That phrase "lawful Internet content of their choice" is going to get twisted pretty quickly to mean any and all filtering of torrent protocols is totally legal.
They can only use services of their choice when it involves retrieving lawful content of their choice - and I'm betting that very quickly, there will be a blanket argument that BitTorrent downloads are all illegal.
I hope to be proven wrong, but I can definitely see it coming.
Obama's DOJ head said the ridiculous fines in the recent RIAA sanctioned cases were legal, he appointed a proinant RIAA lawyer as an assistant to the attorney general, and by some estimates over seven million dollars of Obama's campaign finacing came from the entertainment industry.
Snark, before I go on, and I being a blow hard conspiracy theorist again, or are we on the same page on this one?
Well, you're still a blowhard conspiracy theorist, but not much will ever change that.
I was referring more to the RIAA, MPAA, and ISP lobbyists that I believe will be making these claims, not the government itself. I hope the FCC has or is given the clout to handle these appropriately and levelheadedly, but I've just seen too many situations where lobbyists are able to bend laws and shape rulings to their whim that I see WAY too much flexibility in the wording of that first clause.
Comments
The BitTorrent protocol is completely legal, and therefore cannot be filtered.
I hope to be proven wrong, but I can definitely see it coming.
Lets see,
Obama's DOJ head said the ridiculous fines in the recent RIAA sanctioned cases were legal, he appointed a proinant RIAA lawyer as an assistant to the attorney general, and by some estimates over seven million dollars of Obama's campaign finacing came from the entertainment industry.
Snark, before I go on, and I being a blow hard conspiracy theorist again, or are we on the same page on this one?
I was referring more to the RIAA, MPAA, and ISP lobbyists that I believe will be making these claims, not the government itself. I hope the FCC has or is given the clout to handle these appropriately and levelheadedly, but I've just seen too many situations where lobbyists are able to bend laws and shape rulings to their whim that I see WAY too much flexibility in the wording of that first clause.
Let the record show that you and I agree on this one.
-drasnor
I, too, can name random pieces of software!