (Pentium 4 ' E') and goes back it to launching of the platform grantsdale, we can now let to us go to some speculations on the date of exit of Athlon 64 Socket 939. According to several recut Russian sources (obviously much more reliable than those of Xbit which announced the FX53 for last December and which was relayed per many of other sites without any checking), the date of official launching of the platform Socket 939 is currently scheduled for... 29 the Mars! If this date say something to you, it is that it is identical to that which we announce to you for the Grantsdale platform. Having probably still across the throat the launching of Pentium 4 EE that INTEL very intentionally placed the same day that the range Athlon 64/FX, AMD probably seek to return with INTEL the currency of its part. 29 the Mars, we will thus see appearing Athlon 64 3400+ in Socket 939. Athlon 64 3700+ Socket 939 and Athlon 64 FX 53 should as for them appear either a little later, or at the same time, us have not been able yet to obtain this information. For recall, the principal interest of Socket 939 will be to offer Dual Channel Unbuffered to Athlon 64, currently in single channel. This makes unfortunately null and void in the very short term the platform Socket 754. More serious, AMD does not seem to want to give too bad conscience by giving up too early this platform. Athlon 64 3200+ and 3000+ will be available besides only in version Socket 754 and not in Socket 939, which induces that the user wanting to offer a system AMD64 at low prices will be obliged to turn to Socket 754, even if it will have a null evolutionarity then. A cornΓ©lien choice... especially as one sees the good performances offered by this processor.
  • TemplarTemplar You first.
    edited January 2004
    I still can hardly believe they're making that one pin off (I know it's necessary) from the FX51. The motherboard manufacturers must feel like AMD took a hammer to their toes.
  • mmonninmmonnin Centreville, VA
    edited January 2004
    A 939 can fit into a 940.
  • ThraxThrax 🐌 Austin, TX Icrontian
    edited January 2004
    Correct.
  • panzerkwpanzerkw New York City
    edited January 2004
    :drool:
  • ThraxThrax 🐌 Austin, TX Icrontian
    edited January 2004
    The shift to S939 is to:

    1. Facilitate the addition of DDR2 support.
    2. Use less layers in the manufacturing of the Opteron/AFX51.
    3. A die shrink.
    4. Make it far less expensive for the consumer.
  • mmonninmmonnin Centreville, VA
    edited January 2004
    w00t GO #4!!
  • csimoncsimon Acadiana Icrontian
    edited January 2004
    lets see this year we have:

    1. s939
    2. pci express
    3. ddr2

    what else do we have to look forward to?
  • a2jfreaka2jfreak Houston, TX Member
    edited January 2004
    hopefully a 64-bit optimized F@H core! :fold::fold::fold:
  • Omega65Omega65 Philadelphia, Pa
    edited January 2004
    csimon wrote:
    lets see this year we have:

    1. s939
    2. pci express
    3. ddr2

    what else do we have to look forward to?

    Don't Forget the new BTX Layout, the NV40 and R420 GPUs
  • mmonninmmonnin Centreville, VA
    edited January 2004
    I want an R420 with 32-bit graphics.
  • ThraxThrax 🐌 Austin, TX Icrontian
    edited January 2004
    We also have to look forward to HD-DVD, 802.11N, the Tejas, Intel's Grantsdale chipset, and Windows XP for 64 Bit Extended.
  • TheBaronTheBaron Austin, TX
    edited January 2004
    and you just KNOW i'll have $1000 burning a hole in my pocket after all this tech comes out... even if i dont have a grand to spend :)
  • EnverexEnverex Worcester, UK Icrontian
    edited January 2004
    Argh, Do I wait for the Socket 939 stuff..... or do a buy a A64 3200+ now....... I DONT KNOW!! :cry:
  • a2jfreaka2jfreak Houston, TX Member
    edited January 2004
    Is the performance difference of the 3200+ worth the extra money when compared to the 3000+?

    Personally, I'm waiting to see what the socket 939 CPUs do; however, my system is an AXP running @ 2.3GHz so it isn't like I'm presently hurting for speed.
  • EyesOnlyEyesOnly Sweden New
    edited January 2004
    Personly i would wait. Then again i'm running a p2 now and are considering going to athlon xp as my first rig. When a 64bit windows comes out then i can consider changing. Till then i'm running 32bit.

    EO
  • EnverexEnverex Worcester, UK Icrontian
    edited January 2004
    I think I am going to upgrade anyway, more or less for the main reason that this rig is being a pain in the ass. The RAID controller is iffy, it has the most stupid "clock back" system in the world when it doesn't complete post, and It doesn't seem to wan't me to overclock anymore.
    If I want to pgrade again, I can later in August for my birthday, when the prices will have come down from the release (if you think, first it comes out with high prices in the US on 29th March, takes ages to get to the UK, at which point it will cost alot more, so you will need to wait more anyway). Basically if you are waiting for Socket 939 in the UK, it's going to be a long wait.

    But there is just the one question now, which motherboard?
  • EyesOnlyEyesOnly Sweden New
    edited January 2004
    Wouldn't the best bet be Asus or Abit. As for model that will have to wait untill the 29 of march. My first modern rig will still be 32bit even if a new windows comes out in time. When something this new comes out it's bound to have several child deceases. So i'll wait till most of that has been sorted out.
  • EnverexEnverex Worcester, UK Icrontian
    edited January 2004
    EyesOnly wrote:
    Wouldn't the best bet be Asus or Abit. As for model that will have to wait untill the 29 of march. My first modern rig will still be 32bit even if a new windows comes out in time. When something this new comes out it's bound to have several child deceases. So i'll wait till most of that has been sorted out.

    I was refering to motherboard for an existing Athlon 64. The ABit board has a silly heatpipe and also has no legacy ports, which makes it out of the question, and the Asus board is a via chipset, which I am still warey about.

    Regarding 64 bit, I can use it in Linux now anyway, and in Windows when it comes out, so I will get a chance to try it anyway,
  • ThraxThrax 🐌 Austin, TX Icrontian
    edited January 2004
    The VIA K8T880 is superior to the nForce3.
  • EnverexEnverex Worcester, UK Icrontian
    edited January 2004
    Thrax wrote:
    The VIA K8T880 is superior to the nForce3.

    Are the boards pretty stable now or are they still a little buggy? As currently I am so ripped between buying and not buying, I have no idea what to do. Any ideas on the pricing for the new chips and boards? If there are even any boards announced...
  • ThraxThrax 🐌 Austin, TX Icrontian
    edited January 2004
    Existing boards will support Socket 939 easily.

    I would personally wait until April to see what happens with 939.
  • EnverexEnverex Worcester, UK Icrontian
    edited January 2004
    Existing socket 7XX boards will support socket 939?..... As what I was looking at were the normal Athlon 64s, not opterons as they are stupidly expensive.

    I am not going to buy a Socket 940 board as they are stupidly expensive, have a look - http://www.komplett.co.uk/k/kl.asp?AvdID=1&CatID=10&GrpID=13&t=2023&l=2
  • TheLostSwedeTheLostSwede Trondheim, Norway Icrontian
    edited January 2004
    Thrax wrote:
    The VIA K8T880 is superior to the nForce3.

    Based on?
  • EyesOnlyEyesOnly Sweden New
    edited January 2004
    Enverex wrote:
    I was refering to motherboard for an existing Athlon 64. The ABit board has a silly heatpipe and also has no legacy ports, which makes it out of the question, and the Asus board is a via chipset, which I am still warey about.

    Regarding 64 bit, I can use it in Linux now anyway, and in Windows when it comes out, so I will get a chance to try it anyway,

    I like many others don't use linux though i have consired using some build of knoppix as a posibility in a foldingbox other than that i'm going for windows, hence why i don't care that linux as of now does have 64bit support. I don't know much about existing 64bitboards so i can't comment about them. As for newer boards wouldn't they be different then existing and perhaps support legacy ports. We don't know yet. As for which chipset being good or bad that something i can't answer either.

    I said Asus or Abit since the members of this site seems to agree that their boards are the best ones for socket A and i figured the same to be true for socket 7xx and 9xx. Only time and benchmarks will tell.
Sign In or Register to comment.